ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30 August 2024, 04:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 487
|
No hate..just curios..why did NASA decide to take the Omega Speedy over Rolex ?
Just watched "First Man" movie on Netflix last night and loved the history and the moon landing bit....tons of camera shots for the speedy as well.
Just curious..what made NASA choose the omega speedy as the moon watch over Rolex when all the popular models like daytona, Explorer, sub, gmt were readily available in 1960s? Was it the hand winding on the speedy that made more sense up in space? I've owned several Omega in the past (smp old and current gen, planet ocean, Aquaterra) and love the brand ...I had to sell most of it to fund my sub date. Cheers. |
30 August 2024, 04:23 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,260
|
I thought I read somewhere that Omega had better results but Rolex also passed the tests.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
30 August 2024, 04:31 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: El Cerrito, CA
Posts: 2,236
|
Because Rolex watch failed the NASA test. I can't recall exactly what failed tho.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk |
30 August 2024, 05:08 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,418
|
|
30 August 2024, 05:10 AM | #5 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,418
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2024, 05:11 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SF
Posts: 32
|
Rolex – It stopped running on two occasions during the Relative Humidity Test and subsequently failed during High Temperature Test No. 1 when the sweep second hand warped and was binding against the other hands on the dial. No further tests were run with the Rolex chronographs
|
30 August 2024, 05:17 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Michigan, US
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2024, 05:31 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
The Speedmaster caliber 321 passed all the tests.
A great read from Fratello. https://www.fratellowatches.com/the-...-watches/#gref |
30 August 2024, 05:33 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 4,182
|
Some interesting information
|
30 August 2024, 05:39 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
|
I thought I read somewhere that the Hesalite was a benefit for Omega because it wouldn’t shatter and splinter with small pieces floating around in zero gravity. Can’t swear to that though.
|
30 August 2024, 05:43 AM | #11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
|
No hate..just curios..why did NASA decide to take the Omega Speedy over Rolex ?
A legend was born (and a milk cow for Omega :chuckle )
Quote:
Thanks for sharing Brian ! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
30 August 2024, 05:51 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
|
30 August 2024, 05:53 AM | #13 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
|
Quote:
This thread needs pictures! Where’s that magnificent 321 Brian?? In the meantime here is my humble 3861 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
30 August 2024, 06:06 AM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
Quote:
Nothing humble about that my friend. Arguably has the “better” movement I submit the 321 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
30 August 2024, 06:10 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
NASA had stipulated as part of their key requirements/preconditions for contenders of the series of tests, that the watches simply had to have the capability of being manually wound. That is an inescapable fact and one would imagine it was for a very important reason when one stops to think about it. |
|
30 August 2024, 06:11 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 1,139
|
All the watches had plastic crystals then. Rolex didn’t intrude the sapphire crystal until around 1988.
|
30 August 2024, 06:14 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
|
|
30 August 2024, 06:17 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
There was one instance where a glass instrument cover broke and the crew spent hours going around vaccuming up every square inch of the interior of the craft to try to mitigate the risk of floating glass fragments ruining the party. They apparently did take it most seriously when all things are taken into consideration. |
|
30 August 2024, 06:19 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 375
|
for NASA these watches were to be used as backup timers should the onboard systems fail. So they tested multiple watches under various pressure and temperature to ensure they maintained function and kept good time. Speedmaster was the only one that passed.
Fun fact, Rolex put Cosmograph on the Daytona because they were certain they would be selected. |
30 August 2024, 06:20 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
Keep in mind that watches had glass crystals before polymers/plastics were even thought of. Take my Grandfather's pocket watch from 1911 for example |
|
30 August 2024, 06:27 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
Interesting I also imagine that the wrist watch was intended to be a key part of their basic kit for any EVA's. As far as i know, it still is which is a key consideration and more importantly it has to be a mechanical watch of some description in that instance. |
|
30 August 2024, 06:28 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 313
|
NASA Couldn't wait 2-3 years for an allocation from Rolex AD. :D
|
30 August 2024, 06:31 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
When everybody knows that the real reason why NASA chose the Omega offering was simply because the 321 was the prettiest movement out of the whole bunch |
|
30 August 2024, 06:32 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
|
30 August 2024, 06:33 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
|
30 August 2024, 06:50 AM | #26 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,181
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
30 August 2024, 07:43 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Huntsville, AL
Watch: BB58 925, OP39, DD
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2024, 07:57 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,749
|
Quote:
__________________
Never place your happiness on something you have or can physically acquire |
|
30 August 2024, 07:59 AM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NWA, USA
Watch: BLRO/Daytona/OP41s
Posts: 5,387
|
My tiny link to the NASA saga is that I bought my first two Rolex from Corrigans Jewelers in Houston. NASA bought their test subjects anonymously from the local AD to avoid any ringers being thrown out by the manufacturers. That local chain has been gone for decades now.
|
30 August 2024, 08:31 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
|
Quote:
"Redundancy" my friend. It was and remains a risky endeavour and having manual winders is the epidimy of having back up if one is sporting an Automatic. Especially when the chips are down. Keep in mind we currently live in a horoligical world that's awash with the ubiquitous bi-directional Auto winders. It wasn't always the case and as you note. Autos weren't common. But certainly not excluded from the selection process. Also there was a requirement driven by the Astronauts, to formalise a standard for the timpieces to be used because a number of different (personal) watches were being worn. Astronauts were already using Speedies, and as a result they were familiar with them as a useful tool and they were a bit of a favourite as far as i know. The fact remains everything was done for good reason to maximise the possibilty of launching into space, sending a man to the moon, landing and walking on the moon and returning them safely to Earth. The Speedy was the front runner and winner for all the right reasons. I put it to you that it certainly would have been a consideration at the time because NASA stipulated that the movement had to have a manual winding capability. It was indeed, fully factored in when all things are taken into consideration. Besides. The 321 movement was exceptionally easy on the eye just like the Corvette |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.