The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 August 2016, 06:45 AM   #1
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Do USA Police have Lay Visitors?

I just watched a BBC documentary on the NYPD, do US police have a lay visitor system like we do in the UK (https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q107.htm), whereby approved members of the public can turn up unannounced at a police station to speak with a detained person to check on their welfare?

Curious how our systems compare and know we have some US cops on here.

TIA
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2016, 09:09 AM   #2
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Welfare of the Police or . . . ?

Website doesn't open here . . .

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2016, 10:38 AM   #3
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
Anyone incarcerated (with a few exceptions) can have visitors during posted hours.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2016, 10:41 AM   #4
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
From the website

Independent Custody Visitors (ICVs) were formerly known as lay visitors. To become an ICV you need to apply to your local police and crime commissioner. You need to be aged over 18 and not working for the police service or in the criminal justice system or in any role where a conflict of interest may arise i.e. a solicitor. You also need a good command of the English language (all paperwork in cell areas is written in English). If you are successful you will be given the relevant training for the role. ICVs are volunteers but do get reimbursed for their expenses.

The principal role of the ICV is to visit detained persons in police custody and speak to them about the treatment they are receiving from the police and to check that they have had all their rights and entitlements. The detained person is under no obligation to speak to ICVs, it is purely a personal choice. The ICV can also check that person's custody record with his or her permission.

As they have a general responsibility to check the police are doing their work properly, they can do a check of all areas of the custody suite, ask questions and look at the records relating to the activities in the suite.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2016, 06:59 PM   #5
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Thank you Abdullah.

The question was whether there is a system in place for someone who has been authorised to turn up, unannounced, and check on the welfare of a person in custody.

Not on the welfare of the police officers, not a visitor who is a friend or relative of the detained person.

Here we have a group of independent people, not connected to law enforcement or the law in anyway, who can turn up and insist on seeing a detained person to check on their welfare.

I wondered if the same system existed Stateside.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 01:09 AM   #6
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckFinlay View Post
Thank you Abdullah.

The question was whether there is a system in place for someone who has been authorised to turn up, unannounced, and check on the welfare of a person in custody.

Not on the welfare of the police officers, not a visitor who is a friend or relative of the detained person.

Here we have a group of independent people, not connected to law enforcement or the law in anyway, who can turn up and insist on seeing a detained person to check on their welfare.

I wondered if the same system existed Stateside.
Didn't know it existed and that it was allowed

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 01:30 AM   #7
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Does in the UK, just wondering if similar does in the US.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 03:32 AM   #8
James K
"TRF" Member
 
James K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 694
No, there isn't in exactly that same manner. There's ways to see people in custody but it's complicated to explain and varies because of several different components surrounding the arrest.
James K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 04:05 AM   #9
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Thank you. I have been looking into this and it does seem to be unique to the UK. I've also been looking at training comparisons, which also show a marked difference.

Thanks for the input, some eye opening info.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 04:18 AM   #10
ecdc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: US
Posts: 502
In short, no. Most jails/prisons have visiting hours a couple times per week, but the inmate generally needs to put the visitor on an "approved visitor" list. The inmate's lawyer can usually show up almost anytime to visit. I'm not aware of anything in the US along the lines of the independent civilian program you describe. I'm a lawyer who's done a whole lot of criminal defense, so this has been my experience.
ecdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 04:34 AM   #11
seand442
"TRF" Member
 
seand442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116610
Posts: 3,455
Nothing like that I am aware of. Visitation typically depends on the jurisdiction.
__________________
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE.
seand442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 07:16 PM   #12
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Thank you all those that answered. Interesting differences arising the more research I do.

Hopefully some more of the cops onboard will see and respond as lots of things Stateside seem to be localised rules/procedures/laws.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 08:30 PM   #13
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckFinlay View Post
Thank you all those that answered. Interesting differences arising the more research I do.

Hopefully some more of the cops onboard will see and respond as lots of things Stateside seem to be localised rules/procedures/laws.
When I was a deputy in the 90's our department was accredited, which meant we had to follow standardized guidelines. But the jail operation was contracted to a private firm (CCA) who had their own standards.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 09:52 PM   #14
68camaro
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA!
Posts: 862
In 2013 there were over 57,000 assualts on police officrers in the US, over 15,000 had injuries. In 2016 firearm murders of police officers is up 62%.

Has anyone heard these statistics on their nightly news? Sorry, but my thoughts are with those who put these lives on the line to protect us not on those in custody?

http://www.nleomf.org/facts/officer-.../daifacts.html
68camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 11:22 PM   #15
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68camaro View Post
In 2013 there were over 57,000 assualts on police officrers in the US, over 15,000 had injuries. In 2016 firearm murders of police officers is up 62%.

Has anyone heard these statistics on their nightly news? Sorry, but my thoughts are with those who put these lives on the line to protect us not on those in custody?

http://www.nleomf.org/facts/officer-.../daifacts.html
Nobody attacked the police in this thread. Why the backblast?

If you run a jail you have to provide the prisoners all of the rights and services mandated by the law. It looks like the UK system has a formal process, promoted by law enforcement, for third party reviews of their jails to ensure they are operated in accordance with the law. I don't see how that undermines the police in any way.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 11:37 PM   #16
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
State law generally governs people who are detained and/or incarcerated locally. Overarching Federal Law governs the rights of prisoners - e.g. Constitutional Rights. - as well as the Federal Prison System. In our locale, the local police generally perform initial booking into a Local/City lock-up and then hand over responsibility to the Sheriff's Dept who manage the actual prisons for long-term incarceration.

Our nation differs from those with a central government that has a single point of prison management.

I don't see the real point of debating this further as it borders on political system differences and that never seems to end well. England has a system that is different from Russia - may as well debate that - what works for them is up to them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 August 2016, 11:45 PM   #17
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
State law generally governs people who are detained and/or incarcerated locally. Overarching Federal Law governs the rights of prisoners - e.g. Constitutional Rights. - as well as the Federal Prison System. In our locale, the local police generally perform initial booking into a Local/City lock-up and then hand over responsibility to the Sheriff's Dept who manage the actual prisons for long-term incarceration.

Our nation differs from those with a central government that has a single point of prison management.

I don't see the real point of debating this further as it borders on political system differences and that never seems to end well. England has a system that is different from Russia - may as well debate that - what works for them is up to them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Our nation also allows prisoners to sue their captors.

A volunteer system would never work in the US. The auditors would need to be qualified and certified so they could be subject matter experts in all the resulting lawsuits. It would be outrageously expensive to operate that kind of third party audit process here.

A nice idea in principal, but completely impractical in the US IMO.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 August 2016, 01:10 AM   #18
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Thanks Abdullah for your input, I don't want it to decline into anything inappropriate or political, it is a shame that anyone would think it needs to, or that discussion equals criticism.

Having spent 30 years as a police and civilian employee of the Metropolitan Police in the UK, it's a subject I find interesting and I saw this as a place I could ask colleagues, serving or ex, from overseas.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2016, 02:51 PM   #19
arinsd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: So. Cal
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 835
There are NGOs that can and do check on the welfare of inmates. Usually the visit is pre-planned. There is a large system of checks and balances... That's not to say they work perfectly but they are in place. Also there are third party auditors that come in and check prisons and detention centers.

BTW... I have 10 years in LE and have worked at both federal, state, local prisons. I haven seen audits, NGOs, and the ACLU tour and make changes to programs and policy.
arinsd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 August 2016, 02:57 PM   #20
Relyt
"TRF" Member
 
Relyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Tye
Location: Eastern US
Watch: Rolex Explorer ii
Posts: 1,464
Yes and no. Can someone walk in the prison and demand to speak with "prisoner 'x'" at any time? No. However there are billions (slight exaggeration) of groups and "civil rights groups," that do tour, check etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
~NEVER GIVE UP!

2005 Explorer ii 16570T
Relyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 August 2016, 11:51 PM   #21
ChuckFinlay
"TRF" Member
 
ChuckFinlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Watch: 116719BLRO
Posts: 496
Thanks again fellas.
ChuckFinlay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.