ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gina Marie · 18 April 2015, 12:28 AM

I bought this bracelet off eBay from a seller in S. Korea. I got it for my 70 1675. I always liked the look of the jubilee on a GMT so I thought, why not. When I got the bracelet I noticed that it was not stamped with the model number. I inquired and the seller told me that the early models were not stamped 6251h....OK, I can see that. I checked the inet and that seemed to be plausible. The next thing I noticed was that the date was engraved and not stamped into the clasp.....is this correct? I thought Rolex date stamped during that period? Am I losing my mind? The item number on eBay is 251890840360

Thanks for you help!

TimeToGo · 18 April 2015, 07:20 AM

Looks like you have a bracelet with different sections.
My eyes are not the greatest so would like to see better pictures. On the last picture, the right side section is folded link and the left side is a "D link" type section.

crowncollection · 18 April 2015, 09:36 AM

Take a side on view, are both sides folded links

springer · 18 April 2015, 10:22 AM

The ebay auction clearly depicts a folded link Jubilee bracelet ( both sides of the clasp). In my opinion, the links look rather large. Also, the date engravings should be stamped on the clasp, not engraved. This style of bracelet is one of the types that are known to be counterfeited.

TimeToGo · 18 April 2015, 09:22 PM

On the Ebay auction, it is clearly a folded link bracelet..

This particular stamping has been discussed before as well..

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=346807

18 April 2015, 12:28 AM	#1
Gina Marie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: USA Baby! Posts: 1,068	1969 6251H is it real? I bought this bracelet off eBay from a seller in S. Korea. I got it for my 70 1675. I always liked the look of the jubilee on a GMT so I thought, why not. When I got the bracelet I noticed that it was not stamped with the model number. I inquired and the seller told me that the early models were not stamped 6251h....OK, I can see that. I checked the inet and that seemed to be plausible. The next thing I noticed was that the date was engraved and not stamped into the clasp.....is this correct? I thought Rolex date stamped during that period? Am I losing my mind? The item number on eBay is 251890840360 Thanks for you help! Attached Images

18 April 2015, 09:36 AM	#3
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Take a side on view, are both sides folded links __________________ watches many

18 April 2015, 10:22 AM	#4
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	The ebay auction clearly depicts a folded link Jubilee bracelet ( both sides of the clasp). In my opinion, the links look rather large. Also, the date engravings should be stamped on the clasp, not engraved. This style of bracelet is one of the types that are known to be counterfeited. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

18 April 2015, 07:20 AM	#2
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	Looks like you have a bracelet with different sections. My eyes are not the greatest so would like to see better pictures. On the last picture, the right side section is folded link and the left side is a "D link" type section.

18 April 2015, 09:22 PM	#5
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	On the Ebay auction, it is clearly a folded link bracelet.. This particular stamping has been discussed before as well.. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=346807

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)