ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 August 2014, 08:44 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
Real or fake check
Is this real or fake ?
Last edited by sleddog; 15 August 2014 at 01:43 PM.. |
15 August 2014, 11:40 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
take more pics of the case referenceand band references
__________________
watches many |
15 August 2014, 12:17 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
|
15 August 2014, 03:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
Number says 93150?
|
15 August 2014, 07:17 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
Pics are bad and chances are high that that's a fake.
And I am not gonna tell which are the hints - there are plenty. |
15 August 2014, 10:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Felipe
Location: Brazil
Watch: ALL rolex models
Posts: 397
|
Fake
|
16 August 2014, 12:59 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
I'll take better pics later on reason why I'm asking if it's fake is because my father took it to a random jewelry store for service and went on vacation and it stayed there for over a month and we think they swapped it for a fake. The number under the band says 93150?
Here's pics of the box and certificate when he bought new |
16 August 2014, 01:41 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
|
blurry photos = fake POS
|
16 August 2014, 08:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Zürich
Watch: Submariner 5512
Posts: 922
|
Excuse me folks, but there are no indications why this one should be a fake, don't jump into conclusions, if you are not sure.
|
16 August 2014, 08:42 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
more pictures
|
16 August 2014, 10:05 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
|
wrong date font and tritium markers look to be the wrong colour for the age. How about some in-focus pics including all the reference markers and first part of SN?
|
16 August 2014, 12:27 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: vancouver
Watch: 14060 & 16570
Posts: 183
|
Take off the band and check the sn#and see if it is the original watch
|
16 August 2014, 12:38 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
That watch looks more right than wrong to me, but the lighting and such distort features quite a bit.
None of the unmistakeable clues seem to be there, yet to me, it just looks off and that's because of miniscule things that lighting and focus can affect. Either take it to an AD to have it authenticated or walk away if you're thinking of buying it. Subs aren't rare. Better pictures all around and good clear pictures of the model and serial numbers between the lugs might be helpful.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
16 August 2014, 12:44 PM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,821
|
I would like to see the inside lid of the box more clearly. Also, check the serial number on the side of the case by removing the bracelet. That will tell you if the watch was replaced. Nothing about the watch screams fake to me.
|
16 August 2014, 01:03 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
|
second batch of photos look better. The serial number check will answer the question. Perhaps not such a great idea to leave the watch at a random jeweller.
|
18 August 2014, 03:01 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 360
|
any updates for us? What was the outcome of the serial number check? Detailed photos of the inside of the box? Looks suspicious how you start a thread like this and then shy away from questions that will prove the authenticiity of the watch.
|
18 August 2014, 01:37 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Dan O
Location: Park City, UT
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 741
|
Yes, hope to get an update from the OP soon. I'm new to Rolex, and if I can't see what's wrong with it, I want to learn. This is a little scary.
__________________
-Dan, WIS In Training 116520 Cosmograph Daytona 116622 & 16622 Yacht-Master 114060 & 14060 Submariner |
18 August 2014, 01:47 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Mutee
Location: Pakistan
Watch: Berguet
Posts: 143
|
Looks fine to me
|
18 August 2014, 02:38 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
That is one scary fake if it is fake.
Please stop taking pictures with your camera phone the hints used to identify if its a fake are being "blurred." Either get pics with a good camera and gets some shots with our the band on or take it to Beverly Hills RSC and ask them for a service estimate. If they actually had it back to you and give you a price...its real....if not they will shred it;) |
18 August 2014, 02:49 PM | #20 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,821
|
Why is your username in the photos? Are you trying to sell it?
|
18 August 2014, 03:28 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Florida
Watch: 5060/a
Posts: 1,119
|
Shows he is taking the pictures...
He could have at least set the date correctly on the watch...its obviously running... |
19 August 2014, 09:19 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: AE/SG
Posts: 316
|
IMHO Thats not fake. Not 100% sure about the box the pics are not good but all seems ok.
|
19 August 2014, 11:06 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Sayub
Location: UK, East Midlands
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 423
|
looks fine to me, albeit the date font is off putting..
I would say its a mix and match of fake and gen parts. Best bet is to stay away and like others have said, subs aren't rare... find another. Cheers |
19 August 2014, 01:48 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 94
|
Anyone saying he should look elsewhere and walk away from this one should really read the original post before posting. He's not buying it. The watch belongs to his father, who left it at a watch smith for a month and they are worried that his fathers genuine sub was swapped for a fake.
That being said, it looks OK, that reference of sub isn't a common replica. To be sure either remove the bracelet and check the serial against his paperwork or take it to an ad for a service estimate. |
20 August 2014, 03:00 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Honolulu
Watch: Rolex, PP
Posts: 235
|
Nice of your dad to take pics of it new with your username that you just started this month and only have 5 posts with. Fishy.....So within 19 days your dad bought a sub with box, took pics of it with your SN, sent it into service, and received a "fake" back?
__________________
Patek Philippe 5167, Rolex DJ 116234, Omega Seamaster 300M, Breitling Emergency Mission |
20 August 2014, 03:27 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,349
|
Always ask the watchmaker to put the movement serial number and case serial number on your receipt and confirm them upon pick up before leaving with your watch.
Of course, this doesn't protect against every possibly injustice, but it will at least lead the watchmaker to believe that you know what you're doing. Most unscrupulous jewelers/watchmakers take advantage of people's ignorance... |
20 August 2014, 05:50 AM | #27 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
the op is not saying his dad bought the watch and took pictures of the box and warranty with his sn on them. he is saying "here is what came with the watch when it was purchased new". he's including his name on the pictures so it shows that the op is the one taking the pictures, which was addressed a few posts above. |
|
29 August 2014, 10:53 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Samuel e zende
Location: New york
Posts: 6
|
Sorry guys I haven't been on here we took the watch to two different jewelry shops and they both checked out as real even a pawn shop. My father has had the watch for awhile now I believe 8 years or so and the reason I took pictures next to my username is because I'm on various car forums and they require pictures with username to show its legit so it's just a habit. Thank you all for your time and responses.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.