ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 September 2014, 04:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Watch: DateJust II
Posts: 36
|
Apple Watch
Spend thousands on a Rolex or get an Apple Watch?
Just wondering how many of you guys will be getting the Apple Watch or what your feelings are about it? I want one but can't envisage wearing one instead of my Rolex unless I'm at the gym. |
10 September 2014, 04:38 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
getting the iPhone 6 will be good enough, Rolex stays on wrist unless Polar HR monitor is on
|
10 September 2014, 04:44 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 673
|
It's not a compelling product. Looks like they did what they could with the concept but meh.
|
10 September 2014, 04:45 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: My overnight bag
Watch: 16613 & 116710BLNR
Posts: 572
|
Iphone 6... Maybe... My 5 is still holding up fine.
I already own two smart watches. They are called G-Shocks. They sync up with the atomic clock and are deathly accurate. I'll say it again... This "wearable technology", is not a watch. It's just another digital leash. After all, my phone tells time too, and it's not called a pocket watch. This wearable technology is just softening people up to the idea of simply having a chip implanted in your head a few years from now. Just think... In a few years... The I-Chip. It will do everything. Take a look at your grand kid's future. Resistance is futile... |
10 September 2014, 04:48 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,149
|
Looks like a home run to me...good thing I have two wrists.
|
10 September 2014, 04:48 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: France
Posts: 114
|
I didn't hear anything about water resistance or anything like that
|
10 September 2014, 04:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Parker
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 337
|
I, for one, am happy my wrist is one place where I'm not getting digital data. My phone/computer/iPad have taken over my life. But when I look at my wrist, I don't see any tweets. I don't sift through pictures. I can't check email. And I really like that. |
10 September 2014, 04:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I don't think it looks attractive at all. I was actually pretty surprised at that part. I honestly thought that it would look super high end (for this type of product) and have some "Killer" feature. As of right now, and probably for a long time to come, it's mechanical watches for me aside from the G Shock days.
On another note, the Moto 360 looks 100 times nicer... |
10 September 2014, 05:02 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,761
|
I like it
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
10 September 2014, 05:03 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
|
|
10 September 2014, 05:04 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Randy
Location: USA
Watch: red 1680; 6542
Posts: 557
|
The rubber straps look exactly like those found on the Ikepod watches from 10 years ago.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 September 2014, 05:07 AM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,182
|
Looks great to work out in thats about all I would be interested in it for
|
10 September 2014, 05:09 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
I'll decide when it is actually out, I can see and touch it and learn more about it. Not on the day it is announced.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
10 September 2014, 05:10 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Perhaps I'll buy one for a couple of quid when the new one comes out in 6 months time.
__________________
..33 |
10 September 2014, 05:12 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, Swatch
Posts: 952
|
|
10 September 2014, 05:12 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,510
|
the apple watch doesn't get released to the public until spring of 2015 anyway.
But i am excited to try it out as a fitness tracker/fun watch. My rolex will never leave though =) |
10 September 2014, 05:16 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
|
I am still not sure about it. I am going to have to see it live to decide. I am getting the iPhone 6 for sure though.
|
10 September 2014, 05:18 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Parker
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 337
|
Curious how good an experience the watch is if you only wear it on occasion. If I'm Apple I build in features that get better the more you use it, making it so eventually the watch is an essential piece of technology. Fitbit is sort of like that- you don't want to leave it off your wrist for a few days because than you won't be accruing data/counting steps/calories, etc. If Apple has a lot of apps like that and the watch is more useful if worn every day, I wonder how many people will start wearing is exclusively.
|
10 September 2014, 05:22 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
if today's product releases are representative of aapl's forward ability to innovate, i don't think it's good news at all.
|
10 September 2014, 05:23 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 186
|
Naah...I would never take off my Rolex for an Apple Watch..truth be told, I didn't find it that nice looking or extra-special...
|
10 September 2014, 05:36 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I dont get the excitement myself....whats it going to do that i cant already get from an iphone and other similar products, eg fitness watch. To me its just another disposable gadget that i dont need or want.
|
10 September 2014, 05:36 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mexico City
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
|
|
10 September 2014, 05:41 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
|
iPhone 6 Yes - iWatch maybe for the gym - It will never replace my Rolex.
__________________
|
10 September 2014, 05:47 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Explorer II 16550
Posts: 1,401
|
Don't really get what a the fuss is over this Appke watch...
Really! Who cares??? People aren't going to dump their Rolex watches in favor of this disposable watch that will hold none of its value once the next version comes out. Those of us who know, understand and appriciate fine timepieces arent going anywhere. Anyone still have their very first cell phone or video game terminal? Of course all the techno geeks will want to be the first kids on their block to get an iwatch no matter the cost or how long the line up is. Rolex isn't going to fold up and disappear over this And those os us loyal to Rolex aren't going anywhere
__________________
There's a crown for every achievement A Watch Is Just A Watch A Rolex Is A Timepiece |
10 September 2014, 05:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
|
I do like it, nothing wrong with adding one to the collection, its not an all occasion watch, it is like the system 51 good novelty but it will never replace a true mechanical watch.
|
10 September 2014, 05:50 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
I will wear two watches why not Rolex and iwatch the iwatch will wear like a bracelet.
__________________
Always working...by choice |
10 September 2014, 05:52 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
I still have an iPhone 4...sooooooo I likely won't. I just purchased a new case for my phone too so I can't upgrade as I don't like wasting money.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
10 September 2014, 06:13 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
|
I really don't understand the comparison between a $9000 Rolex and a $350 Apple device. Totally different markets and no reason you can't own both. Stop drinking so much swiss kool-aid folks; this is comparing apples to oranges. A lot of people will buy them. That you can count on. So what if it's disposable tech - it sure doesn't stop Apple fanboys from buying new iPhones every year, or Android lovers for that matter.
|
10 September 2014, 06:19 AM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,514
|
Its just another variation of the watch. Its not or ever going to be "mechanical OR the tech watch."
Two different animals. This is much the same as a musician choosing Steinway or Production synthesizer. Both are useful and have their own applications. I suspect it will get non watch wearers back into watches. I want to play with the watch first before I make my mind up if it is viable to my lifestyle. The NEED for it to work with a iphone5 will probably kill it for me. The whole idea would be not to have to carry a phone as well.
__________________
|
10 September 2014, 06:25 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: James
Location: New Providence,NJ
Watch: Submariner 14060
Posts: 2,371
|
I like the fitness features of it as well as being able to play music when I work out (which I need to do more of..). Is it going to replace my Rolex or any of my other watches? No. It's another watch I'll wear from time to time and will probably be more of a 'tool' watch for when I work out.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.