ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 August 2007, 02:35 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: Japan
Watch: All of them
Posts: 304
|
Cruious to know if an authentication paper instead of the Rolex Guarantee with serial number would be worth anything as far as "genuine papers" are concerned when it came to selling a watch?
If not, then, is the authentication only for one's own peace of mind? |
6 August 2007, 03:16 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,213
|
i think it's the next best thing if the original warranty cert is lost.....
__________________
the hype is true. a crown for every achievement. visit my audio and watch blog & how to use the rolex comfort link? |
6 August 2007, 03:43 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
Quote:
I for one could read all day about this sorta things. |
|
6 August 2007, 04:27 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
I don't know how RSCs in other parts of the world operate, but in the U.S. RSCs do not issue authentication papers. What you will get is a service estimate which indicates your watch is real as Rolex won't work on anything else. Should you refuse the service you may be charged a fee ( I thought this was 60 or 70 dollars but I'm not sure). In any event you will have some assurance the piece is genuine. As sheldon indicated if you walk in you may not even get that. |
|
6 August 2007, 04:33 AM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
|
|
6 August 2007, 04:35 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
|
6 August 2007, 04:37 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
6 August 2007, 04:40 AM | #38 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: maverick
Location: Prescott
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
They are too afraid of messing up a dial which they cannot replace. =) maverick BTW, they might be more accommodating with other models. |
|
6 August 2007, 04:46 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
6 August 2007, 05:19 AM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Yep.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
6 August 2007, 05:39 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
Here's an example of two authentic 1680s. One has it's original tritium dial and hands, While this one has a service replacement luminova dial and hands, Both watches carry full RSC service paperwork, but to a collector the orginal trit. dial is worth much more. While many take a contemporary watch to an AD or trained watchmaker for "verification" it's important to remember not all ADs are well versed in vintage pieces.--That is NOT a derogatory comment on ADs!!-- simply their thrust is in the selling and dealing with modern watches. Buying vintage is a bit more involved. Time and research are necessary tools in the understanding of the variations of vintage pieces. Stories abound on the net of buyers taking vintage pieces here and there for verification and after being told their watches were "real" find out later that yes the watch has all Rolex parts, but the wrong parts for the period. If I recall this happened to a member of this forum a while back. I believe he bought what was thought to be a RED 1680 only to find out the dial was a real Rolex dial but did not belong in the watch due to the serial number being to high. Dial and parts swapping sadly is a fact we in the vintage community must be on guard for. When "on the hunt" I try to do as much research as I possibly can on the targeted reference. Here is where the collective wisdom of the experts in the vintage arena is IMHO more valuable than an AD telling me I have a real movement. Here's another small example. Look closely at the white 1680s in this photo, Both are my watches. I purchased the one on the left knowing there was a slight issue, but one easily fixed. (And since has been through an RSC service) Hint: Look closely at the bezel insert pearl. Yep! it's got a metal ring! Incorrect for the 1680 (and for that matter any diver before the debut of the reference 16800). Easily fixed, but not correct for the reference though everything else was perfect on the watch, and to be fair the seller,a fine gentleman, told me as much--full discolsure. I certainly don't mean to scare off anyone from the wonderfull satisfaction a fine vintage piece brings, in fact understanding and owning a fine vintage piece IMO gives one a wonderfull understanding of the great history Rolex has. |
|
6 August 2007, 05:48 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
This is what I am talking about
So many replacements which are not epoque. Think I have an Omega movements explanation like this somewhere, I will look for it, get back to ye soon. Thx |
6 August 2007, 08:06 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Filip
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,619
|
Because the online file is a pdf and some people maybe cannot open it, I converted it to smaller size jpegs.
If anybody want the original in better quality ... http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec/Colourvariations.pdf For the website (more information on for instance recognizing repainted dials) ... http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/ Examples are Omega Constellations. Hope somebody can do something with it. |
6 August 2007, 08:33 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Wonderfull information Filip!!
Indeed the information on refinished dials is fantastic! Thanks for posting such a great resource! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.