ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

1William · 29 November 2016, 10:08 PM

I had both for awhile and eventually moved the DSSD in favor of the Sub-C ND. Thought that the sub was more wearable for me and the money out of the flip helped me get another watch that I wanted.

brandrea · 29 November 2016, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

D-blue and 114060? sure!

absolutely

OmegaJJH · 29 November 2016, 10:28 PM

For my budget they are too similar for me.

If I had unlimited funds, hell yeah i'd have both.

Golflife2 · 30 November 2016, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ritch99

No issues with owning both. I own for me not anyone else. Each piece I own brings me its own unique feeling when I wear it. Here are some of my 6 digit divers. Cheers!
Attachment 802040

Attachment 802041

Wow great diver collection!

Golflife2 · 30 November 2016, 12:12 AM

Thanks for all the feed back guys!!

AK797 · 30 November 2016, 12:30 AM

DB or LVc sure, otherwise too similar.

WAK4 · 30 November 2016, 12:35 AM

No, but that's because I've had a resistance to a black Sub Date ever since I started collecting.

Now, the SD and a Deep Sea? Yup, been there done that.

GradyPhilpott · 30 November 2016, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amg55

Not me. It'd be almost like buying two identical suits.

Yeah, but one would be a really big suit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuoiRr6hLjg

r8t3d_M · 30 November 2016, 03:39 AM

I would definitely own both..if I had the money for it..

beshannon · 30 November 2016, 03:56 AM

No far too similar and the DSSD does not fit on my wrist

sea-dweller · 30 November 2016, 04:06 AM

Too similar for me.

watchwatcher · 30 November 2016, 04:08 AM

Absolutely, although I guess it would depend on how many watches were in the collection for me...as I like a little variety. But the diver bezel is one of the most useful functions on a sports watch, IMO.

Actually, I'm kind of contemplating adding a DSSD in with two subs even as we speak. Decisions, decisions...

faz · 30 November 2016, 04:17 AM

There are way too many beautiful watches out there that I would like to own and spend my money on. I won't own two (or in some cases as pictured above three or more) very similar looking watches from the same brand.

But at the end of the day, owning a watch is a very personal thing, and if one enjoys the subtle differences (even if no one else in the world would see or appreciate those differences) then one should go for it.

KrismanX · 30 November 2016, 04:22 AM

If I could, I would own the entire line of Rolex watches...I'd throw in AP, PP, ALS, JLC and a few other lines while we're at it.

osamu · 30 November 2016, 04:27 AM

I have no problems with someone owning both. If you love Rolex Divers, why not? Given my limited budget and massive list of watches I want, owning 2 similar watches wouldn't be for me personally, but some people are loyal to one brand and/or one style and I understand that.

avantix · 30 November 2016, 04:33 AM

I own the DSSD, the 116613LN, 116613LB and 116610LV

glg · 30 November 2016, 04:59 AM

I own subc and sd4k, and I'm happy .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Adamk · 30 November 2016, 05:30 AM

Just the SubC, I never liked the DSSD

dodober · 30 November 2016, 05:51 AM

There's no reason not to have both because they're great, but if you're going to have only these two, I'd get the Sub LV instead, so you could add colour!

Cheers!

2016-11-24 15.36.44 copia

watchwatcher · 30 November 2016, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by avantix

I own the DSSD, the 116613LN, 116613LB and 116610LV

Yeah, baby!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dodober

There's no reason not to have both because they're great, but if you're going to have only these two, I'd get the Sub LV instead, so you could add colour!

Cheers!

2016-11-24 15.36.44 copia

Beautiful collection!

joli160 · 30 November 2016, 08:40 AM

The DSSD is a totally different watch. Only on first glance from far away you might confuse them. Sure has it's place alongside a Sub imho

mactruck · 30 November 2016, 08:45 AM

I have both a DSSD and a SubC and I alternate. Some days I like it light and some days I want to know what's on the wrist. I love them both. Now trying to decide between the Hulk and a TT.

gwalker · 30 November 2016, 09:55 AM

Yep my only 2 watches from 2008-2013 I think when I got my AP. I wore my DSSD daily from 2008 until 2012 when I bought my sub c after that I'm where my DSSD 5 to 10 times a year but it is a sentimental piece that I got for graduation and I could never part with it. I loved the deep-sea but after starting to where the sub I realized it was just too thick and I have an 8" wrist.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rph08 · 30 November 2016, 10:12 AM

If you really want both of those watches, then I say go for it. My Submariner 14060m is one of my favorite watches, but I still added an SD4K (for several reasons) and have been pretty dang happy with it.

GradyPhilpott · 30 November 2016, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golflife2

Lol. Funny enough I do own both but I think there is a difference. Size for one crystal for two and of course the clasp. Oh and no date window.

I didn't realize you owned both when I wrote that.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

HeartRolex · 30 November 2016, 03:39 PM

Nope.

japenney · 30 November 2016, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

D-blue and 114060? sure!

I second this. Two unique looks.

Rolex fan 61 · 30 November 2016, 05:44 PM

No sorry they are too similar IMHO

Onikage · 30 November 2016, 06:55 PM

Nope. Don't have the wrist time. Props to those who do.

30 November 2016, 03:56 AM	#40
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	No far too similar and the DSSD does not fit on my wrist __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

30 November 2016, 04:06 AM	#41
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Too similar for me. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

30 November 2016, 04:17 AM	#43
faz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Faz Location: California Watch: like'em all Posts: 4,689	There are way too many beautiful watches out there that I would like to own and spend my money on. I won't own two (or in some cases as pictured above three or more) very similar looking watches from the same brand. But at the end of the day, owning a watch is a very personal thing, and if one enjoys the subtle differences (even if no one else in the world would see or appreciate those differences) then one should go for it. __________________ -Faz Instagram @fazmoto

30 November 2016, 04:22 AM	#44
KrismanX "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Kristofer Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: my feet. Posts: 2,364	If I could, I would own the entire line of Rolex watches...I'd throw in AP, PP, ALS, JLC and a few other lines while we're at it. __________________ No sticker left behind. "Better three hours too soon, than a minute too late." "All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us." ref. 116520 Daytona - 10/2014

30 November 2016, 08:40 AM	#51
joli160 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: NL Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 14,763	The DSSD is a totally different watch. Only on first glance from far away you might confuse them. Sure has it's place alongside a Sub imho __________________ Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.

29 November 2016, 10:08 PM	#31
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,801	I had both for awhile and eventually moved the DSSD in favor of the Sub-C ND. Thought that the sub was more wearable for me and the money out of the flip helped me get another watch that I wanted.

29 November 2016, 10:28 PM	#33
OmegaJJH "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Rolex & Omega Posts: 6,668	For my budget they are too similar for me. If I had unlimited funds, hell yeah i'd have both.

30 November 2016, 12:12 AM	#35
Golflife2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Alberta Posts: 62	Thanks for all the feed back guys!!

30 November 2016, 12:30 AM	#36
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	DB or LVc sure, otherwise too similar.

30 November 2016, 12:35 AM	#37
WAK4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Bill Location: NJ Watch: Always changing Posts: 4,172	No, but that's because I've had a resistance to a black Sub Date ever since I started collecting. Now, the SD and a Deep Sea? Yup, been there done that.

30 November 2016, 03:39 AM	#39
r8t3d_M "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Felipe Location: NYC Watch: Me ;) Posts: 2,894	I would definitely own both..if I had the money for it..

30 November 2016, 04:08 AM	#42
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,055	Absolutely, although I guess it would depend on how many watches were in the collection for me...as I like a little variety. But the diver bezel is one of the most useful functions on a sports watch, IMO. Actually, I'm kind of contemplating adding a DSSD in with two subs even as we speak. Decisions, decisions...

30 November 2016, 04:27 AM	#45
osamu "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Honolulu Posts: 1,322	I have no problems with someone owning both. If you love Rolex Divers, why not? Given my limited budget and massive list of watches I want, owning 2 similar watches wouldn't be for me personally, but some people are loyal to one brand and/or one style and I understand that.

30 November 2016, 04:33 AM	#46
avantix "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Montreal Watch: DSSD 116613 116500 Posts: 197	I own the DSSD, the 116613LN, 116613LB and 116610LV

30 November 2016, 04:59 AM	#47
glg "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: Athens Posts: 63	I own subc and sd4k, and I'm happy . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 November 2016, 05:30 AM	#48
Adamk Banned Join Date: Aug 2016 Real Name: Adam Location: U.S Watch: 116710 Posts: 190	Just the SubC, I never liked the DSSD

30 November 2016, 05:51 AM	#49
dodober "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Madrid, Spain Watch: SUBc LV, BLNR Posts: 61	There's no reason not to have both because they're great, but if you're going to have only these two, I'd get the Sub LV instead, so you could add colour! Cheers! 2016-11-24 15.36.44 copia

30 November 2016, 08:45 AM	#52
mactruck "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Washinton D.C. Posts: 614	I have both a DSSD and a SubC and I alternate. Some days I like it light and some days I want to know what's on the wrist. I love them both. Now trying to decide between the Hulk and a TT.

30 November 2016, 09:55 AM	#53
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	Would you own both if you could? Yep my only 2 watches from 2008-2013 I think when I got my AP. I wore my DSSD daily from 2008 until 2012 when I bought my sub c after that I'm where my DSSD 5 to 10 times a year but it is a sentimental piece that I got for graduation and I could never part with it. I loved the deep-sea but after starting to where the sub I realized it was just too thick and I have an 8" wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

30 November 2016, 10:12 AM	#54
rph08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Chris Location: USA Posts: 992	If you really want both of those watches, then I say go for it. My Submariner 14060m is one of my favorite watches, but I still added an SD4K (for several reasons) and have been pretty dang happy with it.

30 November 2016, 03:39 PM	#56
HeartRolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Butterfly Location: USA Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX Posts: 637	Nope.

30 November 2016, 05:44 PM	#58
Rolex fan 61 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: UK Posts: 1,262	No sorry they are too similar IMHO

30 November 2016, 06:55 PM	#59
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	Nope. Don't have the wrist time. Props to those who do. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode