The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 September 2011, 10:58 AM   #61
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by daunwaun View Post
What?

so are there for CEOS?
Sorry, no, they have two CEOs. My mungling of the language.

They did, however, have THREE Chief Operating Officers, and it appears they are now down to two:

http://www.rim.com/newsroom/mediaexecutive/index.shtml

These are the type of things that cause anyone experienced to shake their head sadly.
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 September 2011, 02:12 PM   #62
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I have one on order. I got a Verizon Torch (no keyboard) Friday and was done with it by 2pm Saturday. I also need a real keyboard. As an IT Director my email is my life. I do take a lot of pics, so the camera needs to be excellent. Apps and web browsing aren't important. I don't want to be that "into" a phone.

I agree that RIM is in serious trouble. I just want one more BB before I am forced to go Droid or (gulp) some other company. Who knows. The smartest thing RIM could do is begin supporting Activesync like droid and iphone.

Wearing my IT hat, I think the BB method of doing email is nearly dead. We are moving to the "everyone already has a smartphone" model where we support what you bring. Overwhelmingly the choice is droid or iphone. BES Express eliminates the need to buy client licenses for Blackberry, so we keep that around. If we were still buying licenses it would probably be history.

I don't know what's on the horizon, but I wish someone would come along and replace BB with a non-droid activesync touchscreen phone with a keyboard. I was a Treo guy from the beginning and hated to see it go. The Palm Pre was pretty cool, but not quite there.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2011, 11:08 AM   #63
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
RIMM's earnings news today was horrible, as expected. Units down, sales down, gross profit down, net income down.

Stock is being hammered overnight.

The two co-CEOs offered assurance that they'll discount the current models enough to keep loyal users, and the new QNX OS models will be a huge hit in time to save the year.

Riiiiight.
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 September 2011, 11:23 AM   #64
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Good news!

I'll be due for a new phone in June 2012, so I'll be getting one of the QNX phones.

I'm not too hyped up about it, because my 9650 does plenty enough to keep me happy most of the time and actually, the browser has been working just fine for the sites I visit most.

I have a buddy who has an iPhone and every time we get together, he spends the whole time shoving it in my face trying to impress me.

I must admit that it does a lot of things, but basically, it does very little that interests me.

The bottom line is that I don't want a $100+ phone bill every month and any iPhone or Android is a one way ticket to enormous phone bills.

That's why they were invented.

For about $70 a month, I've got plenty of phone.

In a typical month I use well under 200 minutes, send just over 250 texts and use less that 50MB of data.

I'm always interested in new tech, but I'm not much interested in a device that is basically a pipeline to my wallet.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 03:58 AM   #65
ag62000
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 81
nice!!!!!!
ag62000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 04:42 AM   #66
TopNotchChach
"TRF" Member
 
TopNotchChach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Near the Ocean!
Watch: 116610
Posts: 1,306
does the web browser still suck?
TopNotchChach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 05:44 AM   #67
jamesbondOO7
"TRF" Member
 
jamesbondOO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,081
No idea, almost never use it.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛
jamesbondOO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 12:03 PM   #68
mboverst
"TRF" Member
 
mboverst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
Wow, just now saw this thread again after it was bumped up and the comments after my last post. Obviously RIM was overpriced at $130 and has settled where it should be based off the volume of business and profitability it has and will continue to have (very arguably undervalued).

Compare RIM to lets say BofA who is obviously depressed in this market with 10000x the assets, PPI, etc in this unstable market trading at ~7. Yeah, I back my statement that RIM is doing just fine. Just because a company is not at its high during, for all practical purposes, a near second recession doesn't mean it's anywhere near closing its doors or even in bad shape.
mboverst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 12:28 PM   #69
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by mboverst View Post
Wow, just now saw this thread again after it was bumped up and the comments after my last post. Obviously RIM was overpriced at $130 and has settled where it should be based off the volume of business and profitability it has and will continue to have (very arguably undervalued).

Compare RIM to lets say BofA who is obviously depressed in this market with 10000x the assets, PPI, etc in this unstable market trading at ~7. Yeah, I back my statement that RIM is doing just fine. Just because a company is not at its high during, for all practical purposes, a near second recession doesn't mean it's anywhere near closing its doors or even in bad shape.
They released Q2 earnings on Thursday. Worth a read.
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 12:33 PM   #70
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
Sorry, no, they have two CEOs. My mungling of the language.

They did, however, have THREE Chief Operating Officers, and it appears they are now down to two:

http://www.rim.com/newsroom/mediaexecutive/index.shtml

These are the type of things that cause anyone experienced to shake their head sadly.
I just figured out their whole problem. Both CEO's and the CTO are local hosers who have been with the company since the stone age, the CFO is your typical ex-E&Y suit. These guys are sealed away in their little Canadian version of Bentonville, surrounded by their hoser friends and suppliers.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 12:35 PM   #71
mboverst
"TRF" Member
 
mboverst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
They released Q2 earnings on Thursday. Worth a read.
Was on top of it, it's what I do...after that news still trading at $25 and doesn't change my thoughts on them.
mboverst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 11:16 PM   #72
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Rooney View Post
I just figured out their whole problem. Both CEO's and the CTO are local hosers who have been with the company since the stone age, the CFO is your typical ex-E&Y suit. These guys are sealed away in their little Canadian version of Bentonville, surrounded by their hoser friends and suppliers.
Yep, Novell squandered their lead in a similar fashion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mboverst View Post
Was on top of it, it's what I do...after that news still trading at $25 and doesn't change my thoughts on them.
Absolutely astounding... well, if you liked it at $140 before the wheels came off, and at $80 a year ago, and at $24 now, imagine the love in a month!
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 September 2011, 11:39 PM   #73
mboverst
"TRF" Member
 
mboverst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
Absolutely astounding... well, if you liked it at $140 before the wheels came off, and at $80 a year ago, and at $24 now, imagine the love in a month!
I didn't say I liked it ever, I just said it's nowhere near going the way of the dinosaur as previously stated.

I don't know why it's crazy to believe someone liked it at all those trading levels?

I liked LVS at $140 (same time RIMM topped out) with the Macau growth, I liked it when it was at $2, and I like it now at $50. Same holds true for my BAC reference earlier...it's trading at a fraction of it's high, is it astounding to believe that it's still a good buy or is this just another 'the wheels coming off' scenario with no end in sight?
mboverst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 September 2011, 03:54 AM   #74
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by mboverst View Post
I didn't say I liked it ever, I just said it's nowhere near going the way of the dinosaur as previously stated.

I don't know why it's crazy to believe someone liked it at all those trading levels?

I liked LVS at $140 (same time RIMM topped out) with the Macau growth, I liked it when it was at $2, and I like it now at $50. Same holds true for my BAC reference earlier...it's trading at a fraction of it's high, is it astounding to believe that it's still a good buy or is this just another 'the wheels coming off' scenario with no end in sight?
(I am not qualified to type the following so no one should invest based on this)

BAC is pretty opaque to me. If I knew they had the guts to file for bankruptcy on Countrywide, I'd be all over it. No idea if they do or not.

BAC's business model, products, etc. remain viable, so the price reflects the markets distaste for banks plus the undigested toxic assets. BAC and RIMM would be similar if all phone manufacturer stocks were tanking. If JPM and C were at all-time highs with BAC in single digits, we'd know BAC was judged uniquely low value by the market.

Some comments today on RIM from here

“Management doesn’t see reality the way the market sees it right now,”

“RIM is underestimating the increasingly competitive smartphone environment,”

“We worry the refreshed RIM products will not change consumer sentiment or regain lost customers.”

"The company is showing no progress in the tablet computer market. "

“We don’t trust those numbers,”

"We do not anticipate BB7 being competitive once those new versions of all those operating systems are in the market over the next few weeks.”
I'm not finding anyone who has confidence in either of the two co-CEOs, and I see RIM as depressed in a thriving sector unlike BAC, depressed in a depressed sector.

But again... I'm not even an amateur stock picker, so who knows.
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.