The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 4 July 2015, 12:31 AM   #1
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Watch height -- my X factor

I have fallen in love with many a watch (happens at least once a day as I scroll through countless blogs and Flipboard watch pages) only to discover that the case height is unacceptably high (for me, this usually means greater than 13.0 mm).

For example, I really love the dial on the IWC Spitfire, but it's 15.5 mm high and looked pretty fat on my wrist.

Likewise, the Lange Dato Up/Down was my grail watch for awhile, until I tried it on and saw that it rides-high, at 13.1 mm (supposedly -- it felt like 15).

This for me has become the feature that is the "eliminator" of watches I dream about owning.
Attached Images
 
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 12:32 AM   #2
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Photo didn't make it, here it is
Attached Images
 
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 12:55 AM   #3
Srhdad
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 118
For that reason, and one other, I pretty much stopped owning chronographs. It's a useless complication (for me) and always adds thickness. I recently added a Breitling SOH in 46mm with a beautiful mesh bracelet. Fits perfectly under a dress shirt and wears smaller perhaps due to it being just barely 13mm thick. The chrono version is much thicker.
Srhdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 01:03 AM   #4
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Srhdad View Post
For that reason, and one other, I pretty much stopped owning chronographs. It's a useless complication (for me) and always adds thickness. I recently added a Breitling SOH in 46mm with a beautiful mesh bracelet. Fits perfectly under a dress shirt and wears smaller perhaps due to it being just barely 13mm thick. The chrono version is much thicker.
You are so right -- the Chrono complication is what seems to do it for sure. I want to add a chromo to my collection but haven't decided yet which one.

Also I agree with you on the 46mm point, which is that a large case (across) can look fine if the case height is reasonable. The IWC Portuguese comes to mind.
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 01:03 AM   #5
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,356
For me it's weight. I don't like watches that feel heavy. Preference is 175g and below but some watches are extremely well balanced and get a pass.
GB-man is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 01:06 AM   #6
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
For me it's weight. I don't like watches that feel heavy. Preference is 175g and below but some watches are extremely well balanced and get a pass.
That's interesting, I hadn't considered it.

I once tried on a Patek Phillipe world time, which is very modest in dimensions, but felt like a brick in terms of weight. Some people love that though.
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 01:36 AM   #7
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueHeron View Post
I once tried on a Patek Phillipe world time, which is very modest in dimensions, but felt like a brick in terms of weight. Some people love that though.
I would be one of them.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 05:15 AM   #8
mps354
2024 Pledge Member
 
mps354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,099
Height is a consideration for me, but I kind of like a bit more weight
mps354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 06:10 AM   #9
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,011
Love big thick chunky watches with substantial wrist presence...To each his own I guess as I write this with 44 RG AP on the wrist.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 06:14 AM   #10
adamlea
"TRF" Member
 
adamlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Great Plains
Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk
Posts: 1,190
I like a little substance and presence on a watch.
adamlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 06:27 AM   #11
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
14mm, maybe 14.5mm, is my cut-off point.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 06:46 AM   #12
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
I always pay attention to the watch height.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 09:14 AM   #13
jjnd08
"TRF" Member
 
jjnd08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
Always good to know what you like in watches. It really helps narrow down options when trying to decide.
__________________
----------------------
Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches
jjnd08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 10:39 AM   #14
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I used to like thicker watches, DSSD, Seawolf, etc but prefer 12mm and under now.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2015, 11:14 AM   #15
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
I also started to like slim watches and fallen out of favor with thick watches. Can't get over the "drum like" appearance on the wrist.

An obvious exception will be AP ROOs. They just look cooler being thick!
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2015, 04:10 AM   #16
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I would be one of them.
Yes, I loved the feel of it -- if you are going to spend $85k, it ought to weigh on your wrist a bit...
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2015, 04:31 AM   #17
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I would be one of them.
We know you are Mike

I have 2 things which turn me off and that is the height and weight, about the height I don't have a limit in the sense that some high watches are well proportioned and look ok, for example Panerai models in 44mm look ok, but the same height on a 40mm model and it suddenly looks way too thick, about the weight also it depends on a few factors, mainly how is the weight distributed, if a watch is 150gr on strap it's very different than a 150gr watch on bracelet
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 July 2015, 04:57 AM   #18
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
How about the flip side: the other day I tried on some Piaget slim models, and I didn't like them at all -- too insubstantial on the wrist!

I realize that this kind of thin is a technical marvel, but I don't like it on my wrist.
Attached Images
 
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.