The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 15 November 2009, 12:27 AM   #1
OrchidDR
"TRF" Member
 
OrchidDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
166713 vs 16613K - Pros/Cons?

I'm struggling!

Recently I decided on the GMTIIc. Beautiful watch, considering the TT jubilee bracelet, etc. etc. I've got great people looking (Thanks Steve M)!

Yesterday running around with the lovely bride, we checked out some Subs and there was a 16613K. She loved it - as did I. (That's where the problem started)

I wasn't able to do a side-by-side comparison but now I'm vacillating!

Subs are ubiquitous (I see them everywhere); GMTIIc I don't see everywhere.

Subs are cheaper (but not by THAT much) IMO.

Back and forth, back and forth - no wonder I have a headache!

I'd appreciate any and all comments - thanks.
Attached Images
   
OrchidDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 12:29 AM   #2
chenx15
"TRF" Member
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
GMT hands down
__________________
16 GS Titles
16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi)
23 Consecutive GS semifinals
17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1
5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups
5 consecutive US open
4 Australian open
1 Sweet french open
a crown for every achievement
The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex
chenx15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 12:57 AM   #3
icnbne
"TRF" Member
 
icnbne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
gmtii,
larger lugs
maxi dial
ceramic bezel
better bracelet/clasp
more complications
icnbne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 01:58 AM   #4
jrssv
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
I have both. If you travel or want to keep track of another time zone there isn't any question that the GMT IIc is the winner. You can also use the bezel as a timer if a minute or two isn't important.

The sub is lighter and to my eye less busy. It is easier to use the bezel for a timer.

If I had to choose one I'd go with the GMT IIc. I wish I had it when my son-in-law was in Iraq. I always wondered what time it was there!
jrssv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:01 AM   #5
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Apples and Oranges..

You are comparing the discontinued TT Sub with the latest ceramic GMT..

Why not compare the latest TT ceramic Sub with the GMT ???


Although I like the older GMT, the new one and it's overall look I think falls off and is too much bling.

I would take the TT Black Sub, every time...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:04 AM   #6
cobblecanyon
"TRF" Member
 
cobblecanyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: Texas
Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN
Posts: 453
I travel and the GMT suits me well, I also love the looks of the GMT IIc. I don't know how important the new upgrades from Rolex are for you but they are updating the Submariner next yr....IMHO, I believe Rolex hit a homerun with the new updates on the GMT IIc and Submariner Ceramic due out in 2010.
cobblecanyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:05 AM   #7
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Hi Steve,

What matters is what you like seeing on YOUR wrist. My first Rolex purchase was a Y-Series Sub Date. Pretty common watch...but man, do I love looking at it on MY wrist!

I see you are in Tampa, where I understand Rolexes are EVERYWHERE so I do see some of your point...

Good luck with your decision.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:07 AM   #8
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
The TT ceramic Sub is out now...with the killer glidelock clasp..

I think that the TT Black ceramic Sub is head and shoulders above the TT GMT IIc.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:15 AM   #9
newmedia
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
The TT ceramic Sub is out now...with the killer glidelock clasp..

I think that the TT Black ceramic Sub is head and shoulders above the TT GMT IIc.
how do you adjust the glidelock on GMT2C?
newmedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 03:34 AM   #10
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmedia View Post
how do you adjust the glidelock on GMT2C?
The GMT IIc does not have a glidelock clasp.. They are only on the new ceramic Subs and Deep Sea..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 05:55 AM   #11
Damage Inc.
"TRF" Member
 
Damage Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Mechanical!!
Posts: 807
Larry makes a valid point re: the new clasp...but I'd still go with the GMT.
Damage Inc. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 06:07 AM   #12
rolexsubdate
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
invalid comparison --- diving watch compared to time zone watch .... apples to oranges ...
But 16613 screams ROLEX from across the room!!! Recognized the world over ....
rolexsubdate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 06:25 AM   #13
joeychitwood
"TRF" Member
 
joeychitwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Way Up North USA
Watch: Rolexes & Tudors
Posts: 6,361
I think the Submariner is less busy and more understated. Also, if you scuba dive, it is a great watch to back up your dive computer, and it's much less likely to fail on a dive. Of course, I'm biased....


joeychitwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 07:08 AM   #14
OrchidDR
"TRF" Member
 
OrchidDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
Thank you everyone for the input, keep it coming!
My diving days are over! Grew up in Miami and Key West. I now "dive" a desk on a college campus here in Tampa.

It's only Apples and Oranges if you KNOW THE DIFFERENCE between Apples and Oranges. As a newbie searching for his first Rolex, I'm still leaning towards the GMTII with or without the new bracelet on the Submariner. I just think it stands out MORE and as many of you have stated, it's what I want that matters. With a budget of 5K(ish) I'm leaning towards the GMT.

Thank you again, this is a GREAT forum and I appreciate the wisdom of the members!
OrchidDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 07:38 AM   #15
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
I'd take the TT black sub everytime....old style or new ceramic style.

Good luck!
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 08:01 AM   #16
JRA21
"TRF" Member
 
JRA21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Joshua R Asch
Location: NY, Brooklyn
Watch: Sub
Posts: 293
TT Black Sub All THE WAY !!!!
__________________

JRA
JRA21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 08:53 AM   #17
safwan
"TRF" Member
 
safwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US
Watch: Submariner TT
Posts: 197
Rolex has "redesigned" GMT IIc, it has much smoother dial. Bigger markers, different bracelet. So I'll say no comparison, new one looks so amazing but comes with big bucks :)
safwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 09:04 AM   #18
Sub'erman
"TRF" Member
 
Sub'erman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
Have Them both!
Like with my children, I can't choose between them!!!
Sub'erman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2009, 09:07 AM   #19
MYK
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Mohammed
Location: Kuwait
Watch: @kuwaitinglist
Posts: 1,622
Sorry but I vote GMT this time.
MYK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:10 AM   #20
sibirnaya
"TRF" Member
 
sibirnaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jan
Location: Czech republic
Watch: GMT Master II C
Posts: 56
i had same problem, i decided between GMT Master II TT and Submariner TT the new model with bigger lugs - price almost same. I chose the GMT, because I think i will use the second timezone sometimes and I prefere the 24h bezel before the submariner diving bezel. Jan
__________________
RLX 4EVER
sibirnaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:17 AM   #21
OrchidDR
"TRF" Member
 
OrchidDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
I went with the TT GMT II. It's a beautful watch and I LOVE IT!!
Attached Images
   
OrchidDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:19 AM   #22
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
ive got the black tt sub and love it. the gmtc TT black would be my 2nd choice. the sub is less bling imo, and being smaller and lighter, will be more confortable to wear. suits my smaller wrist too!



anyone else notice the sub in the 1st post, the date is at 22, yet it looks like a rolex stock photo??
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:23 AM   #23
thesharkfactor
"TRF" Member
 
thesharkfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
sorry double post
thesharkfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:27 AM   #24
MURRAY
"TRF" Member
 
MURRAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Michigan
Watch: for that TRF bug!!
Posts: 275
Already having had a Coke GMT II...I went with the TT Sub Ceramic as a new addition....so it isn't the same situation...to make a choice from...

But I'm not real fond of the 4th hand....the less busy look is preferable to me now...

I'll tell you what I can guarantee you though....either one you choose is going to look SWEET on that wrist of yours!!!

__________________
MURRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 February 2010, 09:37 AM   #25
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by children View Post
gmtii,
larger lugs
maxi dial
ceramic bezel
better bracelet/clasp
more complications
+1. However, if the comparison was between the TT Sub Ceramic and the TT GMT IIC, then they're close. But I'd still get the GMT, since it's less ubiquitous, and I prefer busier dials and busier bezels.
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2010, 01:54 AM   #26
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
The only reason I don't like the new TT GMT's and black dialed Submariner is the white font. See how pretty the font looks on Steve's 16713? What's interesting is that the blue dial 116613 has gold font, whereas the black dial has white font. Both now have the white date wheel - I prefer the linen. I also prefer the older lug style, but would love to have the newer bracelet!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2010, 02:04 AM   #27
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
It's a tough call, Steve, but I agree with Larry. I'd take a look at the new TT Sub and compare that with the TT GMT. I have to say, though, given the choices you presented us with, I'd go with the GMT. JJ alone has really sold me on this watch. For me, the Submariner is always better served in its SS form.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2010, 02:10 AM   #28
sakuraba
"TRF" Member
 
sakuraba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrchidDR View Post
I went with the TT GMT II. It's a beautful watch and I LOVE IT!!
Congratulations, Steve!

I thought you were going for the TT II-c, but that is just as nice IMO
sakuraba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 February 2010, 02:13 AM   #29
sakuraba
"TRF" Member
 
sakuraba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrchidDR View Post
I'm struggling!

Recently I decided on the GMTIIc. Beautiful watch, considering the TT jubilee bracelet, etc. etc. I've got great people looking (Thanks Steve M)!
Oh, and hate to nit pick, but I don't believe the II-c was ever available with the jubilee. Although it would be nice
sakuraba is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.