ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

theken · 2 July 2010, 10:43 PM

I think it is more likely that TRF members that own a GMT2C will buy the SubC and keep their GMT2C.
For most of us, I think the GMT2C with a second time zone is more practical feature than a SubC with a deeper depth rating.
Selling a GMT2C for $5K to buy a $7K+ SubC makes little sense to me as I suspect they will be of comparable value once the SubC is readily available at the ADs and through other sources.

The Waddler · 2 July 2010, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Jones

I agree with JJ the looks are so very close. Bottom line if you need to have the time for up to three time zones GMTII C is your choice. If you are like me and leave the country maybe one time each three to four years the Sub is calling out to you baby.

but don't you already own a GMT?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

2 July 2010, 10:43 PM	#61
theken "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 3,417	I think it is more likely that TRF members that own a GMT2C will buy the SubC and keep their GMT2C. For most of us, I think the GMT2C with a second time zone is more practical feature than a SubC with a deeper depth rating. Selling a GMT2C for $5K to buy a $7K+ SubC makes little sense to me as I suspect they will be of comparable value once the SubC is readily available at the ADs and through other sources.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)