ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 June 2013, 03:23 AM | #181 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
40mm = perfect
|
16 June 2013, 04:32 AM | #182 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Thailand
Watch: BLNR/SubC/SMP 300
Posts: 306
|
Perfect for me as well. I've got a 6 3/4 inch wrist and its just the right size
|
16 June 2013, 04:33 AM | #183 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
|
NO...style never goes out of style...fashion comes and goes.
|
24 June 2013, 07:56 AM | #184 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: Augusta Georgia
Watch: 16600
Posts: 1,058
|
My 40 mm Sub is perfection
|
24 June 2013, 07:59 AM | #185 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,062
|
no way
__________________
A.Sharp "I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland." |
24 June 2013, 08:13 AM | #186 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 31
|
I think it's just about perfect!
|
24 June 2013, 08:58 AM | #187 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 1,028
|
40mm Sub is perfect for me. Does not need to be bigger...imho
|
24 June 2013, 09:04 AM | #188 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,355
|
Way to small
|
24 June 2013, 09:12 AM | #189 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
|
just right
|
24 June 2013, 09:34 AM | #190 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NW
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 117
|
40mm is the perfect size.
__________________
Rolex Daytona 116520 ('12) Tudor BigBlock 94300 ('78) See the future but live for the moment... |
24 June 2013, 09:39 AM | #191 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: san diego
Watch: Datejust II 2012
Posts: 16
|
I think they need to go with a beefier model. I love the Panerai Luminor 48mm! THat will be my next purchase someday.... 40mm and under seem to Dainty for a real man..HA
|
24 June 2013, 09:40 AM | #192 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
|
|
24 June 2013, 09:43 AM | #193 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
|
NO! it is perfect
|
24 June 2013, 09:49 AM | #194 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Watch: The Throne
Posts: 375
|
The ceramic has added glitz and glam that larger pieces seek - without increasing the size. I think the 40mm is still perfect.
|
24 June 2013, 09:55 AM | #195 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
|
|
24 June 2013, 10:05 AM | #196 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
For me, my 40mm Sub is perfect. I am so over this maxi watch case thing. They are fine for many people, and the watch makers ought to have models that appeal to such buyers. But there is nothing to suggest that a model with a +50 year track record of success should be changed based on current trends, sort of like changing the formula for Coke.
Next we'll be debating whether Rolex should make a Datejust 1.5
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
24 June 2013, 10:29 AM | #197 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
yes. to small. i do not like wearing a watch that WOMEN wear on a regular basis.
not just rolex, but small watches in general. |
24 June 2013, 10:55 AM | #198 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Winnipeg CANADA
Posts: 57
|
I have a 7" wrist and have worn the sub for nearly 30 years and have seen it go from "Wow! That watch is huge!" to have people call it smallish.
I recently bought a Panerai 299 and while doing my research I thought it might be too large. It looks just fine on my smaller wrist but could not go any larger. Both my subs are the older style and feel like an old friend. While it is not as large as some of the obscenely large watches out there I think it is the perfect size. Though big guys with huge wrists may tend to find it almost lady-like when you compare it to the 47mm and larger Omegas and bigger stuff like the U-Boat and other alarm clocks for the wrist. That said I tried on an Oris Divers / Small seconds the other day and it looked just fine despite being 47mm. It's the tapered case that makes it look OK even on my wrist. Wayne |
24 June 2013, 11:18 AM | #199 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Brtlg
Posts: 461
|
I think they could do different size subs like they do with Datejusts and Yachtmasters....I think a 45 mm and a 40 mm would make everyone happy
EricE
__________________
EricE Watch addict Michigan |
24 June 2013, 11:25 AM | #200 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
Odd that you let current women's fashion influence your watch purchasing decisions. I suppose if women everywhere started wearing Fifty Fathoms then you'd have to avoid those too.
|
24 June 2013, 11:31 AM | #201 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I wouldn't let a random shot of a C list celebrity at a Miami Heat game serve as a barometer for what is fashionable wristwear for the ladies. Most women wearing the large watches are wearing Michael Korrs fashion pieces, not necessarily high end time pieces.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
24 June 2013, 12:15 PM | #202 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
|
No...can't second guess a design that has stood the test of time to the point of becoming iconic.
Elegance and style last forever... fashion comes and goes...like wrist clocks. |
24 June 2013, 12:57 PM | #203 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Too small. Too shiny. |
|
24 June 2013, 01:03 PM | #204 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
The 16610 is too small on my frame in my opinion, but the 116610 looks great.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
24 June 2013, 01:07 PM | #205 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
no it's fine the way it is and has always been, most love it as it is imho
__________________
watches many |
24 June 2013, 01:11 PM | #206 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Angelo, TX
Watch: Rlx,Omega,JLC,Breg
Posts: 1,699
|
40 mm isn't small regardless of wrist size...perfect fit. And, the Sub wears larger than it is.
__________________
|
24 June 2013, 01:26 PM | #207 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,252
|
i guess my opinion is jaded because i have big flat wrists.... i guess 40mm is probably perfect for most of the normal sized folks..
|
24 June 2013, 01:41 PM | #208 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PE - BR
Posts: 558
|
Very subjective question, It all depends on your body build and wrist size.
Its like asking if a size 32 pant is too small and others complaining a 36 is too big. I never get this too big/small threads, useless imo.
__________________
126600 126603 116900 116610LV 116610LN 226570 AP15703 PAM029 HBB44 |
24 June 2013, 02:51 PM | #209 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
before its big. now its small
|
24 June 2013, 03:15 PM | #210 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Adelaide
Watch: 14060 Sub
Posts: 332
|
Here's a pic of my Sub on my 8.75" wrist. I've never thought it was too small, but after a wearing a Speedy for a week or so, it does take a little to adjust to. I can get away with wearing a larger watch, but a 44mm on a 7" wrist
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.