The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 April 2013, 10:02 PM   #1
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Who here does not own a GMT IIc?

I really missed my Explorer I 39mm

Looking at my Rolex, thinking if the GMT IIc should go since it has the least wrist time.

What are the thoughts here? thanks..
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 10:04 PM   #2
Rocco22
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
I don't have one and never have.dont get me wrong it is a beautiful watch but I generally like watches with less complications.i like simple things.if you are contemplating getting rid of it then go with your gut.
Rocco22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 10:19 PM   #3
SWISSAHOLICS
"TRF" Member
 
SWISSAHOLICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
I owned a TT GMT IIc but ended selling it....nothing against it....just didn't excite me the way Subs do.
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV

"The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
SWISSAHOLICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 10:23 PM   #4
Runnin' Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Runnin' Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
My SS GMT IIc gets more wrist time then my TT GMT IIc. It's a perfect everyday watch and dresses up nice too.
__________________
Runnin' Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:15 PM   #5
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWISSAHOLICS View Post
I owned a TT GMT IIc but ended selling it....nothing against it....just didn't excite me the way Subs do.
+1

I have two Subs and never get bored
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:16 PM   #6
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAGERVEGAS View Post
My SS GMT IIc gets more wrist time then my TT GMT IIc. It's a perfect everyday watch and dresses up nice too.
My Dad wears a TT GMT IIc and the TT just falls so perfectly into place for the GMT.
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:19 PM   #7
MrCaliber
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: 16610
Posts: 31
I sold my GMTii and bought a sub.
MrCaliber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:23 PM   #8
Flyjet601
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
Had both SS and TT in the GMT IIc.....sold them both.
didnt like the case design.....too blocky for me.

Bought a Polar Exp 2 42...never been happier...

__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure
Flyjet601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:30 PM   #9
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by kymwatchlog View Post
My Dad wears a TT GMT IIc and the TT just falls so perfectly into place for the GMT.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:43 PM   #10
kxux
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
kxux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Jan
Location: PA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,110
I own GMT IIc and love wearing it. It is the most comfortable Rolex I ever owned. I have bought/sold many other pieces, but GMT stays with me.

The only thing I did was to brush the PCL to make it a true tool watch. The hairline scratches did not go well with me. Now I love it. Plan on keeping it for good.
kxux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:46 PM   #11
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by kymwatchlog View Post
My Dad wears a TT GMT IIc and the TT just falls so perfectly into place for the GMT.
I generally dislike TT watches. The GMTII is the exception. Tha watch is brilliant!
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:46 PM   #12
jay1988
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1,515
If it came with BCL's I would of bought it over the Sub simply because it's an extra function and "rarer" than the Sub.

I know it's a very simple modification but modding my first Rolex wouldn't feel right.

What does what we have to say have to do with it ? If you aren't wearing the watch then you clearly aren't a fan yourself.

Be careful of the grass is greener syndrome though. You may buy that 39mm Exp and it will get just as little wrist time. You could also start "really missing" your GMT.
jay1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 11:56 PM   #13
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Not a fan. Prefer vintage GMT.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 12:00 AM   #14
AALANMan
"TRF" Member
 
AALANMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Carl
Location: Texas
Watch: 16710 "Coke"
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
Not a fan. Prefer vintage GMT.
+1 Like the flexibility of switching bezel inserts...and not a big PCL fan.
AALANMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 12:24 AM   #15
Micha
"TRF" Member
 
Micha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
1675 for me...
__________________
life is good
Micha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 12:45 AM   #16
MichaelB_Can
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
I don't , this is my only .... , only Gmt that isName:  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1365864400.457380.jpg
Views: 730
Size:  79.4 KB


Mike B , Canada ⌚
MichaelB_Can is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 12:54 AM   #17
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
I don't have one but have been considering one seriously lately. My wife will not be happy. Between an Explorer and the GMTc, GMTc any day.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 12:59 AM   #18
Victory07
"TRF" Member
 
Victory07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 118
I have both. Stainless GMTiic and TT blue face sub c. Bought em at the same time. Liked the GMT so much never wore the sub. As a result- the Sub is for sale.
Victory07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:13 AM   #19
airchitect
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Watch: A few.....
Posts: 3,796
I did for one day. Took it back in favor of a pepsi.
airchitect is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:22 AM   #20
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
I have a lot of GMT's..

I do not have the latest Disco/nightclub GMTIIc and don't see myself ever having one...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:25 AM   #21
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay1988 View Post
If it came with BCL's I would of bought it over the Sub simply because it's an extra function and "rarer" than the Sub.

I know it's a very simple modification but modding my first Rolex wouldn't feel right.

What does what we have to say have to do with it ? If you aren't wearing the watch then you clearly aren't a fan yourself.

Be careful of the grass is greener syndrome though. You may buy that 39mm Exp and it will get just as little wrist time. You could also start "really missing" your GMT.
I totally agree. But when I had my Exp1 39, my GMT IIc also got less wrist time as well
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:27 AM   #22
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victory07 View Post
I have both. Stainless GMTiic and TT blue face sub c. Bought em at the same time. Liked the GMT so much never wore the sub. As a result- the Sub is for sale.
I am the other way round. I wear my 116613LB more than my GMT IIc, and to think I am not a true fan of TT.
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:28 AM   #23
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by airchitect View Post
I did for one day. Took it back in favor of a pepsi.
the thing is, I can't find a PEPSI coming my way.

and I may have been too used to maxi-dials already..
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:28 AM   #24
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
Not me. Z serial 16710 here.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:33 AM   #25
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
They are beauties to behold, but I have no use for a GMT watch, so it's doubtful that I'll ever own one.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 01:37 AM   #26
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
I personally love the GMTII in all its variations. My problem is I own a 16610 which aesthetics alone is very similar to the GMT and I own a 216570 which is functionally very similar to the GMT. This had made purchasing one hard to justify. I think if someone is getting their first Rolex the GMT is the only way to go but that is my opinion alone. I am going to see if Basel reveals anything new in this range and make my decision to purchase one sooner or later based on that. I also feel that the GMT is one of Rolex's best looking models in precious metals.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 02:06 AM   #27
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by kymwatchlog View Post
I really missed my Explorer I 39mm

Looking at my Rolex, thinking if the GMT IIc should go since it has the least wrist time.

What are the thoughts here? thanks..
The GMT is maybe my favorite model in the Rolex lineup. Having said that, if you don't wear yours, aren't particularly attached to keeping it, and either need the money or want to use it on something else, then sell it.

Life's too short and it's a lot of money to have tied up in something that just sits in a drawer.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 02:10 AM   #28
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
I would need a 16710 in my collection!
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 02:11 AM   #29
bigrustypig
"TRF" Member
 
bigrustypig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 1,426
I have the Sub and the GMT2C. I wear the Sub more often but it doesn't mean I love it more than the GMT2C. They are both great pieces.
bigrustypig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2013, 02:28 AM   #30
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
I had one for a long weekend if that counts
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.