The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 May 2013, 07:32 AM   #31
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by lsettle View Post
I was close in trading my 67 5513 with a ghost bezel insert. I spoke to two close friends. They both said to keep the 5513 and thats what I did.

Lawrence
Pretty consistent with everyone's feedback
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 07:33 AM   #32
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1675-David View Post
I tried on a 1977 SD today and found it to be large and too bulky for my taste, it's quite a step up in heft compaired to a 5513. My 5513 fits me perfectly so I wouldn't trade...
Excellent point, thanks for chiming in.
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 07:42 AM   #33
Wrist Candy
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 329
I prefer a date feature on my watches but I would not trade that watch.
Wrist Candy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 03:24 PM   #34
storm66
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 842
Your 5513 is just too Beautiful to part with................
storm66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 08:57 PM   #35
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,261
I would never, ever trade or sell that watch, stunning. If you have any second thoughts and you obviously do then you know that you'd regret it.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 10:52 PM   #36
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,593
I like the date idea.....
I would not sell a plexi to buy a sapphire.
A 1665 would possibly entice me to trade a 5513 but a great 5513 is still worth keeping.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 May 2013, 10:56 PM   #37
bonbonson
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: philippines
Posts: 387
I see the MF 5513 as a better investment especially since the popularity of the early 5513s over the years has increased i think it will be harder to source a 5513 as beautiful as yours compared to getting an SD. All sums up to you Good luck with the deal
bonbonson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2013, 07:25 AM   #38
strafer_kid
"TRF" Member
 
strafer_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
I would hold the 5513
strafer_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2013, 07:50 AM   #39
bluemartinifan
"TRF" Member
 
bluemartinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
Sapphire SDs in similar condition as your 5513 are far easier to find. 5513s in the condition of yours have become very hard to find and very expensive.
bluemartinifan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2013, 09:59 AM   #40
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
Wow, what an overwhelming amount of love for 5513. Thanks guys!
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2013, 10:45 AM   #41
gregorpal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Myplaceintheworld
Posts: 360
keep it! hard to find such a nice specimen. dial, inster matching hands...
gregorpal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2013, 11:50 PM   #42
eparisini
"TRF" Member
 
eparisini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Emanuele
Location: Italy
Watch: 6263 FAP
Posts: 795
Very nice 5513, but 1665 is real tool watch!
__________________
EAT, DRINK AND BE MAUI
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=20260&dateline=123539  8486
eparisini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2013, 08:20 AM   #43
kelgar21
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 29
You only provided us a pic of the 5513 - which is easy to drool over - its a beautiful watch! I'd be interested in seeing the SD in question as well.

Do you have a pic to share of the SD?

(if you want to share more of the 5513 I would be okay with that as well :)
kelgar21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2013, 11:45 AM   #44
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by kelgar21 View Post
You only provided us a pic of the 5513 - which is easy to drool over - its a beautiful watch! I'd be interested in seeing the SD in question as well.

Do you have a pic to share of the SD?

(if you want to share more of the 5513 I would be okay with that as well :)
The SD, while it's in untouched condition, it looks like any other SD out there. Here's another wrist shot if the 5513.

paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2013, 12:32 AM   #45
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
Wow, your 5513 looks even better in the second photo! Great patina, nice fat case! You would regret ever getting rid of that watch. They're getting harder and harder (and more expensive) to find like that. The modern Sea-Dwellers, while great, are just a lot easier to get, and not as cool as your 5513, IMHO.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2013, 01:40 AM   #46
kelgar21
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 29
Thanks for posting another pic of the 5513! It's amazing & I hope you hold on to it.
kelgar21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2013, 05:32 AM   #47
motoikkyu
2024 Pledge Member
 
motoikkyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,732
I have discovered as I age that the days are all very much alike. Keeping track of the date seems conformist, if not compulsive. I routinely date things "1982" and no one seems to notice...
motoikkyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 June 2013, 05:58 AM   #48
kelgar21
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
Really, trading that beautiful Sub just for the date function?! No way, not for that reason. I've said this before, and have never heard why people don't like it, but ... why not just set the bezel on a non-date Sub to the date? That's what I do, and it works great. Guess what day it is in this photo. Yup, the 17th!
You should start a post about this so others can take advantage. I have been doing this since you posted and love it!
kelgar21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.