ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 May 2010, 10:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex Explorer 2
Posts: 13
|
Runs Fast
I have noticed when I wear my Explorer 2 on a run, it can be off by as many as 20 seconds later the same day. Without a run, if can vary less than a few seconds a week!
Thoughts? |
5 May 2010, 10:28 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
Stop running
|
5 May 2010, 10:29 AM | #3 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
Ditto
|
5 May 2010, 10:30 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
|
5 May 2010, 10:30 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
What sneakers are you using?!
|
5 May 2010, 10:38 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
|
5 May 2010, 11:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
Time warp??
|
5 May 2010, 01:05 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
|
That's interesting...running shouldn't make a Rolex slower or faster.
|
5 May 2010, 07:37 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
That's what I thought
__________________
Adam |
5 May 2010, 07:48 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
My advice to you would be to stop worrying about tiny variations in accuracy in a mechanical watch.Just wear and enjoy it in good health, if its off by a few seconds, just hack the movement to correct it, if its that important to be spot on.!
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
5 May 2010, 09:06 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Martin
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 462
|
Just run, lets have fun:)
|
5 May 2010, 09:13 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nice, France
Watch: D Sub date 16610
Posts: 929
|
I have no variation whatsoever when I run with my sub.
__________________
Nice is nice |
5 May 2010, 10:02 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
|
5 May 2010, 11:08 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex Explorer 2
Posts: 13
|
Padi56:
I am not worried about "being spot on," as it were. I am more interested in why the variation would result from increased activity. The rotor should wind the watch, yes, but the transfer to power the movement should be the same and constant. I think it curious. I am not looking for advice as much as a possible explanation. Thx. |
6 May 2010, 12:03 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Interesting. I've run with a Rolex on for many years and never noticed a problem.
Actually I can say the same for Panerai and Omega. |
6 May 2010, 12:27 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
6 May 2010, 12:54 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
|
6 May 2010, 01:15 AM | #18 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
However, the timer or regulator is the hairspring balance and escapement........ it oscillates on it's axis at about 300 degrees back and forth (amplitude). If this remains constant, then your tick-tock remains constant.. However, running and swinging your arms, or any other activity, puts an opposite or additional force to the oscillating hairspring (this is simple physics).... Your arm movements will keep the hairspring from fully swinging the complete 300 degrees............ it may shorten the swing to as little as 230 degrees.... this shorter swing happens faster...faster oscillations = faster tick-tock = faster watch.. A worn watch will almost always run slightly faster than a watch that is not worn at all because of your wrists (movements) affect on the amplitude of the hairspring.....
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
6 May 2010, 01:23 AM | #19 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
|
|
6 May 2010, 01:25 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex Explorer 2
Posts: 13
|
Larry:
Thx for the explanation. Would you guess that a 40 minute run would lead to a watch being 20-30 secs fast? I have an Oceanus atomic watch that I set my watches by. It updates once a day around midnight. I just happened to notice the Explorer was right on that morning and wasn't that night... |
6 May 2010, 01:27 AM | #21 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Southern CAL
Watch: Sub TT 116613LN
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
6 May 2010, 01:30 AM | #22 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
6 May 2010, 01:32 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex Explorer 2
Posts: 13
|
Larry:
I really appreciate you insight and expertise! Cheers |
7 May 2010, 04:46 AM | #24 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
|
No, 40 seconds is not a small amount of time and it is not normal. A watch gaining 1-2 seconds from high activity is a acceptable amount of time but 40 seconds not. This is not a acceptable accuracy.
FYI: none of my watches have ever gained more than a second of a full day of activities. ie ( golf, tennis,flyfishing) Quote:
|
|
7 May 2010, 04:54 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Darren
Location: England
Posts: 401
|
Thank you Larry it was just what I was going to say Also I find after a hard day at work I'm too tired to run even walk some days
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.