ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 July 2010, 05:28 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: Columbus
Watch: No rolex currently
Posts: 132
|
Can anyone with the new Sub-C post some side by side comparison pics?
I'd really like to see the Sub-C next to the old sub, or even the DSSD. I"m sure we'd ALL love to see it. Just a quick plea for those enjoying this new work of art!
|
17 July 2010, 09:51 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
|
Here you have them all:
DSSD, GMTIIc,old EX I+II,new Subs,old Sub Date,old Sub. Regards Tom |
17 July 2010, 09:58 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
|
Quote:
|
|
17 July 2010, 10:05 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Certainly is, Russ
Tom - absolutely amazing collection!
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
17 July 2010, 10:09 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
|
Yeah, that's a nice collection. Unfortunately, it is not mine...These are watches "unverkäuflich", that means "not for sale", at an AD here in Zurich.
I thought it is an excellent chance for a nice groupshot. But I was so happy with the new Sub (black) that I immediately ordered one and will get it within the next four weeks (hopefully). Regards Tom |
17 July 2010, 10:42 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Destin, FL USA
Watch: Outerspace DayDate
Posts: 2,662
|
Nice group. Wonder where the standard SeaDweller was?
|
18 July 2010, 12:02 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
|
Awesome Tome! Wonderful collection and I don't blame you for not wanting to sell it!
|
18 July 2010, 12:15 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: R.J.
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,546
|
THE case size - especially lug width really is notable on the SUBc
the GMT seems more refined... I'm excited to see the new Sub in the "flesh" but based on Pictures...it is Blocky.. |
18 July 2010, 12:22 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
|
For some reason, the new ceramic subs look a lot morre disporpotionate than the dssd....
|
18 July 2010, 12:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: Columbus
Watch: No rolex currently
Posts: 132
|
Cool
That is a great picture. I was hoping to get a close-up sub-C next to the 16610. It's hard to get a good sense of comparison with so many watches in the picture at different angles and depths. Beautiful though!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.