The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 24 December 2009, 01:07 AM   #1
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Why the "T" disclosure for Tritium...

I am not near my Mondani Submariner Story Book...thought I would ask...

Why did Rolex label their dials / feel the need to point out their dials were made with Tritium? In retrospect, the T designation on dials makes it nice to ID vintage pieces, but what was the original intent? Was it because Tritium is a dangerous material or??
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:13 AM   #2
winged wheel
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
I'll take a stab...

As a nuke worker, I think it's probably because tritium is a radiation source regulated by the NRC, and I would imagine other nations regulatory bodies, as well. If you look at the NRC web sight, half of the industry event are lost or stolen tritium exit signs (walmart being one of the worst offenders). JM $0.02.

Jim
winged wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:22 AM   #3
PhilM
"TRF" Member
 
PhilM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
It's because it's radioactive, therefore it had to be labelled accordingly
PhilM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:24 AM   #4
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Riiiiiiiiight. Thanks!

OK. It's coming back...and the luminosity is now going / gone on many of these prior pieces.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:30 AM   #5
winged wheel
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 164
Tritium half life =

12.33 years. It's bound to fade eventually.
winged wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:36 AM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by masugu View Post
I am not near my Mondani Submariner Story Book...thought I would ask...

Why did Rolex label their dials / feel the need to point out their dials were made with Tritium? In retrospect, the T designation on dials makes it nice to ID vintage pieces, but what was the original intent? Was it because Tritium is a dangerous material or??
At the time it was law to have any radioactive material clearly stated on dial or on any product. The T Swiss T dials contained the radioactive material Tritium but less than 277 MBq [7.5 mCi].The T > 25 dials less than 925 MBq [ 25 mCi].And there were many cases of dial painters getting quite ill using this radioactive materials .They were encouraged to keep a fine point on their paint brushes by licking the brush end.So it was phased out around 1998 for the much safer luminover
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:52 AM   #7
ersnyder
2024 Pledge Member
 
ersnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by winged wheel View Post
12.33 years. It's bound to fade eventually.
My '89 Exp II is now completely dead. When I first got it about 12 years ago it had some short life to the glow.
ersnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 01:52 AM   #8
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Thanks Padi, WW.

Great explanation on the T > 25. I was going to ask Padi.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 02:12 AM   #9
RebreatherDiver
"TRF" Member
 
RebreatherDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Greater Boston
Watch: Rotational
Posts: 666
Quote:
Originally Posted by winged wheel View Post
12.33 years. It's bound to fade eventually.
Yep, no escaping the T 1/2
RebreatherDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2009, 05:46 AM   #10
larrysb
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
At the time it was law to have any radioactive material clearly stated on dial or on any product. The T Swiss T dials contained the radioactive material Tritium but less than 277 MBq [7.5 mCi].The T > 25 dials less than 925 MBq [ 25 mCi].And there were many cases of dial painters getting quite ill using this radioactive materials .They were encouraged to keep a fine point on their paint brushes by licking the brush end.So it was phased out around 1998 for the much safer luminover
Uhh, this is absolutely NOT true.

The problem with watch and instrument dial painters was not with tritium, but with RADIUM. It was the "radium girls" case that you are thinking of. Google it, you'll find the details.

Radium produces lots of high-energy decay and is quite dangerous on exposure or worse, ingestion. Radium is radioactive for thousands of years, even though the glowing paint fades in a couple of decades. The radioactive particles banging into the paint degrade and destroy it into a brown, non-glowing mess.

Tritium has an excellent safety record and as far as I can tell, there are no proven cases of a single person injured by tritiated paint for watch illumination. Tritiated paint is no longer available, but tritium tubes and microspheres are readily available and still in use. Even when abused and ingested, the actual risk from tritium is exceedingly low. It is a low-energy beta emitter.

The real problem is that tritium has a half-life of 12.6 years. Every 12.6 years, the illumination will halve in brightness. After 25 years, the light output is essentially zero. Also the chemistry is unstable in the long term. The paints in particular will simply degrade and flake and change colors.

The tubes and spheres are very safe and don't chemically fail, but the isotope itself simply decays below useful levels in a couple of decades.

Because of the radiation-phobes, anything radioactive, no matter how slight, is a regulatory nightmare. There are markets too, which will not buy radioactive devices, even if regulatory approval is possible, period.

Luminova (strontium aluminate with europium dopant) has many advantages over the radioactive tritium. It is chemically stable, completely non-toxic and non-hazardous. It lasts forever (more or less). 50 years from now, it should work about as well as it does today. The downside is it must be charged in bright light and it fades fairly rapidly. However, it will last long enough to provide useful illumination to the majority of watch wearers over the night.
larrysb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 05:31 AM   #11
Yoreese
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Maurice
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 212
I miss the look of my tritium dialed Sub!
Yoreese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 05:37 AM   #12
Hawk99
"TRF" Member
 
Hawk99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 388
my 33 year old 1680 has a little life left....

...And I mean little!!
If I wake up in the middle of the night and take a look to see what time it is, I can see a faint glow of the indicies, but bright enough to make it legible.
Very cool!
Hawk99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 05:42 AM   #13
mascot
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UTC/GMT +1 Hours
Watch: 16570
Posts: 250
So you dont need to "load" it with daylight?
mascot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 06:08 AM   #14
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawk99 View Post
...And I mean little!!
If I wake up in the middle of the night and take a look to see what time it is, I can see a faint glow of the indicies, but bright enough to make it legible.
Very cool!

What have happened to the cyclops eye ? Is the acrylic changed with the Non Date or was is rubbed down ?

...and, do you "charge" it ? There were some posts mentioning that owners 'charge" their watches, but I cannot make mine to glow !
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 06:35 AM   #15
Hawk99
"TRF" Member
 
Hawk99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascot View Post
So you dont need to "load" it with daylight?
No, and it doesn't/wouldn't make a difference. Tritium glows on its own due to its radioactivity nature. From what I understand, it is the radioactivity inherent in Tritium which excites the lume and creates a glow. Holding it up to a light does not do anything.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoGio Greece View Post
What have happened to the cyclops eye ? Is the acrylic changed with the Non Date or was is rubbed down ?

...and, do you "charge" it ? There were some posts mentioning that owners 'charge" their watches, but I cannot make mine to glow !
The original 'top hat' crystal (tropic 127) was changed to a dome style (tropic 19) more commonly seen on the 5513. They are interchangeble on the 1680 and 5513. I just didn't care for the cyclops and love the new clean look.
Tritium dials do not take a charge. You could say they are 'self charging', but it does wear out eventually. The newer dials with luminova DO take a charge and are very bright.

Regards,
Hawk99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2010, 06:53 AM   #16
GeoGio Greece
"TRF" Member
 
GeoGio Greece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawk99 View Post
No, and it doesn't/wouldn't make a difference. Tritium glows on its own due to its radioactivity nature. From what I understand, it is the radioactivity inherent in Tritium which excites the lume and creates a glow. Holding it up to a light does not do anything.




The original 'top hat' crystal (tropic 127) was changed to a dome style (tropic 19) more commonly seen on the 5513. They are interchangeble on the 1680 and 5513. I just didn't care for the cyclops and love the new clean look.
Tritium dials do not take a charge. You could say they are 'self charging', but it does wear out eventually. The newer dials with luminova DO take a charge and are very bright.

Regards,
Thank you
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones.

DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series

Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series
GeoGio Greece is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.