ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 March 2018, 07:06 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,466
|
Why all the new Sub rumors this year?
I recall during the run up to Basel last year we had zero rumors about a new Sub. In fact, I specifically remember people saying we were probably at least 5 years or so away from a new Sub (based on some anniversary year). But this year, there quite a few new SUb rumors. i.e. new movement, slimmer lugs etc.
I wonder why? |
3 March 2018, 07:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Baltimore
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 311
|
They are changing all the lines around it. Datejust, Seadweller, Day-Date all got slimmer lugs and new movements.
|
3 March 2018, 07:27 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 59
|
Could explain the lack of supply of the current sub as well.... maybe they are preparing for the new release. This is honestly just wishful thinking on my part because I really love the old red letter sub
|
3 March 2018, 07:36 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Why indeed.
As to slimmer lugs, that's just wishful thinking. |
3 March 2018, 07:51 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: jakarta
Posts: 32
|
Subs are their best selling items, they need to test the new movement to other product first before put it in the subs.. since dj41, sd43 have use this new movement, and also almost all competitor product have go up to above 48 hour power reserved, so they have no chance to put their subs back to the long power reserved trends.
|
3 March 2018, 07:54 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,909
|
Prob because Rolex has a new and improved movement they would want to put in the sub
__________________
|
3 March 2018, 07:59 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
|
3 March 2018, 08:14 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
3 March 2018, 08:16 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I'm just waiting for ALL of the incomings from those who want "thinner lugs" It will be great to see them all so happy with their new purchases
|
3 March 2018, 08:19 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: In a house
Posts: 845
|
Cuse we all have nothing better to do but dream about new rolexes.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk |
3 March 2018, 08:21 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Ironed out the 'questionable' design elements going back to the earlier proportions, I think he meant. I'd have to agree with the direction Rolex appears to be going as well. I've never been particularly keen on the recent phase where Rolex went nuts redesigning all their iconic models. Sooner the better in my opinion.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
3 March 2018, 08:30 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,909
|
Quote:
I have no idea what Rolex has ready for Basel 2018 nor am I predicting anything.
__________________
|
|
3 March 2018, 08:31 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: LA
Posts: 427
|
conjecture.
|
3 March 2018, 08:32 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Baltimore
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 311
|
|
3 March 2018, 10:08 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
Well, I do like my GMTIIC, but to be honest I don’t need another Ceramic Sub-alike. I would like an older Day Date - in WG w/ sticks... or even a classic steel DJ 16234. |
|
3 March 2018, 10:09 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
I think new movement............ and maaaaaaybe red lettering......that’s it!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
3 March 2018, 10:27 AM | #17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Quote:
For the record, I disagree. |
|
3 March 2018, 10:33 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: london Ontario
Watch: Waiting list..
Posts: 66
|
Rolex is about to put a red text line on almost every model lol.
|
3 March 2018, 10:34 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Fair question. So far, the 32xx has only appeared in newly designed models. Rolex has yet to put it in existing models. Based on that limited data (we only have four models to go by at this point), we could infer Rolex is intent on building a portolio of new models with new movements, and not blurring the lines. It's pretty early to tell, though.
|
3 March 2018, 10:39 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 2,410
|
Yah. Red lettering is hot demand.
|
3 March 2018, 10:54 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
|
Rolex always upgrades the PM models first, then the two tone, then the SS, the exception to this is the Daytona. Movements get upgraded, and sometimes the new movement for the new model gets put in the old case, this happened with the last 5 digit gmts.
For consistancy I would expect the two tone daytonas to get ceramic bezels this year. Other than that, its all pretty much guess work. But we will soon know. |
3 March 2018, 11:01 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 442
|
The Sub date has been around for 8 years, the Sub for 6 years, and that seems like the shorter end for past models. But I wouldn't be surprised if Rolex added the new movement but kept the Sub about the same cosmetically.
|
3 March 2018, 11:21 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
The SS Sub Date has been around for 8 years. The WG Sub Date debuted in 2008, so as a design, the super-case Sub Date has been going for ten years. Either way, replacement does seem premature by Rolex standards.
|
3 March 2018, 11:27 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 271
|
Because frankly we have nothing better to do!
|
3 March 2018, 11:28 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
So many here seem unhappy and disgruntled about the current Sub. There ARE alternatives, such as the Sea Dweller, DSSD, etc. I have no gripes with the current configuration and with the current demand worldwide many non watch forum Rolex buyers don't seem to either. So what happens come Basel if there is no "new Sub"? LOL
|
3 March 2018, 11:34 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Tom Wentworth
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex 116610 Sub
Posts: 541
|
For me personally it's just fun to dream and then dream out loud. Oh the endless possibilities... Cheers
|
3 March 2018, 11:44 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Posts: 1,550
|
And I thought even if you have a case redesign in the sub .....doesn’t it start at the top with precious metal and eventually, years later, get down to the ss model...so the hoopla should be more contained maybe??
|
3 March 2018, 11:46 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Yes. The people foaming at the mouth for a new SS Sub/Date this year probably have rabies and are neurologically impaired.
|
3 March 2018, 01:35 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
|
I really really hope it doesn’t change. I finally got to try one on after several months of going into the same dealer and was completely sold. Ok it was the all yellow gold version but it wasn’t difficult to imagine in steel.
|
3 March 2018, 02:45 PM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
The 3235 movement, stupid!!! (To paraphrase a former presidential candidate).
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.