|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one do you like better? | |||
| 372 |
   
|
78 | 69.64% |
| 390 |
  
|
34 | 30.36% |
| Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15 August 2013, 09:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
Lets vote! PAM 372 or PAM 390
Which one do you like?
372  390 
|
|
|
|
15 August 2013, 10:03 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
372
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 4
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
|
|
|
|
15 August 2013, 11:01 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Raymond
Location: Sunny Island
Posts: 604
|
If it is down to only these two, I would go for the 372 because of its dome crystal.
__________________
Don't Worry Be Happy!!  IG: @Arteray |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 12:17 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
390 is an overhyped joke
Just another 44 mm luminor like we have already a zillion different variations. Gold hands, Brown dial .... so what ?? The 372 is imo the mosr beautifull panerai since several years
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 12:52 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
Seriously? Not a fair contest! 372 for sure!
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:07 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
372
__________________
member#3242 |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:10 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Simple 3 7 2. Great Panerai.
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:19 AM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
|
Why is 372? Is it because of the crown guard? Or its because 47mm? Or the movement?
For the size, People here always think 40mm is big watch. (check the rolex section. Many of them go for 36mm). But this one is damn big watch 47mm, big as monster LOL I need ur opinion to explain. Thanks folks! :) |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:27 AM
|
#9 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
372 but then again i'm biased . Harmony and simplicity !!! And tons of DNA....
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:27 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
The 372 is better looking to me because of the black dial makes the gold coloring pop. I also love the way the printing on the dial looks. Unfortunately, I find it too large for my wrist. I still vote for it over the 390!
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:32 AM
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Another vote for 372
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:37 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: NJ
Watch: Pam Patek Rolex AP
Posts: 794
|
390 all day long... more durable with the sapphire crystal, unique pinkish brown dial only found on this watch, only 44mm luminor with gold hands, SE of only 2000 instead of a regular production piece like the 372 and also a LOT cheaper.
The 390 will probably go up in value over the next few years while the 372 will either fall or stay the same as time goes on. |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:46 AM
|
#13 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
|
And a pic
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:57 AM
|
#14 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,988
|
if you can rock with 372, then it will win for sure............but for me, 390 fits better on my wrist though. 390 got my vote
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 02:06 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
|
I like the looks of the 390 better. It gets my vote
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 02:07 AM
|
#16 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
It's 47mm base Luminor perfection... plexi & all. That & it looks so damn good.   
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 02:36 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 03:13 AM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,248
|
372........
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 06:10 AM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
|
three7two.No question
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:16 PM
|
#20 | |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,298
|
Quote:
x2....there's a lot to like about the 372, but if I could only choose between a 372 and a 390 for me, it would very likely be the 390. There is one thing I prefer straight up on the 390 over the 372: the font size and shape. |
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 01:33 PM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
372, but I am biased
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 02:17 PM
|
#22 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 August 2013, 07:49 PM
|
#23 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
372, but only just
Sandwich dial swung it
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 03:53 AM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: 116523, 79220B
Posts: 49
|
Definitely 372, no ifs, ands or buts
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 04:09 AM
|
#25 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
|
the poll is closer than i thought
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 05:36 AM
|
#26 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,486
|
3
7 2 |
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 05:43 AM
|
#27 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
372 every time.
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 08:50 AM
|
#28 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Reese
Location: NYC
Posts: 177
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 01:36 PM
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Guillermo
Location: Bangkok
Watch: IWC, PAM, Rolex
Posts: 310
|
I think 47 mm is simply too much. It hard to wear regularly unless you are an athlete or in the music business. I will stick to my 328!
|
|
|
|
|
17 August 2013, 01:55 PM
|
#30 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
If you've got the size to pull off 47mm it's very easy to wear, especially the 372, it wears noticeably smaller than say a 305.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 4
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
