The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 20 October 2016, 03:31 AM   #31
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
I was trying to be subtle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oyster Al View Post
Yeah i bet you like "silver-tone metals"!!
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 03:39 AM   #32
docmarioce
"TRF" Member
 
docmarioce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
SS is lighter and more durable than PM. Also less flashy. I like YG but is very heavy for my taste. I'd like to have a YG Sub in the future but I know is going to have very little wrist time.
__________________
______________________________________________
Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic!
Omega Seamaster Chrono
docmarioce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 03:41 AM   #33
SemperFi
"TRF" Member
 
SemperFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
First off let me say that I could not afford a PM watch. Coincidentally, and the good news part, is that I have no desire to own a PM watch. The metal is softer than SS, and as OCD as I am, it just wouldn't do.
I am ecstatic to own the two watches I have (Explorer and Black Bay) with my mind set on a future DJ in SS. The only concession I'll make is to possibly go for the fluted bezel which I know is white gold.
__________________
Rolex Submariner
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra
Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue
Tudor Ranger 79910
Nomos Club Datum 733
Nomos Metro 38
Stowa Flieger Classic 40

* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons *
SemperFi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 03:54 AM   #34
Juantxo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
If it's good for cranioplasty, it's good for my watch.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg JNeurosciRuralPract_2011_2_2_162_83584_f5.jpg (71.6 KB, 195 views)
File Type: jpg 2433820_orig.jpg (44.4 KB, 191 views)
Juantxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 04:03 AM   #35
Sublover2166
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
I was trying to be subtle.
Damascus steel holds quite an edge also, and is unique.
Sublover2166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 04:52 AM   #36
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
I find my 25 yr or so YG DayDate doesn't show wear like my newer SS Rolex watches do.

There are much harder steels, like nickel steel, but they are extremely difficult to machine. Most jewelers would not be able to polish them.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 04:55 AM   #37
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
I'm sure if a PM watch was the same price, most people would go for PM... that being said you must factor cost in to the equation here. If I can have three watches for the price of one, with all things being the same but the metal, I'm going for the cheaper one. SS offers you that!
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 04:57 AM   #38
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
id really like gold , im just practicing with stainless as a dry run.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:45 AM   #39
DPE
"TRF" Member
 
DPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: uk
Posts: 1,050
Why Not ?
DPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:48 AM   #40
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Sure it does, I don't particularly like dress watches with leather straps on traditional hook lugs but I do like the colour, heft and feel of PM so sports PMs are the obvious choice for me and many here, just as if I had to buy a dress watch for certain occasions I would be inclined to an SS one to keep the price down.
What I said was that it doesn't make sense to me. Having read your post, it still doesn't. What we think is really up to us, isn't it?
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:50 AM   #41
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,959
Why stainless steel

It's more economical for the buyer. And less costly if you need to replace any parts like bezel, bracelet, clasp, caseback, crown or midcase.

One day we may all be wearing bronze - or plated brass- but for now it's SS as the top metal choice in worldwide watch sales (by volume, that is)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 05:52 AM   #42
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quailhunter View Post
I find my 25 yr or so YG DayDate doesn't show wear like my newer SS Rolex watches do.
Yellow gold is known to be harder than steel.
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:13 AM   #43
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
Yellow gold is known to be harder than steel.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:21 AM   #44
lukey77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: london
Posts: 226
Why stainless steel

For me the beauty of the watch is the craftsmanship of the movement, the engineering and design.
Therefore the pm case is merely extra cost with little benefit. In fact if you consider a watch should be worn.. There's dis-benefit to a pm, as it's far less practical.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lukey77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:21 AM   #45
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
"Yellow gold is known to be harder than steel."

That doesn't sound right, but I think my observation doesn't have anything to do with hardness. I think my YG DayDate just never has shown scratches like the highly polished areas of my SS watches.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:26 AM   #46
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
What I said was that it doesn't make sense to me. Having read your post, it still doesn't. What we think is really up to us, isn't it?
My post makes perfect sense, I suspect even to you, but yes you think as you want.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:42 AM   #47
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Always thought gold = gaudy.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:45 AM   #48
mmbiker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub
Posts: 588
Because I can afford SS where as WG and is close enough ;)

Also, SS subc holds value better than WG subc. But let's not kid myself, I can't afford a WG


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mmbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:51 AM   #49
JapRs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: RolexPatek
Posts: 664
PM is another world...but you need to have it so you can appreciate it
JapRs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 06:54 AM   #50
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
No offense to anyone but I find that the opinions on the issues of Rolex PM are overblown by those with no direct/meaningful experience. Or if you're going to beat up a PM watch, odds are good that a SS watch will be just as beat up. As someone who owns a lot of PM (as well as SS), I treat all my watches the same and I see very little difference in wear between them.

PS: Judging by the volume of TRF threads on scratches and dings to SS watches, you'd think SS was even more delicate than gold.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 07:36 AM   #51
RHJ
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
RHJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: here
Watch: 214270 Mk1
Posts: 924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
Yellow gold is known to be harder than steel.
Not at all, and 18ct still softer...
__________________
here to learn
RHJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 07:41 AM   #52
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHJ View Post
Not at all, and 18ct still softer...
Actually 18kt gold is harder than pure gold due to the alloys mixed in.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 07:54 AM   #53
Hollister
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: 114300
Posts: 1,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
My post makes perfect sense, I suspect even to you, but yes you think as you want.
Gee, thanks. I chose PP over Rolex PM. Same movement in a steel Rolex as PM (new and allegedly temperamental DD 40 aside), better movement in a Patek.

My remark about YG being harder than steel might possibly have been ironic (pun intended).
Hollister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 08:08 AM   #54
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
It's waterproof. It's a miraculous material. I bet the Romans would have loved the stuff, particularly fancy super stuff like S30V and VG-10. I won't give reasons why as it's not allowed. To those who dig ;)
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 08:52 AM   #55
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollister View Post
... I chose PP over Rolex PM. Same movement in a steel Rolex as PM... better movement in a Patek.
Rolex isn't the only company that reuses movements in different material cases. It's done industry wide. The PP 324 movement can be found in a number of models from the "entry" level up to a complicated model (as a base). "Better" is relative. It could be argued that Rolex's big/robust/simple movements are best for an active owner.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 09:11 AM   #56
Sublover2166
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
No offense to anyone but I find that the opinions on the issues of Rolex PM are overblown by those with no direct/meaningful experience. Or if you're going to beat up a PM watch, odds are good that a SS watch will be just as beat up. As someone who owns a lot of PM (as well as SS), I treat all my watches the same and I see very little difference in wear between them.

PS: Judging by the volume of TRF threads on scratches and dings to SS watches, you'd think SS was even more delicate than gold.
There are a whole lot more folks owning SS watches vs. Gold or Plat
If we all had the shekels to buy PM like some here, there would be much more PM watch owners.
Sublover2166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 09:19 AM   #57
TickTockChuck
"TRF" Member
 
TickTockChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,270
Stainless steel is the traditional material for professional "tool" watches for corrosion resistance and durability, plus it can be polished or brushed nicely. I like WG too and it feels great to strap on a smurf Sub or BLRO GMT II, but the premium is not easily justified IMHO. So stainless will be the dominant material. Cheers!
TickTockChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 10:03 AM   #58
Chute
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Austin
Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO
Posts: 1,559
To me, stainless steel fits more with my adoration for the tool purpose of a watch. PM's make a watch a piece of jewelry.
Also, I can't afford the gold or platinum pieces anyway.
If I did have the money and a watch like the BLRO stayed available in only WG, I could see buying one.
Chute is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 12:12 PM   #59
RGAmos
"TRF" Member
 
RGAmos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 194
Stainless steel is used primarily for its corrosion resistance. Rolex changed from 316 ss to 904l ss simply for enhanced corrosion resistance.
RGAmos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2016, 04:39 PM   #60
Utomow
"TRF" Member
 
Utomow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Jakarta
Watch: 116610LN, 126334
Posts: 338
Cause simplicity is always the best
Utomow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
steel , survey


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.