The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 July 2008, 03:33 AM   #31
mgm
"TRF" Member
 
mgm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
When I say 40 mm is perfect, I'm talking UNIVERSAL....i.e. for just about any sized wrist!! Not tooooooo big and not ridiculously small - just right!!
__________________
Gregory
mgm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 03:41 AM   #32
sfrolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowKarter View Post
40 seems perfect now because you haven't found a 44 you like.

Once you find a 44 you love, then your 36 and 40 will look too small.
Larger watches can make a guy's wrist look feminine. Some guys can pull it off, but some can't.

My wrists are kind of small, so a 44 looks just plain silly on me.
sfrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 03:44 AM   #33
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfrolex View Post
Larger watches can make a guy's wrist look feminine. Some guys can pull it off, but some can't.

My wrists are kind of small, so a 44 looks just plain silly on me.
You'll appreciate knowing that three of the saleswomen at the Panerai/Cartier/Chopard AD in our city wear 44mm Panerais...and they look great.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 03:45 AM   #34
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
40mm is max for me. Even the 42mm PO seems too large for my wrists.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 04:11 AM   #35
sfrolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by boa2 View Post
You'll appreciate knowing that three of the saleswomen at the Panerai/Cartier/Chopard AD in our city wear 44mm Panerais...and they look great.
Admittedly a woman wearing something that makes her look more "masculine" can look better than a man that wears something that gives him a feminine look.

sfrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 04:13 AM   #36
mgm
"TRF" Member
 
mgm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by boa2 View Post
You'll appreciate knowing that three of the saleswomen at the Panerai/Cartier/Chopard AD in our city wear 44mm Panerais...and they look great.
That's an interesting observation and I can believe it, but what looks great on a woman has very little to do with what looks good on a man. It's not just a different aesthetic; the intention, the context and the meaning are different.
__________________
Gregory
mgm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 04:40 AM   #37
CPTL
"TRF" Member
 
CPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmh1013 View Post
I have never banged it into anything like I do with Breitlings, 44mm and up...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowKarter View Post
Once you find a 44 you love, then your 36 and 40 will look too small.
Something to be said about both of these statements.

When I first strapped on a Rolex (16610), I had a kind of Road House moment: "You know, I really thought you'd be bigger." It seemed small--at least, smaller than expected. Then, after wearing it for a few weeks, it felt like the perfect size. Now and then I'll strap on my Marathon SAR for a while, which is the same diameter as my Sub but has a giant milled steel bezel. It feels giant, and then when I go back to my Sub, it feels smaller than before.

It's all relative.

That being said, there is an objectively "better" size and weight--at least for each person. My Sub is almost too heavy for running, hiking, etc. It slides around on my wrist; the Explorer-II, or the Sub on a NATO, feels better when I'm being really active. I also agree that a bigger watch is more likely to get knocked on stuff. Seems like I was always banging my SAR on doorways, but almost never my Sub.
__________________

16610 Submariner Date; D Serial
16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial
16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial

And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial
CPTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 04:59 AM   #38
CPTL
"TRF" Member
 
CPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgm View Post
That's an interesting observation and I can believe it, but what looks great on a woman has very little to do with what looks good on a man. It's not just a different aesthetic; the intention, the context and the meaning are different.
Agree. My GF has tiny wrists and weighs about 105#. Today, she's wearing my Sub on a Bond NATO strap. It looks awesome on her, though the watch head is only slightly smaller than her hand.

That look would not work for me. It looks faddish: like some kind of oversized bracelet rather than a watch.
__________________

16610 Submariner Date; D Serial
16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial
16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial

And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial
CPTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 05:29 AM   #39
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfrolex View Post
Admittedly a woman wearing something that makes her look more "masculine" can look better than a man that wears something that gives him a feminine look.

Are we to understand that 100,000+ men a year end up looking like women because they wear a Panerai, a Big Bang, or a Royal Oak Offshore? And the new Deep Sea, too?

I've never worn a dress with this watch, but perhaps I should start. Hmmm...maybe Stallone is a cross-dresser?
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 07:52 AM   #40
moby33
"TRF" Member
 
moby33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
When I say 40 mm is perfect, I'm talking UNIVERSAL....i.e. for just about any sized wrist!! Not tooooooo big and not ridiculously small - just right!!
Good point...I agree.
moby33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 09:00 AM   #41
sfrolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by boa2 View Post
Are we to understand that 100,000+ men a year end up looking like women because they wear a Panerai, a Big Bang, or a Royal Oak Offshore? And the new Deep Sea, too?

I've never worn a dress with this watch, but perhaps I should start. Hmmm...maybe Stallone is a cross-dresser?
I didn't say "men look like women" when they put on a gargantuan watch. I tried to make a point that a woman can put on a man's dress shirt, or man's watch, and look good. Even GQ has photo spreads of women wearing men's suits. But we never see a man wearing a woman's clothes in GQ (did you see how The Joker looked in that nurse's uniform in The Dark Knight)?

Anyway, I think I've made my point, and I don't want this thread to spiral out of control After all you were kind enough to tell me more about Shapur.

By the way, the Panerai looks good on you.
sfrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 09:21 AM   #42
the186element
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: usa
Watch: GMTII PEPSI
Posts: 385
Who is everybody kidding.If ROLEX made the submariner
in a 44mm, 46mm 48mm it would probably be one of
hottest out there.As you see Rolex is starting to get
alittle larger with the DD.Only time will tell.I'm thinking
large.

PS I'm on the list for the new DD. Hopefully sooner than later.

THE186ELEMENT.
the186element is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 09:40 AM   #43
vegaseddie
"TRF" Member
 
vegaseddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 186
Quite the debate here. I have been a Rolex person for over 20 years and I guess I am also a traditionalist. Although there is a place in the market for high end big watches, I hope Rolex does not jump into that market. In my opinion Rolex is about tradition and slow evolution of their watches. I wonder if generally this is a younger vs older person issue meaning younger wants watches that are larger and currently more fashionable and older likes traditional models and sizes.
__________________
"There are only two types of people in this world, those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't". Bob Wiley

16030A, 16013, 116520
vegaseddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 10:17 AM   #44
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfrolex View Post
I didn't say "men look like women" when they put on a gargantuan watch. I tried to make a point that a woman can put on a man's dress shirt, or man's watch, and look good. Even GQ has photo spreads of women wearing men's suits. But we never see a man wearing a woman's clothes in GQ (did you see how The Joker looked in that nurse's uniform in The Dark Knight)?

Anyway, I think I've made my point, and I don't want this thread to spiral out of control After all you were kind enough to tell me more about Shapur.

By the way, the Panerai looks good on you.
No worries. I probably just misunderstood you before, but I get what you're saying.

Thanks a lot re: the Panerai. And by the way, we really need to organize a SF gathering, because there are a lot of us NorCal folks on this site.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 12:13 PM   #45
Road Warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Road Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: NC
Watch: Any Rolex
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
i also think it looks ridiculous
x2!!!
__________________
Wearing a Rolex is perpetual bliss!
Road Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 01:43 PM   #46
lorsban
"TRF" Member
 
lorsban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
It's a fashion thing. Some feel they have to look the part and that means wearing ridiculously large watches.

I've got watches ranging from 42-34mm and I think they all look good. It depends on the design really. For instance, I wouldn't want a chronograph on a 34mm case, it would look too busy and I don't want my AK that just tells the time on anything larger than 36mm - it'll look to sparse. And if we're talking diver's watches (which have thicker cases) I think it'll look weird if it was in a 36mm case that was really thick.

Personally though, I wouldn't touch anything under 34mm and over 44mm. I like variety but weird is weird.
lorsban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2008, 03:52 PM   #47
ashu2289
"TRF" Member
 
ashu2289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdelsol View Post
Maybe we can blame this guy:
:lol :
__________________


Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX
116520 SS Daytona White Dial
116520 SS Daytona Black Dial
116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial
16600 Sea-Dweller
16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel
16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial
116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller
ashu2289 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 06:53 AM   #48
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
Fashion comes and goes. That's the beauty of life.
Classic style will always be fashionable.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best.
f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 06:55 AM   #49
pwrslider
"TRF" Member
 
pwrslider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by boa2 View Post
No worries. I probably just misunderstood you before, but I get what you're saying.

Thanks a lot re: the Panerai. And by the way, we really need to organize a SF gathering, because there are a lot of us NorCal folks on this site.
Here Here....or there there...just let me know Where!
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95)
Rolex SS GMT IIc (08)
Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..)
Rolex Explorer II Blk (91)
Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07)
Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03)
pwrslider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 06:56 AM   #50
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
Yes, 40 MM is the maximum for me. I prefer something smaller, like a 36 MM.
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 06:56 AM   #51
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2008, 07:06 AM   #52
superdelsol
"TRF" Member
 
superdelsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
I just picked up this Zodiac V-Wolf 44mm. This will be the biggest watch I own. I don't think I'll mind the size, but it weights like half a pound! I haven't had it sized yet, but I hope the weight doesn't cause it to migrate too much on my wrist.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986
superdelsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.