ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 June 2014, 10:10 PM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PARIS
Watch: Vintage
Posts: 2,761
|
|
8 June 2014, 10:22 PM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
Don't think it's a bubble. The rise has been consistent, slow, and steady.
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
10 June 2014, 01:29 AM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 548
|
The hobby is alive and well more people are able to participate than ever before
These watches where produced in a world where much of the global middle class or higher wealth was concentrated in the US/Developed Europe there were fewer wealthy people in general so fewer watches produced. Prices may have been lower but more people were worried about dinner in those days. While it saddens me that some watches are growing out of reach financially I think we can all agree more people having a higher quality of life is a good thing for everyone. More goods and services sold more opportunity. |
10 June 2014, 01:49 AM | #94 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Planet
Posts: 256
|
I don't think its a bubble either. I actually think vintage rolexes are UNDER valued at the moment.
1680s, 5513s, 1016s, 1675s, snowflakes, 1803s, 1603s can all be had for less than the cost of a modern Rolex. Think about that for a moment. I'd aliken it to vintage muscle cars and their modern day equivalents. In most cases the vintage costs a whole hell of a lot more and we're talking about vehicles that have a much shorter shelf life than watches. The case is made even stronger when you consider that a modern rolex doesn't do anything better than a vintage rolex in terms of keeping time (the way a modern mustang can smoke the hell out of a 68'). So all you have is a diminishing supply and an increasing demand (a 70s sub is never going out of style). I don't see any bubble bursting any time soon. I'm going to purchase the quintessential vintages in the best conditions that I can find in the next year or so and just enjoy the shit out of them for the next 50 years. Otherwise, I fear that I'll never be able to justify spending THAT much for a watch. I'd bet good money that in 10 years time, there is no way in hell you'd be able to buy a quality vintage for the price of a modern rolex. |
10 June 2014, 02:21 AM | #95 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,462
|
Yeah, I'm thinking this is not a bubble at all. As a corollary, in the mid-90s, when I was living in DC where I grew up, a guitar store called Southworth had an incredible collection of '58 - '60 Les Paul sunbursts. They were going for around $30,000 ea. And insane amount of money that we assumed was a bubble that would have to burst soon.
Now, 20 years later, they're worth $300,000 or more. At the time, I wish....prayed!...I had that kind of cash, but it was simply out of the question. Would I spend $300,000 on one now? Besides not being able to, and even AFTER I saw the increase, a part of me believes the prices must be at their peak. So, no. And yet....another part of me can see them being worth a million in ten years. So, yeah, I brought a gilt dial 5513 last year for more money than I'm fully comfortable with...but, not entirely UNcomfortable with....and, I'm feeling very confident that this was a wise investment. |
10 June 2014, 02:45 AM | #96 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Planet
Posts: 256
|
Dude ..... so glad to see someone shares my own anxiety. LOL I think part of my post is just trying to justify my own recent purchase. Time will tell.
|
10 June 2014, 05:29 AM | #97 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london, uk.
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
There are still only the same amount of vintage watches, they haven't increased production . |
|
10 June 2014, 10:26 AM | #98 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
|
10 June 2014, 12:22 PM | #99 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
|
Quote:
Until that happens prices - all prices - will go up. After, all bets are off. |
|
10 June 2014, 12:24 PM | #100 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
|
Quote:
|
|
10 June 2014, 02:44 PM | #101 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 234
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex 16753 Rootbeer GMT, 16803 Submariner Accutron Swiss Spaceview N3 Movado Astronic HS360 01.0010.436 Omega Flightmaster 145.036, 145.012 Speedmaster Enicar Sherpa Guide MKII |
|
10 June 2014, 11:13 PM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
|
|
11 June 2014, 01:03 PM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: mississippi river
Posts: 3,194
|
Rolex was never suppose to be an "affordable" watch.
10 years ago a new sub listed for $4,000 and you could buy vintage for $2,000 - $3,000 and no crown guards for $4,000. Now list for a new sub is $8,500. You can buy vintage for $3,500 to $6,000, still under new model prices. No crown guards can be had for $8,000 - $10,000 if not a large crown. Roughly same ratio of price with the new watch 10 years ago. Everything has become inflated, except for our pay. |
11 June 2014, 05:33 PM | #104 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
NCG for 8-10k? Don't see a lot of them :-)
|
11 June 2014, 10:47 PM | #105 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,426
|
Quote:
|
|
11 June 2014, 11:29 PM | #106 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
|
I understand your point in regards to the quantity of watches available. However, what I meant was that at one point I could go a very long time without seeing someone with a vintage watch on, and now I see vintage watches strapped to people's wrists quite frequently. Therefore, actually wearing a cool vintage watch is not as exclusive as it once was due to the high # of people wearing them.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270 - Tudor Black Bay - 79230B - Tudor Chronograph - 79270P - Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv. - Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype |
12 June 2014, 04:02 AM | #107 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 983
|
|
12 June 2014, 05:56 AM | #108 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
He'll show you, but you have to dig 6 feet to get them....
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
22 June 2014, 02:58 AM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hong kong
Posts: 50
|
The demand are for those sports models. You can still find bargains for those Smaller non-sports models...
|
22 June 2014, 03:18 AM | #110 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Quote:
Time to buy then
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
|
22 June 2014, 03:35 AM | #111 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Dayto/5164
Posts: 1,631
|
Its not a bubble and Prices will raise to the sky for one simple reason :
Every year a small % of vintage 5513,1665 etc... are getting destroyed and lost. 1% a year ? So 10% in 10 years of the stock will desapear Less products on the market and more demand
__________________
IG : @aka_karbo |
22 June 2014, 05:04 AM | #112 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
|
22 June 2014, 05:08 AM | #113 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
A significant percentage of vintage Rolexes are Frankenwatches or outright fakes, and the owners do not even realize it. Musician John Mayer collects them and bought several Franken-vintages from a well known dealer whom he trusted and with whom he had a long relationship. And Mayer reportedly has solid knowledge of vintages. He is currently suing the dealer. Be careful out there.
|
22 June 2014, 07:20 AM | #114 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
22 June 2014, 08:24 AM | #115 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Lol.
|
22 June 2014, 08:34 AM | #116 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
If your comment is meant as sarcasm, you should know that there are likely people on this forum who think they own genuine vintage watches. I hope everyone's watch is authentic. But you never know. My post was meant kindly, and for the new buyers.
Museums - every art museum - have a basement with fakes that they once thought were authentic, until newer technology could disauthenticate them. And all these works of art were at one time considered genuine by experts. My source for this is Art News and my own experience. So even experts can be fooled. Like I said, be careful. If it does not apply to you, then it does not apply to you. But new buyers entering the vintage market may not be so knowledgeable. Google the subject if you doubt me. |
22 June 2014, 08:46 AM | #117 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
22 June 2014, 10:49 AM | #118 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
So I was wrong to caution new vintage buyers about frankenwatches and fakes? Do we encourage them and later, when they proudly display their new vintage, point out the flaws?
Someone is buying the myriad faux Rolexes on ebay. It may seem like a few to you, but seems like a lot a inauthentic Rolexes are on the market to me. Again, search on John Mayer and Rolexes to see how even experienced collectors can be fooled. How can you argue against a polite caution to new buyers? I'll leave this thread, and let the readers decide how to buy vintage watches. I hope they are cautious and careful. But it is up to them. Quote:
|
|
22 June 2014, 12:47 PM | #119 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own.
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_ |
22 June 2014, 02:46 PM | #120 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: ♛ + Ω +
Posts: 601
|
I'm really happy this has been posted as I feel it is the most important debate in vintage Rolex today.
I've always loved watches since I was very young, and I arguably still am having recently turned 30. In the last handful of years I have be fortunate enough to have some disposable income to spend on this hobby, so I began to buy, and sell, and buy again. I was mostly interested in newish watches as I didn't know much about vintage and wanted to make sure I was wearing something I could truly rely on. However the vintage stuff began to captivate me: the plexiglass crystals, the different shades of patina, silver date wheels, open 6's and 9's and all the different types of history of the buyers and the time they were made. So recently I totally changed my collecting strategy, selling anything I had that was new and I didn't have significant attachment to, in order to focus on vintage. Simply put, I know I can buy any of the new models for the next few decades, but I feel we are in the last stages of being able to ever own the classic models from the 60s and 70s without the kind of investment I know I won't be comfortable with, especially for something so easily broken, stolen or damaged through the years. That said, I wouldn't buy them if I didn't truly love them and want to WEAR them every day. Do I consider them a form of an investment? Well, I guess you could ask my savings account that. But one of the great thing about any Rolex is that it is a way to park money while enjoying it every day. Would I cash out my 401k in order to pick up a some serious vintage pieces? Even if it might be a much better investment in the long run, I absolutely would not. Part of this hobby is understanding the opportunity cost, the fact that each time you choose a new piece, it means all the others will have to wait. Its part of the fun and chase. This is especially pertinent in vintage watches where there is a real possibility they will be much more expensive by the next time you have saved up again. But there is another part of this hobby I've begun to understand which I find to be an important part of it. ThomasPP once said to me, Quote:
Fine watches are becoming no different, except you can enjoy them during every part of your day. The older ones are of course more rare, and to some more beautiful, but at the end of the day most of us get enjoy some of each, old and new. For how much longer who knows, I'm not looking to find out, which is why I'm placing emphasis on them now. Picasso loved his Pateks:
__________________
My Watch Blog - http://www.wristtimes.com Collection: Rolex Sub NDc 114060 | Omega SMP 861 | Apple Watch SS |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.