ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2011, 12:32 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 5,524
|
The Sea Dweller is really an amazing watch
I have two in my inventory right now, a Z and a M, and today I was bored and was checking them out; it has been a while since I sat down and really examined these beauties since owning and flipping one a year ago. This is really a watch I would like to own for myself permanently soon. The weight is perfect, the size is perfect, everything about it is just so perfect. It just has that slight heft compared to the 16610 Sub, and it's just so so so perfect. Sorry for the rant!
|
7 August 2011, 12:38 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
AGREED!!! SD is one of the best of all time.
|
7 August 2011, 12:40 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
Could not agree more, I love the weight of the SD, perfection is the right word IMHO It was also my first Rolex back in 2001 and I have owned a few since, my latest a NIB M I just grabbed will not leave me
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
7 August 2011, 12:43 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
|
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.. I still remember not too long ago, ppl were complaining that the SD is too thick and too heavy.. I too love my SD (but mine is on steroid aka the DSSD ) .. .. James
|
7 August 2011, 12:54 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
The 16600 is my favorite Rolex of all that I've owned.
The 16600 is like looking down on a 14060M with the benefit of a date, SEL bracelet and a beefy profile with the best darn bezel surround I've ever seen. It is a work of art. I got over the modern, blingy ceramic on the Sub-C quickly and quite honestly prefer the look of the anodized classic. The SD has a fat font like vintage Rolex. The case is classic and looks amazing. I also don't miss that GINORMOUS clasp from the Sub-C. While there is a lot to like about the glide lock adjustability, I get what I need from the classic clasp. I wish I could move one more link away from the 6:00 side, but I've grown accustomed to the fit. Overall, the 16600 is simply a classic, understated Rolex dive watch. |
7 August 2011, 01:01 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 176
|
probably the best rolex ever made
|
7 August 2011, 01:08 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,074
|
My favorite SS Rolex diving watch. Go Big!
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
7 August 2011, 01:10 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
|
7 August 2011, 01:18 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: USA
Posts: 959
|
+1....the SD is my favorite in the collection.
|
7 August 2011, 01:21 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Plankton
Location: US
Watch: less
Posts: 4,161
|
The SD is a real beauty!
|
7 August 2011, 01:25 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 63
|
Definitely my favorite watch.
|
7 August 2011, 01:39 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
It's one I don't have, maybe some day.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
7 August 2011, 01:42 PM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
Luv my SD too. Congrats to all SD owners 8).
|
7 August 2011, 01:45 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
7 August 2011, 02:00 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
I love the SD too. I'm really torn between the SD and the SubC as my next Rolex but currently I'm leaning towards the SD.
__________________
116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986 |
7 August 2011, 02:10 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: LA
Watch: Rolex 16610,Piaget
Posts: 14
|
Seriously considering selling my 16610 Sub and upgrading to one of these soon.
|
7 August 2011, 02:18 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 9
|
After 9 years, my sd finally gave out on me. $635 later, it returned from service last week, and it looks like it came brand new out of the store yesterday! Definitely money well spent, especially on a classic watch like this one. I'm hoping I'm good for another 9 years!
|
7 August 2011, 04:17 PM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2011, 04:20 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
__________________
116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986 |
7 August 2011, 04:23 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
That's why I offered to loan you mine for a trial run. I've always considered the SD to be THE Rolex dial watch. Fr. John† |
|
7 August 2011, 04:24 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Anyone have pics comparing to a DJ for size reference?
Thanks! |
7 August 2011, 05:09 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Jet
Location: SoCal, USA
Watch: SD/Sub/GMT/Daytona
Posts: 796
|
Agreed! I have an M I acquired in 2009. However, it is currently a safe queen and my Sub date is my daily wear watch.
|
7 August 2011, 10:15 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
The SD's definitely my favorite watch. I've had 2 M's but was lucky to find the last batch in the production - a bnib V serial! This is definitely a keeper!
|
7 August 2011, 10:23 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
|
Yes, here it is smiling and winking at me!
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP |
7 August 2011, 10:59 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 413
|
agee, SD is my favourite watch in my collection
|
7 August 2011, 11:04 PM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Tramp
Posts: 2,369
|
Well Said! I love my SD
Quote:
|
|
7 August 2011, 11:19 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
I would so never sell mine..
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
7 August 2011, 11:24 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Aahhh the Sea Dweller, be it the 16600 or the 1665 a fabulous watch...
|
8 August 2011, 12:39 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 9
|
Unfortunately I'm kicking myself for not taking before pics. It was in good shape for a 9 year old watch. I'd take after pics, but my camera is at the office and I won't be back for a few days. Just look at some pics of a new one, and that's pretty much mine :-) :-) :-)
It was tough spending so much on the service, but after I got it back it seemed like very little considering how amazing it looked! |
8 August 2011, 12:42 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,534
|
I have never tried a Sea Dweller on to see how much larger it feels than the sub. Have the DSSD but that is no comparison on thickness. I love the SD but never enough to take the plunge.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.