ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 July 2007, 07:00 PM | #31 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
I have always been surprised at the number of genuine Rolex watches that are offered for sale without papers.
Now that I am learning more about Rolex I see that the number (or serial letter and number) on the watch dates the watch within a certain time span and that this can be quite a long time span. I think we might now see Rolex simply mark the watch with a s/n but it will be the date of sale that dates the watch. This will mean that the plastic card (with purchaser, model number, s/n and date of sale) will now become very important and 'date' the watch exactly with the s/n on the card confirming the watch's ID. The card must now accompany the watch or Rolex would need to certify the authenticity via their records.
__________________
E |
9 July 2007, 10:37 PM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
B G H I J M O Q V.
I can see why O wasn't used, too easy to mix with 0, maybe the same for Q, and "I" could be mistaken for 1. For all we know, Rolex could continue their alpha-numeric serials using double letters to prefix them. I know a couple of girls who'd fit perfectly wearing the DDxxx serial #.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
9 July 2007, 10:42 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Conversely, some serial #'s were used for a very short time span. E, X and N serial #'s could all be 1991. Makes me wonder why they did that.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
9 July 2007, 11:04 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
The Z appears to have the most defects per capita, it may becoming avoided like the plague instead!
__________________
|
10 July 2007, 03:11 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!
|
10 July 2007, 04:11 AM | #36 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
10 July 2007, 08:03 AM | #37 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: East Anglia
Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI
Posts: 923
|
Got two that work like a treat..........
Does anyone have any hard evidence to say if one year would be more or less reliable than any other ? I think it unlikely that the Swiss would suddenly start turning out shoddy watches But I am really new at this |
10 July 2007, 10:33 AM | #38 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Peter,
We're just bashing Z's because they are the latest, and currently the most sought after, serial run. D's were before them; but I hope in most cases it is harmless fun. Just haveing watched the forums on Rolex the past few years, photography is getting more detailed, and the use a 10X loupe seems to be the latest investigation tool for the watch officianado. Internally they are largely unchanged and very robust. A few years ago this nit-picking of every visible aspect of a watch was unheard of. My guess is there is no data base (outside Rolex corporate) for which series may have more returns for defects than others. Watchmakers have their own opinions of how the new ones compare with older models, but I would let them chime in rather than speculate. |
11 July 2007, 06:51 AM | #39 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: East Anglia
Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI
Posts: 923
|
Quote:
It is amazing when you think of it that we can see pictures of watches from Singapore,Las Vegas and Australia within 30 minutes of the buyer walking out of the AD. Technology is going far faster than I can keep up with |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.