|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 May 2008, 01:54 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 81
|
My new 2254.50
Loving the clasp compared to my Sub.
__________________
Seiko 7A28-7049 Rolex 16610 Omega 2254.50.00 |
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 08:24 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Nice Looking Omega
 Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth   "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
|
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 10:17 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Better clasp, better lume. Omega is the best bang for the money!
Huge congrats on this classic Omega!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 11:22 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
And indeed it is a better bang for the buck. I love my Sub and it meant a lot to me to buy a Rolex for personal reasons, but after wearing the SMP for a few days, I gotta say I'd steer anyone who asked in Omega's direction. (Edited to add) Well only some Omega's: a cruise of eBay suggests that Omega has some real difficulties with keeping their line stable. Frankly I'm kind of shocked they ended production on this watch and the white face GMT. Yeah the Planet Ocean is a beautiful watch, and I'll enjoy owning one someday, but one of the things I like about Rolex: my sub looks like my dad's sub and so on. Well at least until this year's Basel. I am very disappointed that the Sub is going the way of the big case GMT IIc. No matter how I try, I can't like that watch - and the new Subs just don't do it for me. In the end, glad I own both. Need to get one of those Seiko divers now :)
__________________
Seiko 7A28-7049 Rolex 16610 Omega 2254.50.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 08:08 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
|
Enjoy the new toy!!
|
|
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 10:07 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
"msf",
have you read this Comparative Review of the Omega Seamaster Professional Model 2254.50.00 VS. The Rolex Submariner 16610 Y Series? If not, I can recommend that review highly. BTW.: If you like, you can add your first name in the avatar field by going to "USER CP" in the blue bar top left and choose "Edit Your Details". It's just a suggestion since somehow addressing you "msf" seems rather impersonal? 
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
|
|
|
17 May 2008, 11:57 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Seiko 7A28-7049 Rolex 16610 Omega 2254.50.00 |
||
|
|
|
|
23 May 2008, 03:21 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Vegas, baby!
Watch: one from ShopNBC!
Posts: 436
|
The 2254 is a classic, perhaps one of the nicest divers ever designed. Too bad Omega discontinued it!
__________________
 SeaDweller "Z" Yachtmaster "Z" Oyster Perpetual "M" |
|
|
|
|
26 May 2008, 09:26 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Gary
Location: GMT-6
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,350
|
Two great watches. I like a chunky watch, so I wish the Omega was a little thicker. It's hard to beat though.
|
|
|
|
|
29 May 2017, 12:38 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Nice!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
