ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 May 2011, 07:05 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
16800 39mm case?
Was browsing some website a while back and saw that 16800 Subs had 39mm cases as opposed to 40mm 16610. Can anyone confirm this to be true? What is the weight difference between these two?
|
8 May 2011, 07:21 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I can tell no difference between either of my 16800s and my 16610LV. It is essentially the same watch.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
8 May 2011, 07:44 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
what about difference between 14060 and 16610, anyone?
|
8 May 2011, 07:48 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cheshire
Watch: DJ 116234 Roman N
Posts: 197
|
|
8 May 2011, 07:57 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
|
8 May 2011, 07:57 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Now I can tell you that the 14060M is slightly smaller then the 16610. Their bezel inserts are not interchangeable.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
8 May 2011, 08:00 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
Jason thanks! Does anyone have a side by side pic of 14060 and 16610?
|
8 May 2011, 08:15 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
8 May 2011, 09:23 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
thanks, i like the maxi dial and hands on the LV
|
8 May 2011, 09:52 AM | #10 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
The 14060 and the 16610 are completely different watches.... very little interchanges with the 14060 being slightly smaller overall..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
8 May 2011, 09:55 AM | #11 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
the short interim 168000 was the switch to 904L, but since the 3135 was not quite ready, they simply stamped an extra zero onto the 16800 - it became a 904L case (identical to the 16610) with the early 3035 movement.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member Last edited by Tools; 9 May 2011 at 02:52 AM.. |
|
8 May 2011, 10:46 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
|
thanks Larry
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.