ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 November 2009, 12:27 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
|
166713 vs 16613K - Pros/Cons?
I'm struggling!
Recently I decided on the GMTIIc. Beautiful watch, considering the TT jubilee bracelet, etc. etc. I've got great people looking (Thanks Steve M)! Yesterday running around with the lovely bride, we checked out some Subs and there was a 16613K. She loved it - as did I. (That's where the problem started) I wasn't able to do a side-by-side comparison but now I'm vacillating! Subs are ubiquitous (I see them everywhere); GMTIIc I don't see everywhere. Subs are cheaper (but not by THAT much) IMO. Back and forth, back and forth - no wonder I have a headache! I'd appreciate any and all comments - thanks. |
15 November 2009, 12:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
GMT hands down
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
15 November 2009, 12:57 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
|
gmtii,
larger lugs maxi dial ceramic bezel better bracelet/clasp more complications |
15 November 2009, 01:58 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
|
I have both. If you travel or want to keep track of another time zone there isn't any question that the GMT IIc is the winner. You can also use the bezel as a timer if a minute or two isn't important.
The sub is lighter and to my eye less busy. It is easier to use the bezel for a timer. If I had to choose one I'd go with the GMT IIc. I wish I had it when my son-in-law was in Iraq. I always wondered what time it was there! |
15 November 2009, 03:01 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
Apples and Oranges..
You are comparing the discontinued TT Sub with the latest ceramic GMT.. Why not compare the latest TT ceramic Sub with the GMT ??? Although I like the older GMT, the new one and it's overall look I think falls off and is too much bling. I would take the TT Black Sub, every time...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
15 November 2009, 03:04 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: Texas
Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN
Posts: 453
|
I travel and the GMT suits me well, I also love the looks of the GMT IIc. I don't know how important the new upgrades from Rolex are for you but they are updating the Submariner next yr....IMHO, I believe Rolex hit a homerun with the new updates on the GMT IIc and Submariner Ceramic due out in 2010.
|
15 November 2009, 03:05 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Hi Steve,
What matters is what you like seeing on YOUR wrist. My first Rolex purchase was a Y-Series Sub Date. Pretty common watch...but man, do I love looking at it on MY wrist! I see you are in Tampa, where I understand Rolexes are EVERYWHERE so I do see some of your point... Good luck with your decision. |
15 November 2009, 03:07 AM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
The TT ceramic Sub is out now...with the killer glidelock clasp..
I think that the TT Black ceramic Sub is head and shoulders above the TT GMT IIc.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
15 November 2009, 03:15 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
|
|
15 November 2009, 03:34 AM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
The GMT IIc does not have a glidelock clasp.. They are only on the new ceramic Subs and Deep Sea..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
15 November 2009, 05:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Mechanical!!
Posts: 807
|
Larry makes a valid point re: the new clasp...but I'd still go with the GMT.
|
15 November 2009, 06:07 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
|
invalid comparison --- diving watch compared to time zone watch .... apples to oranges ...
But 16613 screams ROLEX from across the room!!! Recognized the world over .... |
15 November 2009, 06:25 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Way Up North USA
Watch: Rolexes & Tudors
Posts: 6,361
|
I think the Submariner is less busy and more understated. Also, if you scuba dive, it is a great watch to back up your dive computer, and it's much less likely to fail on a dive. Of course, I'm biased....
|
15 November 2009, 07:08 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
|
Thank you everyone for the input, keep it coming!
My diving days are over! Grew up in Miami and Key West. I now "dive" a desk on a college campus here in Tampa. It's only Apples and Oranges if you KNOW THE DIFFERENCE between Apples and Oranges. As a newbie searching for his first Rolex, I'm still leaning towards the GMTII with or without the new bracelet on the Submariner. I just think it stands out MORE and as many of you have stated, it's what I want that matters. With a budget of 5K(ish) I'm leaning towards the GMT. Thank you again, this is a GREAT forum and I appreciate the wisdom of the members! |
15 November 2009, 07:38 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I'd take the TT black sub everytime....old style or new ceramic style.
Good luck! |
15 November 2009, 08:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Joshua R Asch
Location: NY, Brooklyn
Watch: Sub
Posts: 293
|
TT Black Sub All THE WAY !!!!
__________________
JRA |
15 November 2009, 08:53 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US
Watch: Submariner TT
Posts: 197
|
Rolex has "redesigned" GMT IIc, it has much smoother dial. Bigger markers, different bracelet. So I'll say no comparison, new one looks so amazing but comes with big bucks :)
|
15 November 2009, 09:04 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
|
Have Them both!
Like with my children, I can't choose between them!!! |
15 November 2009, 09:07 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Mohammed
Location: Kuwait
Watch: @kuwaitinglist
Posts: 1,622
|
Sorry but I vote GMT this time.
|
11 February 2010, 09:10 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jan
Location: Czech republic
Watch: GMT Master II C
Posts: 56
|
i had same problem, i decided between GMT Master II TT and Submariner TT the new model with bigger lugs - price almost same. I chose the GMT, because I think i will use the second timezone sometimes and I prefere the 24h bezel before the submariner diving bezel. Jan
__________________
RLX 4EVER |
11 February 2010, 09:17 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
|
I went with the TT GMT II. It's a beautful watch and I LOVE IT!!
|
11 February 2010, 09:19 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
ive got the black tt sub and love it. the gmtc TT black would be my 2nd choice. the sub is less bling imo, and being smaller and lighter, will be more confortable to wear. suits my smaller wrist too!
anyone else notice the sub in the 1st post, the date is at 22, yet it looks like a rolex stock photo?? |
11 February 2010, 09:23 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
sorry double post
|
11 February 2010, 09:27 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Michigan
Watch: for that TRF bug!!
Posts: 275
|
Already having had a Coke GMT II...I went with the TT Sub Ceramic as a new addition....so it isn't the same situation...to make a choice from...
But I'm not real fond of the 4th hand....the less busy look is preferable to me now... I'll tell you what I can guarantee you though....either one you choose is going to look SWEET on that wrist of yours!!!
__________________
|
11 February 2010, 09:37 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
+1. However, if the comparison was between the TT Sub Ceramic and the TT GMT IIC, then they're close. But I'd still get the GMT, since it's less ubiquitous, and I prefer busier dials and busier bezels.
|
12 February 2010, 01:54 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
The only reason I don't like the new TT GMT's and black dialed Submariner is the white font. See how pretty the font looks on Steve's 16713? What's interesting is that the blue dial 116613 has gold font, whereas the black dial has white font. Both now have the white date wheel - I prefer the linen. I also prefer the older lug style, but would love to have the newer bracelet!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
12 February 2010, 02:04 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
|
It's a tough call, Steve, but I agree with Larry. I'd take a look at the new TT Sub and compare that with the TT GMT. I have to say, though, given the choices you presented us with, I'd go with the GMT. JJ alone has really sold me on this watch. For me, the Submariner is always better served in its SS form.
|
12 February 2010, 02:10 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
|
12 February 2010, 02:13 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
Oh, and hate to nit pick, but I don't believe the II-c was ever available with the jubilee. Although it would be nice
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.