The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 5 May 2010, 07:12 AM   #1
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Orient New Mako vs. Orient Mako.

After a year and a little change of being quite happy with my Invicta Pro Diver, tragedy hath struck- it died on me last week. It's proven to not be a battery or anything simple. My jeweler/watchmaker has it now to evaluate it, but I'm betting on it being a dead movement.

It's just out of warranty, and Invicta is being wholly unresponsive. If it's a movement, replacement would cost me about $100 by the time I'm done. With that said, I'm looking at a replacement. This time, I'm going automatic.

I love the look of the Orient Makos, old and new, and with a coupon code I found, I can snag either for under $125. $125 shipped for the 2010 Mako, $95 for the classic.

What are the pros and cons of the 2? I see the different looks, but how does the 2010 Mako justify the price difference?
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 07:23 AM   #2
spuds
"TRF" Member
 
spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
Mate I genuinely mean no disrespect but for a difference of $30 (GBP£20-ish?) wouldn't you be better off just picking the one you like best?!?
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards.

Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb...........
It's about how well you can bounce!!



TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010
spuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 07:30 AM   #3
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
They're a tie, hence the problem. ;-)
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 07:33 AM   #4
spuds
"TRF" Member
 
spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxmoore View Post
They're a tie, hence the problem. ;-)
Sods Law!!

Bet they're both in stock, and locally too.......
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards.

Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb...........
It's about how well you can bounce!!



TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010
spuds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 08:47 AM   #5
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
I wish! There isn't a good watch shop here. The solo Rolex AD is run by a group of morons, same with Omega. Around here, a Timex is as good as it gets for most people.
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 09:22 AM   #6
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
Here is mine. Just bought last month and love it..This might help you...Good luck
Attached Images
 
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2010, 11:02 PM   #7
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
vote for the original mako with 12, 6, 9 numerals... i find it more sleek...
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 01:57 AM   #8
sunburst
"TRF" Member
 
sunburst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Joji
Location: KY, So. Cal., NJ
Watch: 16800
Posts: 979
Mako II has nice updated design however it's quite big.
If you got the wrist go for Mako II otherwise stay with Mako (and get blue).
The only con of Mako is that the bezel is hard to turn due to the small grip area and
fact that the OD of the bezel is slightly smaller compared to the case.

I believe 50% off promo has expired but I'm sure they'll do an another promo soon.

Attached Images
 
__________________
Rolex Sub 16800
Rolex No Date Sub 114060
Omega Speedmaster Professional
Sinn 356 Flieger II, Sinn 556, Sinn ST-140
Marathon SAR, Marathon GSAR
sunburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 02:36 AM   #9
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunburst View Post
Mako II has nice updated design however it's quite big.
If you got the wrist go for Mako II otherwise stay with Mako (and get blue).
The only con of Mako is that the bezel is hard to turn due to the small grip area and
fact that the OD of the bezel is slightly small compared to the case.

I believe 50% off promo has expired but I'm sure they'll do an another promo soon.

The code I have hasn't expired. If it does, looking at Orient on Youtube usually has coupon codes in the videos.

Think I'll go with the Blue Mako if my Invicta is truly DOA. Their watch guy was supposed to look yesterday, but who knows how much backlog the guy has.
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 07:09 AM   #10
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Well, I just got the call. Dead movement, their cost is $78 to fix it. Invicta's cost- $97, not including shipping to get it there!

That Mako's looking pretty good...
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2010, 11:31 PM   #11
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
saw this while surfing... might help
http://www.thewatchsite.com/index.php?topic=199.0
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2010, 01:15 AM   #12
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
after reading up on both makos, i'm now leaning towards the newer mako.. in almost all reviews, the newer mako is built better than the older mako... hmmmm...
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2010, 03:45 AM   #13
Flaxmoore
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
Where did you see that? Everything I have seen (except one outlier) says that the original Mako is basically a tank.
Flaxmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2010, 04:35 AM   #14
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flaxmoore View Post
Where did you see that? Everything I have seen (except one outlier) says that the original Mako is basically a tank.
http://www.thewatchsite.com/index.php?topic=199.0
plus a couple of videos on youtube about the makoI and its bezel (didn't get to take down the link... search Orient Mako and surely a few reviews will pop up)...

not dissing any mako, its just that, in my opinion, the Mako II is built "better" than the original Mako -- "improving" on the Mako I
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 June 2010, 08:09 PM   #15
Deyn Man
"TRF" Member
 
Deyn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deyn Man View Post
http://www.thewatchsite.com/index.php?topic=199.0
plus a couple of videos on youtube about the makoI and its bezel (didn't get to take down the link... search Orient Mako and surely a few reviews will pop up)...

not dissing any mako, its just that, in my opinion, the Mako II is built "better" than the original Mako -- "improving" on the Mako I
got my Hogrider (New Mako) and it just feels awesome! sucky lume though but very much satisfied!
Deyn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.