The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex WatchTech

View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok?
Yes, no issues 1,059 69.72%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine 62 4.08%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) 398 26.20%
Voters: 1519. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 March 2023, 09:08 PM   #3601
Doublesalto
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Paris
Posts: 11
Bought a sd43 in may 2020
Slightly slow at start (-1/2 sec / day) and became way worse end of 2022 ( ~ -5 sec/ day minimum )
So I went to my AD ( bon marché Paris) ; they have a fast process in place for Watches under warranty
They gave me back the watch one week later !!
They were not very clear on the job done : in depth cleaning, barrel change, échappement change, …
A bit fast ( +1 sec/day) but very stable now
Overall a very impressive performance
Doublesalto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2023, 10:07 PM   #3602
douglasf13
"TRF" Member
 
douglasf13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well

Well expect now there are around 2000000 plus 32 movements in this world today, and seeing that most all Rolex watches are hard to get even with the 32 movement inside. Ask yourself this if the 32 movement is so bad as some like to portray why do they still sell everyone they make.
None of the watch media outlets will report on it, particularly since they’re all riding in the wake of the Rolex hype-train over the last five years. Plus, many buyers don’t pay attention to the time keeping of their watches, and some don’t even set their watch at all, since they’ve got a more accurate timekeeper in their pocket (or they rotate between several watches.)
douglasf13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2023, 11:08 PM   #3603
Commander C.
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
None of the watch media outlets will report on it, particularly since they’re all riding in the wake of the Rolex hype-train over the last five years.
On the other hand, the watch media love to ride the Rolex hype train with clickbait titles such as "Rolex price drop?", "Better than Rolex?", etc. I don't know why they would balk at creating a video titled "Problems with the latest Rolex movement?"
Commander C. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2023, 06:24 AM   #3604
Toshk
"TRF" Member
 
Toshk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander C. View Post
On the other hand, the watch media love to ride the Rolex hype train with clickbait titles such as "Rolex price drop?", "Better than Rolex?", etc. I don't know why they would balk at creating a video titled "Problems with the latest Rolex movement?"

Precisely! The lot of them
Toshk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2023, 12:42 PM   #3605
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by douglasf13 View Post
None of the watch media outlets will report on it, particularly since they’re all riding in the wake of the Rolex hype-train over the last five years. Plus, many buyers don’t pay attention to the time keeping of their watches, and some don’t even set their watch at all, since they’ve got a more accurate timekeeper in their pocket (or they rotate between several watches.)
The latter is certainly true. Many buyers just want a Rolex because of the style and hype in the last few years. A watch, after all, isn't really the time-keeping essential it once was. No wonder the super fake market is doing so well; It looks like the high end watch of your choice, who cares if it can't keep time for shit. Which leads me to the 32XX... I mean heck, if it can't keep time for shit why even buy a real Rolex? I wish Rolex would take this an existential threat to the brand, which if it really hit the mainstream it would be. Rolex is coasting on decades of reputation for rugged, reliable and accurate movements. Yet we have actual Rolex watchmakers on this forum saying they wouldn't touch a 32XX movement. THAT indicates a few problems. One is that they know something is amiss. And the other is that even with their ability to work on the movement they aren't interested in doing so with their own personal watch.

It's like exotic cars. I like them as much as the next person but if a mechanic said they would never own a particular one...
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2023, 12:46 PM   #3606
sheldonsmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
sheldonsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,815
Icon18

Quote:
Originally Posted by csaltphoto View Post
The latter is certainly true. Many buyers just want a Rolex because of the style and hype in the last few years. A watch, after all, isn't really the time-keeping essential it once was. No wonder the super fake market is doing so well; It looks like the high end watch of your choice, who cares if it can't keep time for shit. Which leads me to the 32XX... I mean heck, if it can't keep time for shit why even buy a real Rolex? I wish Rolex would take this an existential threat to the brand, which if it really hit the mainstream it would be. Rolex is coasting on decades of reputation for rugged, reliable and accurate movements. Yet we have actual Rolex watchmakers on this forum saying they wouldn't touch a 32XX movement. THAT indicates a few problems. One is that they know something is amiss. And the other is that even with their ability to work on the movement they aren't interested in doing so with their own personal watch.

It's like exotic cars. I like them as much as the next person but if a mechanic said they would never own a particular one...
Amen!
__________________
sheldonsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 08:01 AM   #3607
swexlin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: West Chester PA
Posts: 423
My 2021 DSSD is still at RSC NY - 5 weeks now, for this issue, hopefully comes back soon.

As an interesting side note: I have a 2022 Tudor GMT Diet Pepsi, and a 2022 Tudor BB 925. Both purchased from AD in Feb 22. Until 2 weeks ago, both ran about +1 or 2 spd fast.

Now, they both are running -6 to 8 slow. What the actual EFF?

Not dropped, bumped, zip. Wearing habits the same. The 925 is worse, I may take it back to the AD for warranty service. How do they run excellent for a year, and then suddenly go slow.
swexlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 08:32 AM   #3608
dchernikoff
"TRF" Member
 
dchernikoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by swexlin View Post
My 2021 DSSD is still at RSC NY - 5 weeks now, for this issue, hopefully comes back soon.

As an interesting side note: I have a 2022 Tudor GMT Diet Pepsi, and a 2022 Tudor BB 925. Both purchased from AD in Feb 22. Until 2 weeks ago, both ran about +1 or 2 spd fast.

Now, they both are running -6 to 8 slow. What the actual EFF?

Not dropped, bumped, zip. Wearing habits the same. The 925 is worse, I may take it back to the AD for warranty service. How do they run excellent for a year, and then suddenly go slow.
Lubrication problem, perhaps? Not enough, or improperly applied, so it disappated (or whatever lubricating oil does in a watch over time)?

-Dan
__________________
Watches: GMT-II Coke series K; DJ36 SS white-dial & Roulette date; 126610LV Starbucks
Wife's watch: DJ31 RG/SS, diamond dial, diamond bezel
--
"Wear the watch, don't let the watch wear you!"
dchernikoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 09:20 AM   #3609
Easy E
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well

Well expect now there are around 2000000 plus 32 movements in this world today, and seeing that most all Rolex watches are hard to get even with the 32 movement inside. Ask yourself this if the 32 movement is so bad as some like to portray why do they still sell everyone they make.
Instagram sheeple gobbling up the latest and greatest is precisely zero indication of the quality under the hood. You do realize a RSC watchmaker forum member stated he wouldn’t own one just yet, “too many problems,” I recall were his exact words.
Easy E is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 12:01 PM   #3610
Tridor
"TRF" Member
 
Tridor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well

Well expect now there are around 2000000 plus 32 movements in this world today, and seeing that most all Rolex watches are hard to get even with the 32 movement inside. Ask yourself this if the 32 movement is so bad as some like to portray why do they still sell everyone they make.
Perhaps it is because approximately 99.99% of those buyers simply want a Rolex as a status symbol or piece of jewelry. They aren't concerned about accuracy and precision like us WIS's.
__________________
"Never complain about the air-conditioning on a private jet." - Michael Nesmith
Tridor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 05:04 PM   #3611
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by csaltphoto View Post
The latter is certainly true. Many buyers just want a Rolex because of the style and hype in the last few years. A watch, after all, isn't really the time-keeping essential it once was. No wonder the super fake market is doing so well; It looks like the high end watch of your choice, who cares if it can't keep time for shit. Which leads me to the 32XX... I mean heck, if it can't keep time for shit why even buy a real Rolex? I wish Rolex would take this an existential threat to the brand, which if it really hit the mainstream it would be. Rolex is coasting on decades of reputation for rugged, reliable and accurate movements. Yet we have actual Rolex watchmakers on this forum saying they wouldn't touch a 32XX movement. THAT indicates a few problems. One is that they know something is amiss. And the other is that even with their ability to work on the movement they aren't interested in doing so with their own personal watch.

It's like exotic cars. I like them as much as the next person but if a mechanic said they would never own a particular one...
Agreed.
There's plenty of other far more pleasurable pursuits to waste our time and money on
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2023, 11:20 PM   #3612
swexlin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: West Chester PA
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by dchernikoff View Post
Lubrication problem, perhaps? Not enough, or improperly applied, so it disappated (or whatever lubricating oil does in a watch over time)?

-Dan
Yes, I'm stumped. I can see if the watches had been sitting for a long time, but they are in regular rotation.
swexlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 12:09 AM   #3613
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
32xx movement problem poll and data thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy E View Post
You do realize a RSC watchmaker forum member stated he wouldn’t own one just yet, “too many problems,” I recall were his exact words.
That's what he posted on 27/02/2023:

"I'm not buying a 32×× Rolex anytime soon, 31×× is still quite a bit more reliable. Unfortunately there's still issues with this movement…"
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 08:52 AM   #3614
Tridor
"TRF" Member
 
Tridor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
Was having a discussion about the 32xx with an AD yesterday. He admitted, off the record, that they had seen an inordinate amount of warranty work on those movements. When I told him that I wasn't a fan of the 32xx, he said "I'm not, either." Of course, he and I agreed that we "never had this conversation."
__________________
"Never complain about the air-conditioning on a private jet." - Michael Nesmith
Tridor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 03:56 PM   #3615
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
I have an $18 quartz Casio that is more accurate then my Rolex. I still like the Rolex better
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 05:30 PM   #3616
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
32xx movement problem poll and data thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
I have an $18 quartz Casio that is more accurate then my Rolex. I still like the Rolex better
Paul, you still have not started your timegrapher course with Charles. He also offers English

saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 06:27 PM   #3617
CharlesN
"TRF" Member
 
CharlesN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The UK
Watch: I love them all.
Posts: 1,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
I have an $18 quartz Casio that is more accurate then my Rolex. I still like the Rolex better
I will be happy to give lessons in the use of a TimeGrapher.

But ………. I will have to be very strict though.

I would only grant you your diploma after you prove that you can take data readings with PRECISION and your your graphs were ACCURATE.
__________________
Regards,
CharlesN
Member of the IWJG.
CharlesN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 07:59 PM   #3618
JMGoodnight369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 373
I just got back my 124060 from RSC NYC on Thursday. It was up there since February first. I got the watch back in February 22 brand new from the AD and it ran slow out of the box. About -4.5 if I wore it 24/7 and kept -2.5 if I rested dial up. I took it by RSC when I was there on a trip to have them regulate it and they told me the bad news that it had low amplitude and needed a service. The associate said it was around 200 in dial up. I don’t have a timegrapher but I do use the watch tracker app and I saw that watch consistently lose time from the day I got it. I’ll post up some data from the app in a week or two. It’s such a bummer these watches run like this. My 126610LV is a weird one to track too. Sometimes it’s dead on gaining zero a day and then some days it will randomly drop even though I wear it the same. I’ve considered trading back to 31xx watches but I think I’m gonna hold out and hope they find a fix. The upgrades from the 11 series subs are worth it to me in both looks and wear.
JMGoodnight369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 09:01 PM   #3619
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesN View Post
I will be happy to give lessons in the use of a TimeGrapher.

But ………. I will have to be very strict though.

I would only grant you your diploma after you prove that you can take data readings with PRECISION and your your graphs were ACCURATE.
OK, sounds great!

How do I hook up the timegraper to my Casio?
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2023, 11:43 PM   #3620
CharlesN
"TRF" Member
 
CharlesN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The UK
Watch: I love them all.
Posts: 1,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
OK, sounds great!

How do I hook up the timegraper to my Casio?
Scotch will usually help with everything.

I, of course, mean the sticky tape variant not the delightful nectar.

__________________
Regards,
CharlesN
Member of the IWJG.
CharlesN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 12:28 AM   #3621
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
How do I hook up the timegraper to my Casio?
Very easy, use a Quartzmaster.

Under accessories one finds what you also need: "a battery dummy set".



https://www.witschi.com/en/products/quartzmaster-2/
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 12:54 AM   #3622
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
32xx movement problem poll and data thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGoodnight369 View Post
I just got back my 124060 from RSC NYC on Thursday. It was up there since February first. I got the watch back in February 22 brand new from the AD and it ran slow out of the box. About -4.5 if I wore it 24/7 and kept -2.5 if I rested dial up. I took it by RSC when I was there on a trip to have them regulate it and they told me the bad news that it had low amplitude and needed a service. The associate said it was around 200 in dial up. I don’t have a timegrapher but I do use the watch tracker app and I saw that watch consistently lose time from the day I got it. I’ll post up some data from the app in a week or two. It’s such a bummer these watches run like this. My 126610LV is a weird one to track too. Sometimes it’s dead on gaining zero a day and then some days it will randomly drop even though I wear it the same. I’ve considered trading back to 31xx watches but I think I’m gonna hold out and hope they find a fix. The upgrades from the 11 series subs are worth it to me in both looks and wear.
The 3230 movement (introduced in 2020) of your 124060 Submariner (no date) had low amplitude (200 degrees in DU after full winding) only 12 months after purchase in February 2022?

What are the amplitude and rate values now after repair?
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 02:05 AM   #3623
JMGoodnight369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
The 3230 movement (introduced in 2020) of your 124060 Submariner (no date) had low amplitude (200 degrees in DU after full winding) only 12 months after purchase in February 2022?

What are the amplitude and rate values now after repair?
It had low amplitude after 8 months of owning it. I had taken two trips to NYC Rolex service. The first being back in October of 2022 and that’s when I took it in thinking it just needed a regulation. That’s when they told me it had the low amplitudes. Low 200s. So they regulated it and gave it back and said if it gets slow again to bring it back. It did within 3 months so I dropped it off February 1. Got it back this past Thursday with no information other than “check movement” on the service slip. I don’t have a timegrapher to record amplitude but I’ve been tracking it the past couple days and it’s at +1.1 since Thursday afternoon. That’s wearing about 14-16 hours and resting DU
JMGoodnight369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 02:14 AM   #3624
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
32xx movement problem poll and data thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGoodnight369 View Post
It had low amplitude after 8 months of owning it. I had taken two trips to NYC Rolex service. The first being back in October of 2022 and that’s when I took it in thinking it just needed a regulation. That’s when they told me it had the low amplitudes. Low 200s. So they regulated it and gave it back and said if it gets slow again to bring it back. It did within 3 months so I dropped it off February 1. Got it back this past Thursday with no information other than “check movement” on the service slip. I don’t have a timegrapher to record amplitude but I’ve been tracking it the past couple days and it’s at +1.1 since Thursday afternoon. That’s wearing about 14-16 hours and resting DU
Thanks for the clarification, it is even worse than I thought.

Don't you think it is worth to spend about 200.- USD for a timegrapher and check your watch now (after repair) and every few months later?

I'm pretty sure RSC NY could not fix the problem, just my opinion.
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 03:06 AM   #3625
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
Thanks for the clarification, it is even worse than I thought.
I knew it was worse than we thought when 32xx's come in and have no wear at all, yet run terrible.
Or when you serviced one and it's perfectly lubricated, yet it cannot even reach 200 degrees fully wound dial up...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 03:34 AM   #3626
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
I knew it was worse than we thought when 32xx's come in and have no wear at all, yet run terrible.
Understood, you wrote that (no visible wear) in your thread "Taking a look at the 3235" (post 256).

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
Or when you serviced one and it's perfectly lubricated, yet it cannot even reach 200 degrees fully wound dial up...
Very interesting, this I have never heard. You say that you had a freshly serviced (repaired) 3230 movement which cannot reach 200 degrees in DU position after full winding? The amplitudes in the three vertical positions then are only 160-180 degrees?

I am very surprised. What is your explanation? Did you also measure so low amplitudes for a 3235, 3285, or 3255 after a service?
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 04:01 AM   #3627
JMGoodnight369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
Understood, you wrote that (no visible wear) in your thread "Taking a look at the 3235" (post 256).


Very interesting, this I have never heard. You say that you had a freshly serviced (repaired) 3230 movement which cannot reach 200 degrees in DU position after full winding? The amplitudes in the three vertical positions then are only 160-180 degrees?

I am very surprised. What is your explanation? Did you also measure so low amplitudes for a 3235, 3285, or 3255 after a service?
Yeah I’ll actually look at them to buy. I avoided back when I started collecting as I’m one of those people that get obsessive with keeping track of accuracy so I knew getting a timegrapher would be a black hole for me. It would be handy to have with two 32xx movements. Also I agree with you that they probably didn’t fix it. I’m sure it was just a bandaid. I spoke with a watchmaker here in Ga last year. Charlie Shi is his name and he had a very long career (30+ years) and a watchmaker and then went out on his own. Anyway I had a long conversation with him about the 32xx and he absolutely hates them and said it’ll never work. Apparently Patek gave the chronenergy escapement a shot back in the 70s and it only last one reference and then they abandoned it. I know a lot on here talk about it being lubricant based issues but he argued that it is the design of the pallet fork and jewels. He actually showed me a photo of one he had worked on and it looked to be there was chips on the escapement wheel. I’ll see if I can find that photo still
JMGoodnight369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 04:37 AM   #3628
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3 View Post
Understood, you wrote that (no visible wear) in your thread "Taking a look at the 3235" (post 256).


Very interesting, this I have never heard. You say that you had a freshly serviced (repaired) 3230 movement which cannot reach 200 degrees in DU position after full winding? The amplitudes in the three vertical positions then are only 160-180 degrees?

I am very surprised. What is your explanation? Did you also measure so low amplitudes for a 3235, 3285, or 3255 after a service?
Not specific to the 3230, I've unfortunately seen this on all types. Amplitude is checked before the date mechanism is assembled.

The plan of action is to start with replacing the balance staff, then pallet fork, escape wheel, rest of the gear train.
Pallet fork and balance staff replacement usually get me enough amplitude to barely reach tolerance...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 05:04 AM   #3629
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
32xx movement problem poll and data thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
The plan of action is to start with replacing the balance staff, then pallet fork, escape wheel, rest of the gear train.
Pallet fork and balance staff replacement usually get me enough amplitude to barely reach tolerance...
OMG, so you first dismantle the entire movement, clean everything in an ultrasound bath, then re-assemble with 'perfect' lubrications, then measure too low amplitudes and afterwards you must change one piece/component after the other (although you do not see any signs of wear) until you get acceptable amplitudes? Is that what you have to do?

Barely reach tolerances? What are the amplitude tolerances (H- and V- positions) after a service? I am curious to know these numbers (for my 32xx watches, two need a repair).

Bas, many thanks for all these information and explications, very interesting and much appreciated.
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 March 2023, 05:12 AM   #3630
EEpro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,243
Well if there was any doubt at all. Geez.
__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 16 (0 members and 16 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.