ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 March 2014, 09:47 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
AP 15202 v AP 154000
Such a big difference...
See my 15400 next to the 15202! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 March 2014, 10:04 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Nothing like the 15202 IMHO!! AP perfection at it's greatest! Cheers,
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
14 March 2014, 10:56 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
15202 is the original AP RO design. 15400 is a chunkier, sportier version.
|
14 March 2014, 11:21 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Yes this latest AP RO which harks back to the 5402 is the first Jumbo I have really liked since then and despite no seconds hand or hacking I would prefer this to the 3 and 400s, which are still obviously fantastic watches.
|
14 March 2014, 11:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
As a person in the market for a Jumbo, I have to ask: is the almost 2X cost of the 15202 over the 15300 (I want 39mm) justified?
If I go 15300, I can also afford a second watch to add to the collection. If I go 15202, my budget is blown for a long time! Decisions, decisions. |
15 March 2014, 12:05 AM | #6 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2014, 12:52 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 141
|
Quote:
|
|
15 March 2014, 01:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
|
I love the 15300. I also love the 15202...
If it was my money though I think I would be going with the 15300 and pocketing the cash. |
15 March 2014, 01:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Manila
Posts: 43
|
Its amazing how 2mm make such a huge difference. Just by looking at the pics here. I have a small wrist and the 15400 is as big as it gets, i mean max. for my wrist already. So im saving up to try the 15202. The price and scarcity is quite a challenge.
|
15 March 2014, 03:17 AM | #10 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
AP 15202 v AP 154000
Quote:
Quote:
I have to admit I haven't done the wrist comparison first. Which I know will give me the best info possible. From the other WIS comments, it's clear those who own the 15202 wouldn't consider anything else in its place. That certainly means a lot. I was also thinking about searching for a vintage Jumbo It looks like that might split the cost difference...but clearly hard to find, even harder with provenance. |
||
15 March 2014, 03:29 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Totally logical and if I'd never worn each on my wrist, I'd agree with you 100%. However the heart beats ever so much faster, you sweat just a little bit more, and your mouth gets slightly drier when you have the 15202 on. Of course, the only real solution is to have both.
|
15 March 2014, 03:42 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Jamie
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
The question is eamonn are you going to get the 15202???
|
15 March 2014, 03:50 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Very informative comparison.
__________________
newb watch collector |
15 March 2014, 06:55 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: James
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 15400
Posts: 246
|
|
15 March 2014, 08:10 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Batman, Kermit
Posts: 1,097
|
Quote:
You really need to try each on to see and feel the difference. The 15300 is a beautiful watch and a great value. I tried to fall in love with it but just didn't, and as odd as it sounds I didn't like its second hand & the tail on it. I tried a 15400 but to me the proportions weren't quite right. Then it bothered me I could tell the movement was from a smaller watch. I tried on the 15202 and everything came together. No second hand to bother me, the dial color was stunning its a different color blue than AP uses on other pieces, and the proportions were perfect. Combine that with the iconic ultra thin automatic movement, and I knew which was right for me. All are great watches, and no watch can be every thing to everyone. So try them in person and you will know if the jumbo is worth its price. I question if a simple time only watch could be worth that amount and IMHO, yes it is. |
|
15 March 2014, 10:15 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Khalid
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,328
|
IMO, The very awesome 15202 & 15305 (open worked) are the BEST in the whole RO collection.
__________________
Life is too short, to waste time hating anyone!. Instagram: @PatekCollector |
16 March 2014, 02:09 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
|
16 March 2014, 04:57 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: all of them
Posts: 653
|
I just left the local Toronto AD.
Ok, now I get it. The ultra thin is amazing. I first tried the 15400, then a luscious rose gold dual time, and then she brought out the ultra thin... And it just feels perfect. Quote:
And now to work magic with the finances...and wife. |
|
16 March 2014, 05:21 AM | #19 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
16 March 2014, 05:43 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
Both superb, quality wise. How much is total satisfaction worth? In my case, with small wrists, the smaller but thicker 15450 would seem to be the best vs the larger but thinner 15202. But, the 202 fit me better, sold the 15450...
|
16 March 2014, 06:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
Wow! The 15202 looks amazing on you sir!
|
18 March 2014, 03:49 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chicago / Boca
Posts: 361
|
I've been struggling with the same question for the last few weeks - 15202 vs 15400, either in SS w/blue dial....
After trying a few on, I'm thinking 15400, as I'm a bigger guy (6'1", 225) and can handle the size, and it provides flexibility to wear as a dress watch as it fits under cuff and doesn't look too big, or with jeans as it's large enough for me... Now the hunt to find a good price... |
18 March 2014, 06:26 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spain
Posts: 250
|
Not trying to offend anyone but in my opinion the 15400 has lost much of the 39 mm series flair. It seems to me somewhat disproportionate since the bracelet size is the same of 15300 but the case is 2 mm bigger.
|
18 March 2014, 07:49 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
|
18 March 2014, 09:18 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Damn this thread! I NEED to try on a Jumbo. Curious what those think about it with larger wrists though. Mine are a flat 7.25"...
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
18 March 2014, 09:26 AM | #26 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
My wrist flat 7 3/8th's and fits perfectly!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
19 March 2014, 06:40 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
what were your impressions trying both at the same time???? fwiw, i thought the 202 fit you much better. same answer as above no question about it, Jumbo is money well spent:cheers
__________________
|
|
19 March 2014, 07:01 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
Hah!
I hear you but I have recently tried to sell my 15400 but would suffer a big loss. So what's stopping me?? 1. Love my 15400 blue dial I have. I actually prefer the blue shade better than the latest I series. 2. It would cost me 8k USD to trade up. Is it worth it?? 3. Stick with the 15400 and then use saved money to buy a patek aquanaut. This will be a good edition to my AP, GMT, JLC MUT Moon and Reverso duo. 4. I actually love wearing my 15400 and find it comfortable and at present it's a comfortable and perfect work watch. 5. The 15202 (a beautiful piece) is somewhat fragile and the high servicing costs is a turn-off. |
19 March 2014, 07:02 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
|
AP 15202 v AP 154000
Quote:
Hah! I hear you but I have recently tried to sell my 15400 but would suffer a big loss. So what's stopping me?? 1. Love my 15400 blue dial H series. I actually prefer the blue shade better than the latest I series. 2. It would cost me 8k USD to trade up. Is it worth it?? 3. Stick with the 15400 and then use saved money to buy a patek aquanaut. This will be a good addition to my AP, GMT, JLC MUT Moon and Reverso duo. 4. I actually love wearing my 15400 and find it comfortable and at present it's a comfortable and a perfect work watch. 5. The 15202 (a beautiful piece) is somewhat fragile and the high servicing costs is a turn-off. |
|
19 March 2014, 07:11 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.