ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 July 2008, 01:08 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
|
29 July 2008, 01:46 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
|
Quote:
Jim, a chimney pot! You remembered, you sweetheart! |
|
29 July 2008, 07:43 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 9,407
|
Lisa
I'm still on the lookout!!!!!!!! J |
29 July 2008, 10:45 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Michael
Location: Melb, Australia
Watch: SS GMTIIC
Posts: 1,350
|
Quote:
Very good advice there.............I agree. |
|
30 July 2008, 01:39 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
Heh - I remember when folks would get mad at you for calling unsolicited mass-email SPAM. Oh well. Kind of like the misuse of hacker/cracker... everyone got tired of making the correction. In the old days, SPAM -only- referred to unsolicited mass Usenet postings.
Anyway, the corporate space has had this issue solved for years. Network-based anti-spam services like MessageLabs have been the gold standard for a long time since they save the transit capacity. The unwanted messages never traverse the link to the corp email server. MessageLabs is listed as the MX record for the zones they provide service to. They scrub the inbound mail and relay only the valid messages to the corp email server(s). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.