ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2017, 02:22 PM | #1 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
|
Why the Cyclops??
I really like the new Sea Dweller and will most likely buy it because its a nice looking and very interesting watch to me.
But I do wonder why they added a cyclops? The lack of cyclops was the most visual difference and signature of the Sea Dweller as compared to a Sub with date. Yes of course there are other visual differences, but the lack of cyclops was the one thing that stood out immediately. Also wasn't the original reason Rolex gave for not having a cyclops on the Sea Dweller due to the cyclops affecting the integrity of the crystal when going down to extreme depths? |
23 March 2017, 02:25 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
The cyclops is an identifing visual feature on a Rolex from afar.
A pity it is an unattractive one. |
23 March 2017, 02:58 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Asia
Posts: 714
|
For those who like cyclops, can always buy a Sub. IMO making the new SD larger than 42mm and cyclops limit the option for those who don't wear big watch and prefer without cyclops.
I have DSSD too but find it a bit big and most importantly too thick to wear on daily basis due to cuff clearance. I like dive watch and Was planning to get one since last year but waited for debute for 50th Ann. Ed. ......SD is 3mm thinner than DS but adding a cyclops make it less easy to clear the cuff.... |
23 March 2017, 03:00 PM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Ageing demographic maybe?
|
23 March 2017, 03:19 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: YG GMT/blue Sky-D
Posts: 529
|
The Cyclops does not change the stressing on the crystal, it is a separate piece. On a side note, as a former commercial saturation diver, a "lowly" Submariner is more than up to the task of taking on any dive you might do with respect to depth rating (although without a HE valve, the crystal can become dislodged fduring decompression after a sat dive). I like the idea of a cyclops, and have thought about adding one to my DSSDso that I can read the date
|
23 March 2017, 03:29 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
|
|
23 March 2017, 03:35 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: N/A
Watch: AP, VC, Breguet
Posts: 1,581
|
It's something that most rolex owners like and it makes the watch easily identifiable as a rolex. When the normal non-WIS drops thousands on a rolex they want it to look like one.
__________________
The Most Valuable Commodity is Time Audemars, Vacheron, Breguet, Jaquet Droz, JLC, Rolex, Omega, Cartier |
23 March 2017, 03:49 PM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
|
23 March 2017, 03:53 PM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
I believe Rolex realizes who their market is. It isn't young scuba divers that's for certain.
|
23 March 2017, 03:53 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
i have never, ever heard of anyone complain about the lack of the cyclops being a deterrent due to magnification being required to see the date on a SD; i have heard of people complain about there being no cyclops which makes it seem inferior to a sub and not worth the money.
rolex just put 2 and 2 together and i can't blame them purely on a business case. as a fan of the heritage however, they can pound sand. this should have been a DSSD reduced w/ cyclops or a whole new model and let the SD phase out naturally. |
23 March 2017, 03:54 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
|
23 March 2017, 04:20 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
The original Sea Dweller had a domed crystal and of course didn't have a Cyclops, as it wouldn't sit properly as it wasn't flat, if I remember rightly.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
23 March 2017, 04:23 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Middle East
Watch: 116710 LN, PAM390
Posts: 887
|
A lot of Rolex fans like the cyclops. I am one of them.
|
23 March 2017, 04:25 PM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: YG GMT/blue Sky-D
Posts: 529
|
Easy enough to manufacture a cyclops with a negatively radiused back that would sit nicely on a convex surface, and it looks like that is what they did
|
23 March 2017, 04:38 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
Do you know the cyclops is a stick on item?
Soon enough on YouTube there will be tutorial on removing cyclops. Problem solved.
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted |
23 March 2017, 04:46 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Posts: 61
|
Cyclop is the symbol of Rolex. For Rolex, Cyclop is the norm. If they didn't put cyclops on SD, it was purely technical. If now they can put Cyclops on them, it's just a new proof of their advanced technical abilities. I mean if they can have cyclops resisting such a high pressure, it is totally normal to "show off" their savoir-faire.
|
23 March 2017, 04:57 PM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: YG GMT/blue Sky-D
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2017, 05:04 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Posts: 61
|
I know. The increased technical ability I'm mentioning is making sure they will remain even with high pressure. The problem was that they couldn't put cyclops on SD because it wouldn't resist pressure.
|
23 March 2017, 05:09 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: YG GMT/blue Sky-D
Posts: 529
|
What is your source for this information? It sounds dubious to me.
|
23 March 2017, 05:13 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Posts: 61
|
|
23 March 2017, 05:41 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
|
23 March 2017, 05:46 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: YG GMT/blue Sky-D
Posts: 529
|
|
23 March 2017, 05:47 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rome
Posts: 94
|
The Cyclope on that watch is a kick in the balls
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Pro |
23 March 2017, 10:54 PM | #24 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
|
If we agree that the cyclops is the or a "symbol of Rolex", then they are just trying to bring the SD into the fold with the rest.
Either way it will be interesting to see where the SD, DSSD, and Sub go over the next decade. I'm excited about the future of all three of these Rolexes. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 March 2017, 11:04 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,775
|
Can't wait for the low magnification issues to start.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
23 March 2017, 11:08 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I've seen quite a bit of snobbery on this issue, the idea that now it has a Cyclops it looks just like another Sub to most people at a glance.
|
23 March 2017, 11:10 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
|
agreed, cyclop doesn't make sense to SD
|
23 March 2017, 11:11 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Yoda
Location: USA
Posts: 468
|
It was a stick-on in the past. Rumor has it they may have actually "carved" this one as part of the crystal to solve the old issues. Might be interesting for the first guy that tries to knock it off with a chisel. I'm betting they just stuck it on knowing that 1 in 100,000 people may actually take this to a substantial depth...
__________________
"The world embarrasses me, and I cannot dream that this watch exists and has no watchmaker." Voltaire |
23 March 2017, 11:24 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
The reason earlier generation of the SD didn't have the cyclops was because it compromised the integrity of the crystal at the depths the watch was rated for. Obviously they've engineered a solution to this issue, whether it be a different way to attach it to the crystal, or perhaps it's formed as a single piece of sapphire. In any case, I've never liked the look of the cyclops and it's one of the reasons I own a 5-digit SD and non of my Subs have dates.
|
23 March 2017, 11:30 PM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
Be curious to see if anyone on this board or another site speaks with Rolex while at Basel and asks this question. Seems all we have is speculation.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.