ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 October 2012, 01:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
Rolex GMT 1675 ???????
Hey, need some help, if what you think about this 1675-0 It should be from 1959/60 132XXX Movement no. D.9377 These are pictures, also information from the auction ... Thank you.
Regards Paradis
__________________
|
23 October 2012, 02:19 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
Serial number 132xxx would be around 1941. If you missed a digit (which I believe you did) should be from around 1955-1956, the GMT Master was launched in 1954 but as ref. 6542 with no crown guards and gilt dial. The 1675 was launched until 1960 with pointed crown guards (cornino). You could be looking at a 'frankenwatch'. The hands are not correct for the time period of for a gilt dial GMT. The bezel is not correct either for the time period you state. A GMT from the time period you mention (based on the serial number) should come with a bakelite bezel insert and a brass bezel setup, no crown guards, gilt dial, gilt hands and small GMT red hand.
If it's from 1959 it cannot be a 1675 or a 16750. The 16750 is a quick-set from the early 80's.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
23 October 2012, 02:40 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
You are missing the information from the auction. Can you re-copy?
Also, 1.3 mil should be around 1965. |
23 October 2012, 02:55 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
Yes, I missed, serial 132XXXX movement D.93757 rolex GMT 1675-0 Information is from Tradera Swedish auction site.
__________________
|
23 October 2012, 03:29 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Careful not to confuse the 1675-0 with the 16750. The "-0" denotes stainless steel
Sent from my using Tapatalk
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
23 October 2012, 03:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
Looks a bit like a bit of this and a bit of that has been used to put this watch together. Regular services can often account for a disparity of pieces in a watch that is 40+ years old but in this case the hands are a bit of a give away, when hands are replaced at service they don't leave a badly discolored, probably relumed second hand in place while replacing the others, that and the fact that GMT hand just happened to be hidden behind the cyclops would urge me to proceed with care. The dial, case and bezel look OK but the insert hands and date wheel don't look original to this watch.
If you have the time and patience this could be an interesting project watch, but not if the price goes much higher. Good luck! |
23 October 2012, 03:47 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Mario
Location: USA / NZ
Watch: All sorts
Posts: 799
|
I wouldn't, Mate.
Too many things fishy and wonder how worn out the Jubilee is as well?? Keep looking. |
23 October 2012, 04:06 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
36 bids, 5days left .... price is now around 4000 usd .......... Thanks for the help, I decline.
__________________
|
23 October 2012, 04:14 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
Check out Jacek, he's alway got a few nice 1675 on offer...
|
23 October 2012, 04:34 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
|
23 October 2012, 05:07 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
My next watch will be 5513 gilt dial, but the owner of the watch 1675-0 said , look at it ...... why I wanted to check with you first. It would have been ok, maybe I had changed my mind. Now it is not so, but thanks for all the help.
__________________
|
23 October 2012, 07:25 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
Good move
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.