ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 May 2010, 07:12 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
Orient New Mako vs. Orient Mako.
After a year and a little change of being quite happy with my Invicta Pro Diver, tragedy hath struck- it died on me last week. It's proven to not be a battery or anything simple. My jeweler/watchmaker has it now to evaluate it, but I'm betting on it being a dead movement.
It's just out of warranty, and Invicta is being wholly unresponsive. If it's a movement, replacement would cost me about $100 by the time I'm done. With that said, I'm looking at a replacement. This time, I'm going automatic. I love the look of the Orient Makos, old and new, and with a coupon code I found, I can snag either for under $125. $125 shipped for the 2010 Mako, $95 for the classic. What are the pros and cons of the 2? I see the different looks, but how does the 2010 Mako justify the price difference? |
5 May 2010, 07:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
Mate I genuinely mean no disrespect but for a difference of $30 (GBP£20-ish?) wouldn't you be better off just picking the one you like best?!?
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
5 May 2010, 07:30 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
They're a tie, hence the problem. ;-)
|
5 May 2010, 07:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
Sods Law!!
Bet they're both in stock, and locally too.......
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
5 May 2010, 08:47 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
I wish! There isn't a good watch shop here. The solo Rolex AD is run by a group of morons, same with Omega. Around here, a Timex is as good as it gets for most people.
|
5 May 2010, 09:22 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
|
Here is mine. Just bought last month and love it..This might help you...Good luck
|
5 May 2010, 11:02 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
vote for the original mako with 12, 6, 9 numerals... i find it more sleek...
|
6 May 2010, 01:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Joji
Location: KY, So. Cal., NJ
Watch: 16800
Posts: 979
|
Mako II has nice updated design however it's quite big.
If you got the wrist go for Mako II otherwise stay with Mako (and get blue). The only con of Mako is that the bezel is hard to turn due to the small grip area and fact that the OD of the bezel is slightly smaller compared to the case. I believe 50% off promo has expired but I'm sure they'll do an another promo soon.
__________________
Rolex Sub 16800 Rolex No Date Sub 114060 Omega Speedmaster Professional Sinn 356 Flieger II, Sinn 556, Sinn ST-140 Marathon SAR, Marathon GSAR |
6 May 2010, 02:36 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
Quote:
Think I'll go with the Blue Mako if my Invicta is truly DOA. Their watch guy was supposed to look yesterday, but who knows how much backlog the guy has. |
|
6 May 2010, 07:09 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
Well, I just got the call. Dead movement, their cost is $78 to fix it. Invicta's cost- $97, not including shipping to get it there!
That Mako's looking pretty good... |
6 May 2010, 11:31 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
saw this while surfing... might help
http://www.thewatchsite.com/index.php?topic=199.0 |
10 May 2010, 01:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
after reading up on both makos, i'm now leaning towards the newer mako.. in almost all reviews, the newer mako is built better than the older mako... hmmmm...
|
10 May 2010, 03:45 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Casey
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Watch: Alpha Milsub
Posts: 704
|
Where did you see that? Everything I have seen (except one outlier) says that the original Mako is basically a tank.
|
10 May 2010, 04:35 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
plus a couple of videos on youtube about the makoI and its bezel (didn't get to take down the link... search Orient Mako and surely a few reviews will pop up)... not dissing any mako, its just that, in my opinion, the Mako II is built "better" than the original Mako -- "improving" on the Mako I |
|
12 June 2010, 08:09 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.