ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Steel or FC | |||
Diver Bee | 26 | 44.07% | |
ROO 44 SS | 33 | 55.93% | |
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
8 June 2013, 08:05 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,484
|
ROO Steel vs FC
Hi guys. Welcome to another weekly poll. If both had the same price, which one would you choose and why? Also, is it true that FC Bee is really hard to come by? Or is it the ROO SS 44MM ?
Happy to hear your thoughts. |
8 June 2013, 08:13 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,484
|
Some Picks
|
8 June 2013, 09:31 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,308
|
Diver bee for me....I prefer the 42 size and lack of the 44's pushers.
|
8 June 2013, 10:04 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: David
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: R-A-P-I-O
Posts: 289
|
If both are of same price, sure will get a FC NQA, simply because its more unique and more eye catching
|
8 June 2013, 10:04 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Chicago
Posts: 283
|
I'd go carbon chrono. Not a fan of the yellow.
__________________
Ben |
8 June 2013, 10:08 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
The 44mm anything is the way to go. If anything, I would compare that Diver to 44mm FC...now you are talking.
I do like the 44mm SS because of the way it pops, but a tich heavy for me. The 44mm FC is light weight and still has a strong wrist presence. |
8 June 2013, 10:23 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Id take the FC 44mm, then FC Diver, then 44mm Panda, the last just lacks a bit of personality for me, much prefer the 42 Panda.
|
8 June 2013, 10:44 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,484
|
The only problem with the 44 FC is that it's too black. The FC Diver is nice but I dont know about the yellow. And last but not least the 44 ss is a bit more conservative? Mmmm
|
8 June 2013, 10:45 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,602
|
Diver
__________________
|
8 June 2013, 10:56 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Yeah I agree, theres parts of the FC and SS and RG Novelties that I like but not one that is just perfect to me and really stands out as a definite buy.
|
8 June 2013, 11:08 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
I think that ROO looks nicer than that diver.
|
8 June 2013, 11:11 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Diver... I like the size better.
|
8 June 2013, 11:48 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Louis
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: PP 5131R
Posts: 5,197
|
ROO looks better in my opinion but I picked the Diver because it doesn't have the chrono module, I'm still holding out hope for an integrated chrono movement on the ROO.
|
9 June 2013, 12:04 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Diver
|
9 June 2013, 12:09 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,324
|
This is a tough one b/c I can't vote for both. I currently own the SS ROO 44 and I now have the Diver Bee on the way.
|
9 June 2013, 12:39 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
44mm. I like larger size and the way the contrast of colors makes it pop.
|
9 June 2013, 12:53 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
The FC is a sexy beast. I just prefer 42mm for AP's though.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
9 June 2013, 03:33 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 15
|
The diver, as i can't pull off the 44mm size. From the looks perspective, chrono by a long shot.
|
9 June 2013, 04:33 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
If you can pull off the 44mm, then the 44 is a no brainer.
|
9 June 2013, 04:51 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
|
|
9 June 2013, 07:41 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 2,300
|
Diver
|
9 June 2013, 09:11 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 133
|
The 44 mm ss for me, the ss diver looks better than bee diver...
|
9 June 2013, 11:49 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
|
The Carbon Diver is just so crisp :)
|
10 June 2013, 01:26 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: David
Location: NYC & Scottsdale
Watch: The next one...
Posts: 296
|
I love the FC in every model especially the 44. But the problem is it's so black it blends with every other cheap black watch you see in the wild. I would go with 44 SS because of the eye catching contrast.
|
10 June 2013, 01:14 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Diver
|
11 June 2013, 05:57 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 271
|
44fc
|
11 June 2013, 06:04 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
42mm FC Diver.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.