ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

brandrea · 28 May 2015, 05:46 AM

Sub in this case. Now, I'll throw another idea in the mix. What if you were considering a PP5711 .....

captainnice · 28 May 2015, 06:32 AM

WG Sub

Lemarp · 28 May 2015, 06:39 AM

AP by an epic landslide.

MCO1 · 28 May 2015, 06:49 AM

I just like the Sub better, I might be tempted by a basic steel RO way down the road...might after every other watch I want is either in the stable or has been.

T01 · 28 May 2015, 07:40 AM

Sub, so versatile in WG!

AK797 · 28 May 2015, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abovedeck

Don't you just hate that? Life without gold is, well, just not life.

GB-man · 28 May 2015, 09:56 AM

Neither are on the radar for me but between the two sub all the way. Not an ROO chrono fan. I give diver its props but that's where it stops!

s14roller · 28 May 2015, 09:59 AM

AP. The construction and finishing is over Rolex by a significant margin...and I love my Rolexes! Maybe for the full YG Sub...

Shelby-villian · 28 May 2015, 10:32 AM

All I have to say about that ROO: Piggyback movement. oink oink

sea-dweller · 28 May 2015, 10:56 AM

Sub, for me.

Muzz · 28 May 2015, 01:19 PM

Tough call. With the Sub you will have a PM which is an amazing feeling. With the AP you will have a more sporty feeling watch with a very comfortable strap.

The - about the AP is the bezel is a scratch magnet and depending on your shirt cuff size can look a little sloppy. The model is relatively new so a used one will be hard to locate. If this is a decision you regret latter it will cost you.

The - about the Sub is the PCL will show swirls and if you use a MacBook will absolutely scratch, however the bezel is just awesome at staying pristine!!

Try them BOTH on and buy the one that sings to you!!!

Rogdogg · 28 May 2015, 01:38 PM

WG Sub for me. It is a watch that I dream about getting some day.
I do like that ROO though too. I like the colours and size of it a lot but in my mind there is no comparison to the WG Sub.

ash20 · 28 May 2015, 02:39 PM

WG Sub for sure. You won't be disappointed.

luvsub · 28 May 2015, 03:32 PM

Gold.

Bangel · 28 May 2015, 07:48 PM

WG Sub for me.

The angular appearance of APs don't really appeal to me.

aleeboy · 28 May 2015, 08:38 PM

I don't like the ROO reference. I'd go with the Sub easily here.

travisb · 28 May 2015, 11:06 PM

Sub. The Jumbo or ROC would make it a tougher choice for me.

beer · 28 May 2015, 11:26 PM

Personally I would choose the finishing/movement/uniqueness of that ROO over simply same object in gold but only by a sliver. Both are beautiful pieces and while I am new to the watch world a WG sub is hopefully 3rd on my list after I acquire a ROO and a Nautilus (some years!!)

View Poll Results: WG Sub or AP ROO?
WG Sub	109	82.58%
AP ROO	23	17.42%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

28 May 2015, 09:56 AM	#37
GB-man 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,355	Neither are on the radar for me but between the two sub all the way. Not an ROO chrono fan. I give diver its props but that's where it stops! __________________

28 May 2015, 10:56 AM	#40
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Sub, for me. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

28 May 2015, 01:38 PM	#42
Rogdogg 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Bangkok Posts: 6,124	WG Sub for me. It is a watch that I dream about getting some day. I do like that ROO though too. I like the colours and size of it a lot but in my mind there is no comparison to the WG Sub. __________________ Nil Satis Nisi Optimum

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

28 May 2015, 05:46 AM	#31
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,132	Sub in this case. Now, I'll throw another idea in the mix. What if you were considering a PP5711 .....

28 May 2015, 06:32 AM	#32
captainnice Banned Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Dennis Location: Aliso Viejo, Ca Watch: Timex Posts: 668	WG Sub

28 May 2015, 06:39 AM	#33
Lemarp "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Toronto Posts: 168	AP by an epic landslide.

28 May 2015, 06:49 AM	#34
MCO1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Missouri USA Watch: Daytona C white Posts: 2,248	I just like the Sub better, I might be tempted by a basic steel RO way down the road...might after every other watch I want is either in the stable or has been.

28 May 2015, 07:40 AM	#35
T01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: T Location: AZ, NV, CA Posts: 6,490	Sub, so versatile in WG!

28 May 2015, 09:59 AM	#38
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,257	AP. The construction and finishing is over Rolex by a significant margin...and I love my Rolexes! Maybe for the full YG Sub...

28 May 2015, 10:32 AM	#39
Shelby-villian "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: S *, C Watch: 18** Posts: 255	All I have to say about that ROO: Piggyback movement. oink oink

28 May 2015, 01:19 PM	#41
Muzz "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Steve Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN Watch: MP 18946 Posts: 7,292	Tough call. With the Sub you will have a PM which is an amazing feeling. With the AP you will have a more sporty feeling watch with a very comfortable strap. The - about the AP is the bezel is a scratch magnet and depending on your shirt cuff size can look a little sloppy. The model is relatively new so a used one will be hard to locate. If this is a decision you regret latter it will cost you. The - about the Sub is the PCL will show swirls and if you use a MacBook will absolutely scratch, however the bezel is just awesome at staying pristine!! Try them BOTH on and buy the one that sings to you!!!

28 May 2015, 02:39 PM	#43
ash20 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Abram Location: NorCal Watch: Rolex & Patek Posts: 513	WG Sub for sure. You won't be disappointed.

28 May 2015, 03:32 PM	#44
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,222	Gold.

28 May 2015, 07:48 PM	#45
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	WG Sub for me. The angular appearance of APs don't really appeal to me.

28 May 2015, 08:38 PM	#46
aleeboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Russel Location: N/A Watch: N/A Posts: 755	I don't like the ROO reference. I'd go with the Sub easily here.

28 May 2015, 11:06 PM	#47
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,496	Sub. The Jumbo or ROC would make it a tougher choice for me.

28 May 2015, 11:26 PM	#48
beer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: Watch Dealer atm! Watch: all Posts: 2,800	Personally I would choose the finishing/movement/uniqueness of that ROO over simply same object in gold but only by a sliver. Both are beautiful pieces and while I am new to the watch world a WG sub is hopefully 3rd on my list after I acquire a ROO and a Nautilus (some years!!)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)