The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 November 2016, 11:48 AM   #1
Shender
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Rolex 116613LB for a 20 year old

I was wondering what people's thoughts were for a 20 year old wearing the 116613lb. Would it be too flashy for someone that young? Would it be okay? Would the 116622 be more suited for someone of that age. Any thoughts are appreciated. ✌️️


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 11:55 AM   #2
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
If you like it buy it. 116613lb screams 50 year old guy with a cigar to me. But who the hell cares what I think.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 11:56 AM   #3
Afghanvet
"TRF" Member
 
Afghanvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Virginia
Watch: Subs, SD4K
Posts: 2,272
Not my boy... until he can get one on his own.
__________________
Subaholics Anonymous

Afghanvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 11:58 AM   #4
yjfang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
I personally think the 116613 would be too flashy for a 20 year old. All kinds of judgmental thoughts come to mind if I were to see that.

I think a cool Rolex for a 20 year old would be a hand me down DJ or 5 digit Explorer II.
yjfang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 11:59 AM   #5
Jack Bauer
"TRF" Member
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: CTU
Posts: 118
20 years old? I'd go with a Tag and save the rest.
Jack Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:01 PM   #6
sechsgang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,448
It's definitely not a young look...of the TT line, the GMT master II is a little more hip so to speak and maybe something you should check out if TT is really what you're after. Otherwise, stick with one of the classic SS sport watches and you'll be totally set...or if you REALLY want blue and can spend, go for a smurf.
sechsgang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:08 PM   #7
hambone1983
2024 Pledge Member
 
hambone1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,302
I'm with those who say he can have it when he can buy it with his own money. Until then, the kind of Rolexes my sons will have are the ones that say Seiko on the dial.
hambone1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:08 PM   #8
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
if it were my boy --- ya, um, nope. wearing more than the per capita GDP of a developing nation on his wrist at 20 is just a bit much.

but if you're rich and your kid has a butler and an ex-Mossad body guard on call, sure, why not... gotta keep up appearances i guess.

my ¢2

19

20
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:12 PM   #9
sechsgang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,448
There is a lot of animosity here about this kind of stuff...if he can have it, be it with his own money or as a gift, what's the issue? As long as there is appreciation, let him have fun!
sechsgang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:17 PM   #10
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Personally ? I may get criticized here but ...

When I was 20 I had a look a like
Bluesy Sub made by Daniel Mink cause I
Couldn't afford the real deal then ...
So yeah if you like it , you can buy and afford it ...
then go for it !!!

I was 30 when I got my first 5 digit Blue Sub TT 16613LB.
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:20 PM   #11
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Not a chance
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:24 PM   #12
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I have the full gold but at 20 I'd go for the YM blue dial, lovely watch.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:27 PM   #13
CLTRolex
"TRF" Member
 
CLTRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Charlotte/London
Watch: Multiple
Posts: 889
Get a different watch like a tag
__________________
♕ Daytona - 116506
♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR
♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680
♕ Daytona - 116520
♕ Explorer II - 16570
CLTRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:37 PM   #14
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
I wore a 16613 when I was 20. My Dad told me I was nuts. Much like other post here, not in a bad way, but in a good way...as in you are on your own on this one.
I worked hard and saved up for it. I wore it daily for years.
That was the 80's though and it seems more people wore YG in those days.
If you like it and can afford it, why would you care what others think.
__________________
Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today?
Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score.
Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers?
Ty: By height.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:41 PM   #15
hambone1983
2024 Pledge Member
 
hambone1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,302
I didn't intend to sound judgmental. The OP asked our thoughts & several had a similar thought to share. I would just go a different way with it, doesn't make anyone right or wrong.
hambone1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 12:47 PM   #16
Jsan20
"TRF" Member
 
Jsan20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Michigan
Watch: 116613LB
Posts: 861
Get it and enjoy it. Life is too short to worry about what people think.
Jsan20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 01:07 PM   #17
Eva123
"TRF" Member
 
Eva123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
If you are buying this Rolex from money that your earned - go for it as it would symbolize your achievement. However, if you are buying it from your parent's money, then you would give wrong impression to people.

I like people who are trying to reach their own targets, work hard to achieve their goals despite the fact that they come from really rich families. However, rich kids (especcialy Russian, Oriental) who are spending their parent's money on luxury things and despise other people really give wrong impression to society.
Eva123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 02:55 PM   #18
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
If you like the way it looks, that's all that matters. Don't buy or pass on a watch cause you're worried what others may think. 99% of the world won't even notice in reality.
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 03:18 PM   #19
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
I purchased my first TT Sub at age 23/24 can't exactly remember. I wore it fine but I was a long way away from an average 20 year old.

If it is a gift for a 20 year old then I would say negative on that.
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 03:38 PM   #20
Chronoseeker
"TRF" Member
 
Chronoseeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana, USA
Watch: Milgauss 116400GV
Posts: 353
I have 3 sons, my oldest being 30 and it so happens that watches are just not their "thing". A Rolex is not so much a right of passage but a sign to yourself and others that you have reached a certain place in life. A place of respect for ones self or respect others show the recipient. I would suggest thinking about the young man's likes and appreciations in life such as sports, hobbies, interests and buy a watch that compliments his lifestyle. A Tag Heuer, Tissot, Seiko etc. Bulova's Moonwatch homage to the Omega Speed master is a lovely timepiece in the $400.00 range. Ask yourself, is the young man a watch guy or is he new to watches ? What is his appreciation level for watches at all ? If you must go Rolex, I suggest a pre-owned piece perhaps in your AD's case ? Ask their advice as well. I wish you success in your search, there is a lot of passion involved in this seemingly simple question !
Chronoseeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 03:43 PM   #21
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
Bluesy is a great piece even on a younger individual
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 04:37 PM   #22
Shender
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 44
Ah forgot to mention that he will be paying it himself, despite being 20, he does have a career in one of the big banks here in Sydney, so I'm very proud of him. He came to me asking for advice as he is a big watch person much like myself, and was interested in the 116613LB because I mentioned to him I was thinking of picking one up myself. I actually suggested he looked at the 116622 in blue or rhodium dial, as I find that that looks much better on someone like him, so I just wanted more opinions on the matter
Shender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 04:43 PM   #23
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,314
If you can afford it get it
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 06:02 PM   #24
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
Blnr much more youthful

Blnr? Much nicer in my opinion
Attached Images
 
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 06:11 PM   #25
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
There's only one person on this thread who knows anything at all about this 20 year old and that's the OP.

Personally, I don't think that watches fall into young and old categories.

I think traditional and trendy are two categories that make more sense.

Maybe we can add, refined and gaudy to that list.

Anyway, I think Jack Bauer is on to something with TAG.

In that age group, TAG is the cat's pajamas.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 07:17 PM   #26
Evad3
"TRF" Member
 
Evad3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Dave
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Watch: 14060m/216570
Posts: 773
116613 is fine for a 20 year old IMO
__________________
Current: NOS 14060m , 216570 Polar
Previous: 116710BLNR, 114060, 2x NOS 14060m
Evad3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 08:02 PM   #27
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
If you have the means to do it then do it. Who cares what everyone else thinks.

I was rocking a 116613LB at 28. Everyone said Rolex is an old mans watch blah blah. Now I have 5 of them at age 31. I buy them for me not anyone else.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 08:37 PM   #28
RKTudor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Rick
Location: Emmaus, PA
Watch: Tudor 79090 blue
Posts: 298
Compound interest. Knowing so little I can't really give a well informed opinion, but compound interest is the first thing that comes to mind. Buy a used sub, save $5,000 and invest it! On the other hand, maybe your family is richer than sin and this whole conversation is irrelevant! In that case, do what you want! Post pics when you buy!
RKTudor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 08:44 PM   #29
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shender View Post
I was wondering what people's thoughts were for a 20 year old wearing the 116613lb. Would it be too flashy for someone that young? Would it be okay? Would the 116622 be more suited for someone of that age. Any thoughts are appreciated. ✌️️

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A friend of mine was given a 16613LB as a 21 birthday present (a good few years ago now) and it looked great on him at 21. Its not the watch, its the person wearing it that determines whether it works or not.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2016, 08:53 PM   #30
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
TBH a 116613LB looks good on anyone. :) :)
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.