The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2018, 03:17 AM   #1
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Incoming 5512 Exclamation point repair

!961 Exclamation point Radium dial...what else can I say...?

Will add more photos as I go through the service and let's see if I can get the correct period crystal.
Attached Images
                 
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 03:38 AM   #2
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Looks like a very pretty watch.

Shame with the hand drag. Something you could do about that?
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 03:43 AM   #3
btinl
2024 Pledge Member
 
btinl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: .
Watch: on my wrist
Posts: 1,973
Wow, that one looks amazing!
btinl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 04:12 AM   #4
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by roh123 View Post
Looks like a very pretty watch.

Shame with the hand drag. Something you could do about that?
He asked me the same question and imo, I would be a fool to attempt to smooth it out or clear it up. Even though I am here to serve others, with a watch like this, too many things could go in the wrong direction.
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 04:20 AM   #5
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
He asked me the same question and imo, I would be a fool to attempt to smooth it out or clear it up. Even though I am here to serve others, with a watch like this, too many things could go in the wrong direction.
Agreed. I’ve heard stories of watchmakers being able to polish it out somehow. You never know these days..
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 04:21 AM   #6
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Fantastic. Thanks for sharing.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 04:28 AM   #7
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by roh123 View Post
Agreed. I’ve heard stories of watchmakers being able to polish it out somehow. You never know these days..
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2018, 04:41 AM   #8
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
Amazing watch, thanks for sharing....wow @ that case being preserved like that after all these years.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 01:38 PM   #9
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
Beautiful example thanks for sharing...looking forward to the additional pics
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 02:23 PM   #10
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
What a beauty!
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 02:58 PM   #11
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: Milsub
Posts: 1,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
He asked me the same question and imo, I would be a fool to attempt to smooth it out or clear it up. Even though I am here to serve others, with a watch like this, too many things could go in the wrong direction.
perhaps a light touch with some premium rodico?
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 03:53 PM   #12
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,417
Wow! Super watch.
Dr.Smellody is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 10:14 PM   #13
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Nice piece indeed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 11:22 PM   #14
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
Nice watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2018, 11:25 PM   #15
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
Congratulations.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 08:38 AM   #16
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
perhaps a light touch with some premium rodico?
Premium rodico is great for little topical debree, however, since the hour hand rubbed through the clear laquer finish, rodico would not do much. Also, as I mentioned, the RISK of possible damage out weights the "good" that might come of it.
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 08:52 AM   #17
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
Premium rodico is great for little topical debree, however, since the hour hand rubbed through the clear laquer finish, rodico would not do much. Also, as I mentioned, the RISK of possible damage out weights the "good" that might come of it.
I heard zapon might do the trick. Of course not a simple job but I heard people being able to restore scratches on lacquer this way.
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 10:25 AM   #18
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: Milsub
Posts: 1,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
Premium rodico is great for little topical debree, however, since the hour hand rubbed through the clear laquer finish, rodico would not do much. Also, as I mentioned, the RISK of possible damage out weights the "good" that might come of it.


Agreed. Risks outweighs benefits.


Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2018, 05:05 PM   #19
waspy1
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
What’s your opinion on the minute hand? Looks too long, no?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
waspy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2018, 01:19 AM   #20
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by waspy1 View Post
What’s your opinion on the minute hand? Looks too long, no?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed.
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2018, 04:04 AM   #21
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
In love with that insert :)
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 January 2018, 08:15 PM   #22
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
I thought that the general consensus was that the exclamation point was used during the transition period between Radium and Tritium and therefore that dial should not be Radium.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2018, 01:45 AM   #23
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by fmc000 View Post
I thought that the general consensus was that the exclamation point was used during the transition period between Radium and Tritium and therefore that dial should not be Radium.
Actually, the Exclamation point is to reference the fact that the levels of Radium have been regulated per Atomic Energy Commission regulations.
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2018, 03:13 AM   #24
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Beautiful!!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2018, 09:22 PM   #25
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
Actually, the Exclamation point is to reference the fact that the levels of Radium have been regulated per Atomic Energy Commission regulations.
Thank you.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2018, 01:09 AM   #26
onioncrown
"TRF" Member
 
onioncrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Sam
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex Oyster Perp
Posts: 74
Looks really good! Congrats!
__________________
Cheers,

Sam
@onioncrown
onioncrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2018, 02:15 PM   #27
007Sub
"TRF" Member
 
007Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Greg
Location: USA
Watch: Milsub
Posts: 1,635
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillip ridley View Post
Actually, the Exclamation point is to reference the fact that the levels of Radium have been regulated per Atomic Energy Commission regulations.
Exactly. Radium in there just lower levels. If memory serves, 1962 was the only year of exclamation points, then they moved to trit.
__________________

@true_patina
@true.dome
007Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 January 2018, 12:27 PM   #28
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by 007Sub View Post
Exactly. Radium in there just lower levels. If memory serves, 1962 was the only year of exclamation points, then they moved to trit.

I would love to see some docs on that - radium in lower levels.

Tudor can have ! on 61-63, and it is Tritium (though higher than 25 or 15 as in Tudor's case).

I have a 61 Tudor PCG that puts out about 4x stronger than the background radiation today but a sliver compared to some Radium stuff.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2018, 07:48 AM   #29
phillip ridley
2024 Pledge Member
 
phillip ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Watch: 1971 Rolex Red Sub
Posts: 555
After photos of this beautiful 5513
Attached Images
                               
phillip ridley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2018, 07:55 AM   #30
emersm
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
emersm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,542
Well done, Phillip!
emersm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.