ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: AP offshore ceramic diver or AP offshore ceramic chrono | |||
AP offshore ceramic Diver | 30 | 48.39% | |
AP offshore ceramic chrono | 32 | 51.61% | |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
3 December 2016, 07:12 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
Ceramic Diver or Ceramic ROO Chrono. Which would you choose?
Like the thread states which would you choose between these 2? Trying to decide.
Either the offshore ceramic diver or the offshore all ceramic chrono with the anthracite dial. |
3 December 2016, 07:16 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
|
I would vote diver, I have it and it is really cool, but the 44 is awesome as well, but for the price of the 44 you can get the CE diver and another nice watch, a Rolex sub no date for example, plus the diver isn't produced anymore and is getting harder to get.
|
3 December 2016, 07:40 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
No contest... Which would u choose tho?
|
3 December 2016, 07:56 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
If money is not an issue I'd have the 44. For me it was and I had the 15707ce
|
3 December 2016, 08:07 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
Sometimes…actually, no – scrub that!
All too often, I seriously wonder how half the membership of this place manages to get themselves up, washed, dressed, and fed, each morning! I guarantee that within the next 6 months, somebody will start a poll thread asking what bloody cereal they should get, or how well done their toast should be! But seeing as you asked, I suggest you get the ceramic one – unless you prefer the other ceramic one more. Of course, you could always phone a friend and see what (s)he suggests. Oh, and before you do start that poll, the answers are: Rice Krispies*, and light brown – so there you go, that’s one other dilemma off your list. *If you put your ear close to the bowl, you’ll be able to hear them going snap, crackle, and pop – if that doesn’t put a smile on your face in the morning, then nothing will… |
3 December 2016, 08:14 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
ROO 44. Looking forward to it!
|
3 December 2016, 08:37 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
If it were for me ... Diver. For the price of the 44, I'd save and stretch to RG 44.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
3 December 2016, 08:55 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
|
3 December 2016, 11:22 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
3 December 2016, 12:17 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
Quote:
I was just curious to see what people thought here between the 2 ceramic watches. Because a decent ceramic diver is around 20-22k. But for 6k-8k more you can get the ceramic chrono. Then technically yes, for another 6k you can get the gold ceramic, then another 6k after that you can get something else. Where do you stop at that point? haha. |
|
3 December 2016, 12:48 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
Ceramic chrono is nice but at 41,800 overpriced. I opted for a RG44 and a SS44. Wait a few years and pick one up in the low 20s.
|
3 December 2016, 01:04 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
i picked the chrono based on the assumption that you have the wrist for it. I like it more than the diver, but the diver just fits me better.
|
3 December 2016, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
|
3 December 2016, 05:13 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
|
I voted Diver but then I'm biased.
Fun fact: the CE diver is the only diver with a matte black dial. Also had the 44 CE but it was too big, and a bit boring for me. |
3 December 2016, 10:12 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 106
|
Ceramic Diver or Ceramic ROO Chrono. Which would you choose?
I had the CE diver. Loved the orange highlights. Great watch, but I eventually got tired of the dial. It just didn't excite me. Now I have the 44 CE and I do prefer it better. I like having the useful Chrono complication and it livens up the dial as well. For an extra 6-8k, in my mind it's worth it. I can't say enough about the quality of the finishing. I love the sharp edges of the Chrono pushers.
(Full disclosure though, I do have my 44CE up for sale to help fund moving up to the platinum 44. I liked the 44 so much now I want to get the platinum blue dial!) |
3 December 2016, 10:27 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
|
3 December 2016, 10:58 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Diver.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
3 December 2016, 11:14 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
Great looking diver. But I'm not sure how you could think the 44 would be boring compared to the diver. The 44 has more going on with the dial than the diver. Unless the little bit or orange is what excites you?
|
3 December 2016, 11:16 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
Under 28k? Hmmmm you must negotiate better than me. I couldn't convince any of the dealers I spoke to who have them to sell under 28k whether it was new or used. But if it can be had under 28k, then the gap between the diver and RG is even wider than before. Though I'm not sure what used RG's sell at. I was offered a brand new one at 35k by my AD.
|
4 December 2016, 01:03 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Watch: ROO
Posts: 1,040
|
you could have bought my 4 month old full ceramic for 28k..and with an $800 strap
__________________
41mm SS ROC blue dial |
4 December 2016, 01:06 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
|
4 December 2016, 01:54 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,707
|
love the ceramic diver, hard to justify 20k on a diver, thats why I got rid of it but dam is a cool watch.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein |
4 December 2016, 03:06 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
|
|
4 December 2016, 03:26 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
CE diver also has a much better resale value if I decide to flip it, given the fact that it's in fairly good demand and practically no supply. |
|
4 December 2016, 03:27 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
What is really needed is a 42mm Ceramic ROO chrono
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
4 December 2016, 03:30 AM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 842
|
Quote:
I saw a few on here for sale at 20-21k like 6 months ago, but those are all gone. it's interesting though when I see ceramic APs at 42mm for the chrono, it seems too much stuffed into such a small face. Whereas on the steel it is not as noticeable. I think 44mm is the right size for a ceramic watch with dials on it. I like the case back on the diver movement more than the 44mm movement. Not sure why they didn't make the back plate rose gold like they did on the diver. |
|
4 December 2016, 04:02 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
Quote:
|
|
4 December 2016, 04:38 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
|
4 December 2016, 04:49 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
Ceramic Diver or Ceramic ROO Chrono. Which would you choose?
|
4 December 2016, 04:56 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,650
|
AP offshore ceramic chrono
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.