ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 August 2011, 12:19 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
I don't get this comment at all.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
28 August 2011, 12:25 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,306
|
very nice. too small for my wrist.
i would go with either 1 or 2. not three. |
28 August 2011, 01:18 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Not a fan of the bark. Since no. 1 and no. 2 are almost similar with prices that are very close I would choose the one in the best condition (bracelet, polish, crystal etc.) and the latest year.
|
28 August 2011, 01:37 PM | #64 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
Quote:
When I bought my 1991 DD I had the choice of a 2000 model from the same seller for about the same price. Both had white roman dials but the 'N' romans were 'finer' and looked better. Between the three you picture I would choose No 1.
__________________
E |
|
28 August 2011, 03:04 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Gym Rat
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,327
|
My opinions/considerations:
What's the service history? Is warranty offered? Do all these have the same number of links (24)? Box and papers for any of them? If these were on eBay what's the feedback track record? My choice if all the above does not present a frontrunner is #2 or 3 for price and my style I like bark |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.