The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which which do you prefer, both in SS ?
GMT Ceramic 77 44.51%
Submariner Ceramic 96 55.49%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 December 2010, 12:58 AM   #1
clock
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: in a house
Posts: 13,510
GMT C or Sub C?

There are features of both watches that I prefer and am on the fence.

Vote is either GMT C or Sub C.

Thanks.
clock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 12:59 AM   #2
AirKing527
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 256
i would go sub c
AirKing527 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:09 AM   #3
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
tough decision - i would probably go with SS Sub-C

price-wise, you will get a better discount on a SS GMTIIC than a SS Sub-C at the moment
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:12 AM   #4
do or die
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: tatustu
Location: Scotland
Watch: SubC ExpII
Posts: 95
subc , i dont like the polished centre links on the GMT. Plus the sub has the new glidelock clasp.
do or die is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:14 AM   #5
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
Seems like quite a few are perplexed by this dilemma.

For me, it's an easy choice: Sub-C....Not a fan of the GMT-C's bezel font, PCLs or green text and hand.

Good luck!
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:17 AM   #6
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Ha! I'll be the lone voice in the wilderness. GMT for me. Both are amazing pieces, but the GMT has always had a special place for me.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:25 AM   #7
TRW
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tim
Location: tennessee
Watch: 16623 YM
Posts: 3,630
Having been around here for a little while now,I have takin a liking to the SS Sport Models.I really Like the Rolex Divers Lineup.
TRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 01:57 AM   #8
thesmallwave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Levi
Location: Romania & England
Watch: Sub C Black
Posts: 568
Sub C, becouse can go deeper 300 M vs 100 M GMT...hehe
thesmallwave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 02:37 AM   #9
axecollector65
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Watch: Casio G-Shock
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesmallwave View Post
Sub C, becouse can go deeper 300 M vs 100 M GMT...hehe
come on......don't tell me that's your reason. I think most of us here choose models based on looks, popularity and value, but to tell me that cause it can go 200M deeper. I find that hard to believe.
axecollector65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 02:48 AM   #10
TopNotchChach
"TRF" Member
 
TopNotchChach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,306
both are very nice. but a little biased and picked the sub c because thats what im wearing right now.
TopNotchChach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 02:49 AM   #11
Trailblazer
"TRF" Member
 
Trailblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
SubC for me, I am a simple guy
Trailblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 02:53 AM   #12
thesmallwave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Levi
Location: Romania & England
Watch: Sub C Black
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally Posted by axecollector65 View Post
come on......don't tell me that's your reason. I think most of us here choose models based on looks, popularity and value, but to tell me that cause it can go 200M deeper. I find that hard to believe.
Then you have it:
Sub C for the looks, popularity and resale value, not only that but it does look cleaner to me then GMT.
thesmallwave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:02 AM   #13
Chipmunk
"TRF" Member
 
Chipmunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
That's easy.......GMTIIC.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

Chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:03 AM   #14
TheCanadian
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: GMTIIc, TTDJ2
Posts: 186
GMT bc I love the mix between sport and flashy
TheCanadian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:11 AM   #15
NMS75
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
Tough call but I voted GMT-Master II. The new Submariner ceramic is a fantastic looking watch but its predecessor (the 16610) has the edge for me. The GMTIIc, however, looks great with the ceramic bezel.

Just my opinion...

M
NMS75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:13 AM   #16
watchyou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
GMT-C,because that's what I have.
watchyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:22 AM   #17
Sixxgrand1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: EXP I & II
Posts: 825
I do not own either but have seen and held both in the flesh...my own opinions...
- font too large on the GMT bezel making for a busy crowded dial where the Sub bezel is less so.
- polished links vs. preferred brushed links on the Sub.
- green GMT hand - wish it was red.
- GMT bezel can appear rather grayish vs. the Sub's deep black bezel which looks sharp in any light.
Sixxgrand1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:41 AM   #18
thesmallwave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Levi
Location: Romania & England
Watch: Sub C Black
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixxgrand1 View Post
I do not own either but have seen and held both in the flesh...my own opinions...
- font too large on the GMT bezel making for a busy crowded dial where the Sub bezel is less so.
- polished links vs. preferred brushed links on the Sub.
- green GMT hand - wish it was red.
- GMT bezel can appear rather grayish vs. the Sub's deep black bezel which looks sharp in any light.
You've said it very well.
thesmallwave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:51 AM   #19
cafejenna
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Watch: Love all.
Posts: 119
I vote GMTIIc because it is what I have :) But that being said, I really think the GMT is the best sport rolex. The 24 hour hand, the numbers on the bezel, the clasp, the polished center links, just make it all around fashion and rugged at the same time. The Sub C is gorgeous, as I tried it on, but I feel the GMT will stay with me longer, and I do travel, so the 24 hour hand is cool. I used to have the older submariner and the older GMT pepsi, and the GMT just did it for me. Plus, in my travels, I have seen much more subs that GMTs. Bottom line though, as I am sure anyone on this forum will agree: both are pretty much A+ watches and you really can't go wrong. I would like a Sub C someday too.
cafejenna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 03:55 AM   #20
Roley
"TRF" Member
 
Roley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Roland
Location: GMT -4:00 Today
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 874
GMT...Great for travel.
Roley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 04:33 AM   #21
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesmallwave View Post
Then you have it:
Sub C for the looks, popularity and resale value, not only that but it does look cleaner to me then GMT.
And the amazing glidelock clasp!!!
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 05:01 AM   #22
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
GMT for me as well.
Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 05:19 AM   #23
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
My vote is for the GMT...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 05:50 AM   #24
qulhey22
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Toby
Location: Thibodaux LA
Watch: GMT II c 11/2010
Posts: 35
GMTIIc for me. I need a dressier a watch.

Both are beautiful.
qulhey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 06:32 AM   #25
Scott L.
"TRF" Member
 
Scott L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 4
Icon7

Quote:
Originally Posted by thesmallwave View Post
Sub C, becouse can go deeper 300 M vs 100 M GMT...hehe
I agree!
Scott L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 07:09 AM   #26
manandjoe
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 36
sub c is great.

But the GMT IIC kicks it up a notch with the PCL. The reality both are so similar to each other.

Go with your first choice..
manandjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 11:05 AM   #27
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Tough choice, but if only one then the Sub
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 11:16 AM   #28
Latrodectus
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Latrodectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 10,043
I voted for the GMT...
__________________

Member # 16057
4-Hands Club
Tosser Club Member
TRF Skypers Group
Latrodectus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 11:16 AM   #29
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
The GMT will do more for you in everyday life.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2010, 11:19 AM   #30
tictocChuck
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Seattle
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 256
I have both, but depending on my mood I'll wear one or the other. The SS GMT IIc is a little more dressy with the polished center links and understated green 24 hour hand. The SS Sub c is perhaps suited to those who are more traditional and prefer the Rolex "tool watch" look of yesteryear with no polished links. I like having both, but if I could only have one, it certainly would be a tough choice. Good Luck and let your wrist do the talking.
tictocChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.