ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 February 2008, 01:25 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,074
|
Since they are both bought and payed for I would try to keep both. If you are hung up on only keeping one I would keep the GMT. I only have 1 valuable watch (GMT) and wear it every day, everywhere. IMO it's a better looking watch than the Omega. And you already know that it will keep its value.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
28 February 2008, 02:13 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Arturo
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: Black GMT ll
Posts: 1,271
|
I Gree with East Bay. Life is short. measure those precious moments with the most elegant watch you can afford. The grass is not greener, and when you swith it out, there will be another, and after price increase you will really be upside down. Keep it for sure. Much more practical and useful in life than a Milgauss. A real man's watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.