|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 February 2016, 06:50 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: David
Location: NYC
Watch: Rolex SS Sub Date
Posts: 181
|
111, 312, or 320?
I'm still trying to make up my mind between these 3 models.
The 111 is what I originally had my eye on but after trying on some and shopping around I really like the 312 as well. Then started thinking, for a little more, I can get the seconds reset, power reserve indicator etc on the 320. I guess this is how Panerai gets you! Haha Just looking for a push in one direction or the other! Thanks. DL |
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 07:19 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
What is your wrist like? I like the 111 because it fits my wrist the best.
__________________
member#3242 |
|
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 08:38 AM
|
#3 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,308
|
I prefer the fit and thickness of the Bettarini case to the 1950s auto case, so, 111 for me.
|
|
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 09:04 AM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
As my friends above ^^ saying go for the Pam 111 very comfortable
|
|
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 10:18 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: john
Location: new jersey
Watch: Incoming
Posts: 564
|
X4! It's a great time to pick up these classic historic Pam's. 111 all day long.
|
|
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 10:30 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
The easy strap change button on the 312 comes in *mighty* handy...
|
|
|
|
|
20 February 2016, 10:46 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Hard to go wrong here, as they are all very appealing.
111 probably the safest bet, although I do like the 320. If you really want an auto, go 320 and enjoy the easy strap changes. Otherwise, stick with the 111.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 12:23 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Khalid
Location: Sugarland,TX
Watch: PAM 111
Posts: 165
|
The 320 has a few more features like you mentioned. I would vote for that.
I have a 312 now and love that too.
__________________
____________________________ Panerai 1316 Panerai 1223 |
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 01:57 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 69
|
Not a fan of complex PAMs; they're loved for their simplicity so 111 is it for me between these three choices.
|
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 02:18 AM
|
#10 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 02:40 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
111 for sure. Owned the 312 and much prefer the manual wind & case of the classic 111. ETA is also a key feature IMO.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 03:42 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
111 all day
|
|
|
|
|
22 February 2016, 04:25 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
312 for me, as I prefer a date function and don't have the need for a 2nd TZ.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
