ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 November 2013, 04:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Zachary Tyler
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 77
|
Seadweller 16600
Am I alone in feeling this was vastly superior to the redesign deep sea? One of the best they've ever made. Wore my friend's deep sea the other day and it's just so gaudy w/ the words on inner bezel, unnecessarily thick case. Gaudy. Don't like the big cases Rolex is trending to a la Deep Sea & YM2.
Message- I miss the Sea Dweller. My first Rolex ever. |
17 November 2013, 04:31 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
You are likely not alone, however I tried on the DSSD and I ponder a purchase daily. It's a meat of a watch. Albeit, I'd never sell my SD for it, just add to the Sub family.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
17 November 2013, 04:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
I love my 16600 but I do also like the Deep Sea; it's too big for me but I do like the design. I wonder if they will bring out a new version of the Sea Dweller, a smaller Deep Sea.
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
17 November 2013, 04:39 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
I like the SD more than the DSSD
|
17 November 2013, 04:52 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,975
|
I had a SD and would have owned a Sub if it weren't for the cyclops. Very few need the depth rating of the SD and no one needs that of the DSSD. Come to think of it, I should have just started with a ND Sub and might still own it.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too |
17 November 2013, 05:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Grand Junction CO
Watch: A few, not enough.
Posts: 1,725
|
DSSD certainly looks the part but is too much watch for me. The 16600 would be my choice but really a Submariner is all I need.
|
17 November 2013, 05:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Watch: 14060M SS Daytona
Posts: 165
|
I started out with a no date Sub 45 years ago. After all that time and a great many watches, I recently bought a 16600 with lug holes in excellent, almost mint condition.
I love the size, weight and the date without the cyclops. Maybe my last watch. LOL. |
17 November 2013, 05:21 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
|
17 November 2013, 05:24 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SA, Texas.
Watch: * { SD & DJ } *
Posts: 943
|
You are not alone....... I tried on the DSSD the first time I saw it and that thing was not for me... The SD16600 & older models were master pieces.
__________________
......... All In. |
17 November 2013, 05:28 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
I love the 16600 (and the 666, for that matter) - great examples there, Clay.
Here's my SD (16600) - about time I got it out again, but just been enjoying the 1675 and 1680 so much recently. I like the DSSD, but I reckon it will be huge on me, so I'll stick with the more subtle older brother. Cheers, K. |
17 November 2013, 06:17 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
The SD is an easier fit for most, it goes deeper than any normal human will ever need and was more affordable when new. Now in the pre-owned market the same applies.
So I'd take SD over DSSD all day long.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
17 November 2013, 06:37 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Hey no problem, buy the SD and be happy. I had a SD and couldn't stand how skinny the hour markers are and nearly non existent lume, compared to the modern line and the Omegas I was used to. Still an awesome watch though, but just not for me.
So I sold it and bought a Deepsea and could not be happier. Yes it's big but there's a reason and if this reason doesn't serve your needs, hey, guess what plenty of options in the Rolex stable to include the millions of SDs still floating around. Plenty of Rolexes I don't like, no point in wasting energy in what I'm not going to buy or like, much more useful to be positive. I could understand if this was a comparison in which both watches were scrutinized for pros and cons or you needed help in deciding which one, since you like both, this doesn't seem like that. And I don't feel the SD is vastly superior to the Deepsea. We could talk specifics....but they're just different watches and serve different needs for everyone. If your needs are xyz then those needs may make it a better choice, for you, or superior if you will in that sense. Show us your SD, always like to look at pics of it anyway. |
17 November 2013, 07:44 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16600
Posts: 338
|
The 16600 is my all time favorite Rolex, bar none. However, I am looking forward to a Deep Sea at some point. At first, I thought it would be too big, so I purchased a huge beater mechanical diver watch to try and live with. I now know I can live with the deep sea.
|
17 November 2013, 07:46 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
|
Quote:
|
|
17 November 2013, 07:49 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
17 November 2013, 07:51 AM | #16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
Quote:
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2 |
|
17 November 2013, 09:07 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Chevy Chase
Watch: WG Daytona
Posts: 1,088
|
I think the 16600 is the best dive watch rolex has ever made. Everyone could wear one. I like the New DSSD but I can't wear it because of the size. I am just disappointed that they no longer offer that class of dive watch in my size. If anything hopefully the 16600 will go up in value.
|
17 November 2013, 09:15 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
My favorite Rolex!...but hey, to each their own.
|
17 November 2013, 09:32 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 46
|
I do like the 16600, it's an awesome watch, but IMHO any diving watch without a 60 minute bezel is useless for timing a dive. Same with the planet ocean, there's no accuracy with a 15 minute bezel! But that's purely for diving, as styling and size goes each to there own!
|
17 November 2013, 09:51 AM | #20 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
Quote:
|
|
17 November 2013, 10:10 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,602
|
Very precise times
16600 is my favorite watch...there are others that take some time away from it but it remains #1.
__________________
|
17 November 2013, 10:11 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 46
|
|
17 November 2013, 10:48 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex 116200 + SD
Posts: 240
|
This is how I felt after wearing the SDDS . . . . . . SD 16600 way better watch, masterpiece.
|
17 November 2013, 10:57 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
The SD 4000 is probably my all time favorite rolex and probably the only watch I would trade my 14060 for
|
17 November 2013, 10:59 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
Let me rephrase that .. My favorite MODERN rolex ..
|
17 November 2013, 11:34 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Quote:
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
|
17 November 2013, 12:14 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,848
|
I love all forms of the Sea Dweller (including the Deepsea) but I agree that the 16600 is a particularly great/classic looking watch. If all goes as planned, I should be picking one up in about 2 weeks!
__________________
afc1 Watch Collection: Rolex and AP |
8 December 2013, 01:41 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boonton USA
Watch: 16600 SD Z
Posts: 60
|
I have the SD and my buddy has the deep sea, the SD fits me perfect and the deep sea is too big. That what most say, "I tried it on and it was too big"
But over the past year I take his deep sea all the time and put it on. Walk around with It spend the day getting used to the weight of it. It deff grows on you, or at least it did on me. My point is I think the deep sea needs more than just a try on to fully appreciate it for what it is. He tells me that after the first week he never notices how large it is. But in the end SD is still my choice. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
8 December 2013, 01:58 PM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
|
|
8 December 2013, 07:37 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 623
|
I like the DSSD but the 16600 SD is very special and it's no surprise to see there price constantly rise, probably the best Rolex ever produced IMHO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.