The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 10 July 2007, 07:01 AM   #1
Luminor
"TRF" Member
 
Luminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Claude
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Deepsea Sea-
Posts: 391
SS/Plat Yachtmaster

Is the bracelet on the 1662 made of stainless-steel only?

Thanks guys

Btw here's another pic of my watch :)
Attached Images
 
Luminor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:02 AM   #2
Rubenonfire
"TRF" Member
 
Rubenonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
Only platinum on the Yammie is the bezel, I believe.
Rubenonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:04 AM   #3
USMCsilver
"TRF" Member
 
USMCsilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Sterling
Location: Middle of SC
Watch: Anniv. GMT II
Posts: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubenonfire View Post
Only platinum on the Yammie is the bezel, I believe.
The dial is stamped from platinum, as well.
USMCsilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:08 AM   #4
Luminor
"TRF" Member
 
Luminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Claude
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Deepsea Sea-
Posts: 391
If you ask me then, the 16622 is very-over priced, it's basically a SS watch with some platinum shavings running about. I'd rather buy a SS Daytona for the money
Luminor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:22 AM   #5
D4UK
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Watch: TT SUB LV GMTII
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by claud3 View Post
If you ask me then, the 16622 is very-over priced, it's basically a SS watch with some platinum shavings running about. I'd rather buy a SS Daytona for the money
trouble is you won't easily find a SS Daytona at list and the SS?YM can be had with a reasonable discount...

I agree it's a quite a pricey model.. but I love mine.
D4UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:58 AM   #6
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by claud3 View Post
If you ask me then, the 16622 is very-over priced, it's basically a SS watch with some platinum shavings running about. I'd rather buy a SS Daytona for the money

Platinum shavings running about! lol Must remember to use that when my son visits & then duck for cover,

Out of interest how many shavings are in other PL model such as the PL DD?
Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 10:38 AM   #7
supermarz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 322
yeah...for platinum bezel and dial i do think they are a lil expensive in comparison to other sport models... but i still love mine very much

this website here have a bit of information regarding the platinum in ym http://www.watchwallpapers.com/plat.htm
Attached Images
 
supermarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 12:59 PM   #8
MMRolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DC metro
Posts: 45
Thank you for the link. I appreciate my YM that much more.
MMRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 01:04 PM   #9
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
certainly more then shavings.....the bezel and dial are solid platinum (950)
__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 05:13 PM   #10
Luminor
"TRF" Member
 
Luminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Claude
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Deepsea Sea-
Posts: 391
you have to consider that, it is priced as much/more than other tt models. And the return for material you get on this model is unjustifiable. I love looking at it, i was seriously considering it as my next rolex. But when i found out the bracelet is made of steel my plans flew out of the window
Luminor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 05:23 PM   #11
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
well of cos one can do a comparison....

16622
solid platinum dial
solid platinum bezel
all solid ss bracelet
ss crown

16623
brass (?) dial
solid yg gold bezel
hollow middle gold links
ss crown

so what are we paying for?.....both are poor returns for raw materials used.....haha

just buy what u like....
__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 05:51 PM   #12
Luminor
"TRF" Member
 
Luminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Claude
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Deepsea Sea-
Posts: 391
the 16613 has a better return since it is less expensive than the yachtmaster.

The 16622 is really not worth the money, i'd rather go all SS
Luminor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 06:49 PM   #13
ROGU808
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 288
Isn't the PL DD a solid platinum watch?
I tried on the solid PL Master DD...weighs a ton!
Gotta love the way that weight makes you feel.
One thing I do love about platinum is that it's much denser than gold or steel.
Won't chip or flake away any material if you happen to bang it. Just working that working platinum is more difficult...and along with the raw material being more rare...the price is substancially higher.
ROGU808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:33 PM   #14
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROGU808 View Post
Isn't the PL DD a solid platinum watch?
I tried on the solid PL Master DD...weighs a ton!
oh we are talking about the ym......and the dd is a solid platinum watch....
__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 07:36 PM   #15
ohlins
"TRF" Member
 
ohlins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by claud3 View Post
the 16613 has a better return since it is less expensive than the yachtmaster.

The 16622 is really not worth the money, i'd rather go all SS
i dunno what u mean by returns on money....so just buy what u like cos it's your money afterall......
__________________

the hype is true. a crown for every achievement.
visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link?
ohlins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2007, 10:29 PM   #16
supermarz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 322
the cheapest way to buy a rolex is by far all the ss one..... as soon as you go TT or platinum bezel and dial like ym or even solid gold or solid platinum, prices soar to the top ..... many times the SS models.
having said that, the movements in these solid gold platinum models are more or less the same as the SS ones.

so if you want the best bang for your buck then definitely the all SS models are the way to go.

if you are going to weigh up the cost with how much gold / platinum on rolex watches, you will never be able to justify the extra price.

and im guessing probably most people who are looking for watches with precious metal on them don't really care too much about how much weight of plat/gold on their watches....if they like it...they probably going to get it

i can only imagine going to rolex and ask " how many grams of gold / plat on this day date?"

anyway..... enuff rambling for me ....

happy contemplating claud3....and please show us a wrist shot when you have it
supermarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2007, 01:48 AM   #17
Ronnie Rolex
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Man. Bch., CA USA
Watch: SS-P YM
Posts: 679
I agree with Supermarz. Going with precious metals in a Rolex will never justify the price difference between SS. $500 of gold doesn't justify a $2,500 markup does it?

Then again, does $300 (or less) worth of raw materials in a SS watch justify a $5,500 price tag? Perhaps not. But this isn't why we buy Rolexes right?
Ronnie Rolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.