|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 December 2010, 02:26 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,419
|
which one?
Hello guys,iwould like to purchase my first Pam but i can't decide myself about which one is good form me: Luminor 000 or Radiomir 210?
 Can you help me? Which is better? Thank you all. |
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 02:31 AM
|
#2 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
I went with the 000. Just something about it I can not explain. Maybe it's to Luminor case, Panerai crown protector or the simple dial with a Panerai logo. On the other hand, 210 is a sexy looking thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 02:38 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
You can't go wrong with those two! (-;
__________________
member#3242 |
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 03:05 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
They're both great, however my personal feeling is that Luminor screams Panerai.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 03:14 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 77
|
Like many said before, they´re both great watches. The Luminor is what many think of when they think of Panerai, and is also a more "rough" watch.
I´ve had the 210 and its great! With the OEM black leather-strap it is perfect for suit, and with a golden hornback it goes with everything (except a suit, maybe  )I find the Luminor so much better looking with the 1950-case. I never had the 000, but I had the 164 (same case) and I sold it to get a 1950 Luminor. Anyway, you´re in for a great watch! 
|
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 04:16 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,338
|
Apples to apples I prefer the look of the Luminor, though I think the Radiomir is more comfortable.
__________________
I'm a perpetual kind of guy   Resident Audemars Piguet Fanatic |
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 05:56 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
111 or 005 over 000.210 or 113 as a second PAM
|
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 11:36 AM
|
#8 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 11:59 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Only perfect answer is to eventually get both! Seriously no wrong choice here.
The 210 will sit much lower and although it is "larger" in diameter, it actually wears smaller than its 44mm counterpart. 
__________________
member#3242 |
|
|
|
|
30 December 2010, 01:16 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
Luminor 000!!!
if you get the 000 welcome to the club
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
