ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 November 2024, 04:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
6426: Case shape is interesting...
I'm looking at 6426's and other Oyster's and came across this one. Not necessarily considering it, but the price is cheap ($1.8K). One thing that stood out immediately is how thick the lugs are. They seem too wide and misshaped...and the case seems like it's in far too good of condition.
It looks abnormal compared to my 34mm cased Tudor Oyster and all other 6426's that I've seen. Am I making sense or completely off? |
26 November 2024, 05:19 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,719
|
.
I think the watch is fine. The issue may be the bracelet. Possibly a 17mm bracelet or the largest links to the case removed w/19mm ends.. |
26 November 2024, 05:31 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,272
|
Looks normal to me.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
26 November 2024, 05:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
|
26 November 2024, 05:42 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,719
|
Does not look right. See here and compare on the net..
. |
26 November 2024, 09:34 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,996
|
Yes, the bracelet is missing its largest link
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
26 November 2024, 02:19 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,959
|
6426: Case shape is interesting...
It could be missing its first link on both sides - or more probable - the bracelet isn't the original one at all - and from a different model with narrower lugs.
Looks like a 17mm bracelet to me - but the picture doesn't help since it's not showing the clasp and rear view. Vintage Rolex watches with a 17mm lug width had folded link Oyster bracelets. Maybe from an older Oyster Precision? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
27 November 2024, 01:27 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
Thanks all, appreciate the eyes. The more that I look at these the more I realize they used a different case than the Tudor Oysters of the same era. The Rolex cases have a slightly different shape, and thicker lugs. I always assumed (wrongly) that they were the same case across the 34mm models. Interestingly, the Rolex OP's also seem to have a slightly thinner case (like the Tudors) than the manual wound Oysters like the 6426.
The 6426 above has thicker lugs than the OP and Tudor below suggesting a different case design. |
2 December 2024, 12:44 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
For anyone who has been hands on with both an Air King and a 6426/7, can you please describe how the case shape differs between the two? I kind of like the the slightly thicker case of the 6426/7’s.
|
2 December 2024, 05:04 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,149
|
there are various case shapes, particularly the Tudor models; from very slim to chunky for the automatic models. My 7909 is particularly thick.
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
2 December 2024, 11:49 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,996
|
We are also talking about watches from 80 years ago. A lot of the examples have been heavily polished and with the current trend of laser welding lugs, who knows what is correct and what isnt anymore. Scrupulous sellers may build lugs back up bigger than they are supposed to be in order to appeal to buyers who own current models, who are used to larger lugs.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
3 December 2024, 12:19 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,719
|
Here is side view.
. |
3 December 2024, 01:19 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
|
|
3 December 2024, 01:20 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
|
3 December 2024, 01:29 AM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,272
|
Quote:
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
|
3 December 2024, 01:58 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,719
|
|
3 December 2024, 02:12 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
|
3 December 2024, 02:42 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,996
|
The lugs on that Air King look to be polished down to a nub. So close to the pin hole
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
3 December 2024, 03:35 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
|
|
Today, 10:48 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Albany
Watch: 1970 Air King 5500
Posts: 50
|
There is no question the shapes of Oysters within 34 mm are different.
Your 6426 case is much like the of my 6494 with thicker lugs. The case back is flatter as well which makes the watch sit lower on my wrist in comparison to my 5500 and my 15010. I also can say my Tudor 7904 has thicker lugs than both my 7909 and my 7965. However the 7905 has extended lugs and it make the 34mm 7965 look more like a 36mm. This is great discussion for 34mm Rolex and Tudor collectors. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
Dan S |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.