The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 August 2015, 07:28 PM   #1
kentrojan1
"TRF" Member
 
kentrojan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: ken
Location: united kingdom
Watch: 124270
Posts: 806
Why I prefer Tudor over Rolex!

1. They are more affordable

2. Personally I think there watches have better styling and variety

3. There new lineup uses in house movement

4. What's not to like

I think Tudor are becoming a equal to Rolex, just like when Skoda used to be a brand people laugh at , now they are equal to VW if not better.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kentrojan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 07:36 PM   #2
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Can't disagree with your first point. I personally think their styling is hit and miss though. Tudor doesn't have the same long lasting models (yet) to be equal to Rolex IMO.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 07:38 PM   #3
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
I like that all the anxious enquiries about safety, damage, alignment, scratches and all the other worries and stigmas that Rolex watches generate here, just don't seem to come up with Tudor. I also appreciate the company heritage, which goes back much further than most people think, and the kind of 'anti-brand' self-confidence of the un-Rolex.

Attached Images
 
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 07:42 PM   #4
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
Can't disagree with your first point. I personally think their styling is hit and miss though. Tudor doesn't have the same long lasting models (yet) to be equal to Rolex IMO.
You're right, Tudor does make some ugly watches. Then so does Rolex.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 07:46 PM   #5
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
You're right, Tudor does make some ugly watches. Then so does Rolex.
True
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 07:55 PM   #6
Watch This
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: In your head
Watch: SS YMII
Posts: 1,619
Really? Ok. In a pinch, go sell your Tudor and see how enamoured you remain. Nothing wrong with Tudor but the comparison is flawed on many levels. To each his own.
Watch This is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 08:11 PM   #7
SALTY
"TRF" Member
 
SALTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
You're right, Tudor does make some ugly watches. Then so does Rolex.
As I've learned in life and as I tell my children, if you're not failing - then you are not trying.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man.
SALTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 08:14 PM   #8
kentrojan1
"TRF" Member
 
kentrojan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: ken
Location: united kingdom
Watch: 124270
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watch This View Post
Really? Ok. In a pinch, go sell your Tudor and see how enamoured you remain. Nothing wrong with Tudor but the comparison is flawed on many levels. To each his own.

This is my own personal opinion so I'm not speaking for everyone else!

But my cheapest Swiss watch is my Tudor ranger and I would say that it is my favourite too and the one I wear the most.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kentrojan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 09:40 PM   #9
carwash66
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
carwash66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex/Tudor
Posts: 1,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I like that all the anxious enquiries about safety, damage, alignment, scratches and all the other worries and stigmas that Rolex watches generate here, just don't seem to come up with Tudor. I also appreciate the company heritage, which goes back much further than most people think, and the kind of 'anti-brand' self-confidence of the un-Rolex.

I agree. As a hopeless dive watch addict, i do not plan to part with either of my TT subs. However, the BB is now my daily. Waiting for the Blue Pelagos.
Attached Images
 
carwash66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 09:41 PM   #10
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
They built well
Attached Images
 
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 09:52 PM   #11
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
I like that all the anxious enquiries about safety, damage, alignment, scratches and all the other worries and stigmas that Rolex watches generate here, just don't seem to come up with Tudor. I also appreciate the company heritage, which goes back much further than most people think, and the kind of 'anti-brand' self-confidence of the un-Rolex.

Very well said Adam, Tudor seems to be the wear it and don't worry about it brand.
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 09:53 PM   #12
GazDXB
"TRF" Member
 
GazDXB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Gary
Location: UAE & RSA
Watch: Sub,OP,Speedy,SMP
Posts: 3
In my home country, the UK, Skodas are still joked about as `VWs for thrifty (mean/tight) people` but the Czech company made some amazing cars in the 1950s. Err, Tudor's rebirth over past three years is amazing but I suspect the scratches, alignment etc issues you mention is because owners don't care quite as much. But I may be wrong.... (First post by long-time reader, New Rolex owner. Still want a BB)
GazDXB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:00 PM   #13
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
I really like both, these threads tend to end in tears.......
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:07 PM   #14
Matt748
"TRF" Member
 
Matt748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London - UK
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,249
When I first acquired a few Tudors, namely the Ranger, Black Bay and Pelagos I thought just as the OP in this thread.
The more I researched watches and the more I looked at them, the more my opinion changed towards Rolex.
I personally feel the quality of Rolex is second to none and have flipped 2 of the 3 Tudors for Rolex's in recent months.
Upgrades?? To me yes.
Pelagos is still here for now, but a 36mm Explorer is on the cards soon.
Flipping watches is a disease.
Matt748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:15 PM   #15
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
An unusual Tudor thread.

To post this Ken is almost trolling or at the very least looking for trouble.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:18 PM   #16
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
I have a great appreciation for both brands. Can't argue with Tudor's price point and quality for the money. Looking forward to picking up the new Pelagos this year. Rolex will always be my go to though.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:19 PM   #17
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Yes you could get a pelagos and black bay for the cost of a submariner ceramic and still save some cash. To each his own. I'd rather have the sub, although the pelagos is a very cool watch.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:47 PM   #18
Submariner2015
"TRF" Member
 
Submariner2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 325
IMO, so long as Rolex owns Tudor, Tudor will never surpass Rolex in Prestige--sales, on the other hand, may be different as Rolex will most obviously market Tudor as everyone's entry level luxury timepiece...quite frankly, the exclusivity and history of the Rolex brand is what helps to maintain its position in the market today.
Submariner2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:49 PM   #19
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
Glad you're enjoying your Tudor, but to me, they just don't compare to most Rolex on many levels.
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 10:52 PM   #20
Jari from Finland
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 394
There is nothing wrong to like Tudor. Having a Rolex on wrist doesn't exclude a Tudor and vice versa.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"I am interested in watches,
that's why I like them."
Jari from Finland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:00 PM   #21
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
If you like their prices, I do too, and their styles, I not nearly as much as Rolex, then it is the brand for you.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:02 PM   #22
Case61
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Case61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 1,145
I think this kind of "either/or" discussion is unproductive. I love my Big Block. I love my Rolexes. Different price points, different stylings, different market segmenting, different options all make for a wonderful world.

Case61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:17 PM   #23
Sub/GMT
"TRF" Member
 
Sub/GMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Europe
Watch: The White Gold Sub
Posts: 518
I have had the Tudor Blackbay. Beautiful watch that came in a very nice box that I prefer as much better quality then where my Rolex watches came in.



The new Pelagos is also very beautiful I think

__________________

Platinum DD 228206 Diamond Baguette Ice Blue Dial - Skydweller 326934 Black Dial Jubilee - Rosé Gold Yacht-Master 126655 Oysterflex - Smurf 116619LB - Sub 126613LB - Sub 124060LN - GMT-Master II 116710LN - DJ 126334 Blue......
Sub/GMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:21 PM   #24
GerardoG
Banned
 
GerardoG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
A very interesting thread....just as I had tried some. Beautiful indeed!
GerardoG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:29 PM   #25
Matt748
"TRF" Member
 
Matt748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London - UK
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,249
[QUOTE=Sub/GMT;6023536]I have had the Tudor Blackbay. Beautiful watch that came in a very nice box that I prefer as much better quality then where my Rolex watches came in.



I have to agree on the Box situation.
Tudor is better
Matt748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 August 2015, 11:44 PM   #26
Seaswirl
"TRF" Member
 
Seaswirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
Not crazy about some of Tudor's designs, but acknowledge that they are producing well made watches at attractive price points. I've thought about picking up a BB as a weekend watch and very well may still get one. I still prefer my Rolexes though.
Seaswirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2015, 12:05 AM   #27
soorg
"TRF" Member
 
soorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 79
No. Comparison. Ever.

Tudors look cheap.
soorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2015, 12:07 AM   #28
Sub/GMT
"TRF" Member
 
Sub/GMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Europe
Watch: The White Gold Sub
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaswirl View Post
Not crazy about some of Tudor's designs, but acknowledge that they are producing well made watches at attractive price points. I've thought about picking up a BB as a weekend watch and very well may still get one. I still prefer my Rolexes though.
I know want you mean. That is why I won't buy the beautiful Blue Pelagos as much as I love it, but I prefer my Blue Smurf over that one

Still, I think Tudors are indeed very nice priced watches with a fantastic historie, made of very good quality
__________________

Platinum DD 228206 Diamond Baguette Ice Blue Dial - Skydweller 326934 Black Dial Jubilee - Rosé Gold Yacht-Master 126655 Oysterflex - Smurf 116619LB - Sub 126613LB - Sub 124060LN - GMT-Master II 116710LN - DJ 126334 Blue......
Sub/GMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2015, 12:24 AM   #29
tomcorkery
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom Corkery
Location: westchester ny
Watch: ap ro 15400
Posts: 502
agree on your first point
tomcorkery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 August 2015, 12:32 AM   #30
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
[QUOTE=kentrojan1;6023207]1. They are more affordable

2. Personally I think there watches have better styling and variety

3. There new lineup uses in house movement

4. What's not to like

I think Tudor are becoming a equal to Rolex, just like when Skoda used to be a brand people laugh at , now they are equal to VW if not better.


It's obviously playing on your mind Ken, I guess you're still deciding whether or not to flip that Sub for 2 or 3 Tudor watches?
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.