ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 May 2018, 03:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Tom
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Sub 14060 "D"
Posts: 108
|
Sla017 vs 14060?
Hi guys,
Just wondering if owners of the gorgeous SLA017 also own A Rolex Submariner and can comment on the comparisons. My 14060M Sub is fantastic but the Seiko seems very interesting. Thanks! |
10 May 2018, 07:38 AM | #2 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
Great retro design, but I can't get passed on the substance itself. Feels like SBDX001/017 has everything that it has but for "fraction" of the price. That's just me. Don't get me wrong, I like the watch and I think its exclusive. My wallet doesn't agree.
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
|
10 May 2018, 09:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Edward
Location: USA
Posts: 858
|
I loved mine (SLA017), but it was ultimately too big for my tastes, mostly too thick, but also a big large in other ways. But I like smaller watches. It's amazing just to look at tha thing though -- a stunner.
|
10 May 2018, 01:21 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
Dial crushes sub
|
14 May 2018, 01:23 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: new orleans
Posts: 266
|
Way too thick! I sold mine and am back to my Tudor Sub from 1991.
|
14 May 2018, 09:31 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Har
Location: Tukwila, WA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,571
|
The Seiko is way too thick. Can’t really fit on my cuffs. The Sub ND is a home run both versatile and classic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Go for the timepiece you love. You will save more. ... |
15 May 2018, 12:20 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Submariner.
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
15 May 2018, 01:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Colorado Springs
Watch: Seiko's
Posts: 2,563
|
|
27 May 2018, 10:07 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
I own both, 14060 more comfy, better balanced
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
27 May 2018, 02:21 PM | #10 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,588
|
They are both great watches.
The Seiko has a date feature which I like, and the dial is more alluring than the small dot dial Submariner. The lume on the Seiko is surprisingly much better than the Rolex. The Submariner does wear flatter on the wrist, but this isn't a deal breaker because we are talking about dive watches, which one may expect to have a bit of thickness. The Submariner has 20mm lugs which is a great size for aftermarket straps while the Seiko has 18.8mm lugs (19mm). For me personally the dial and date of the SLA017 wins out and it comes standard with an Oyster style bracelet in the package. The SLA017 was limited to 2,000 so it will become less common over time.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
27 May 2018, 03:11 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Tom
Location: So Fla
Watch: 16660/16710
Posts: 345
|
I've posted these at some point before, but they give a good idea of how the Seiko slots in between a 14060M and a 16660. I give the 5 digit Sea-Dwellers the nod for best go anywhere Rolex diver, but the Seiko is an incredibly well designed and finished watch. It's everything Seiko does best in a reissue of its most historic dive watch.
|
28 May 2018, 12:56 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Tom
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: Sub 14060 "D"
Posts: 108
|
Thanks a million for the replies. I currently have a G-Series 14060M like the one pictured on the right and it wears perfectly...just melts away on the rest. I was looking for another watch to compliment the Sub and the Seiko looked very interesting. I will be checking out the Seiko this week and will update on what I find. The case thickness is very noticeable in the pics.......
thanks! |
28 May 2018, 01:10 AM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Quote:
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
28 May 2018, 01:56 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 47
|
I had the SLA017 and SubC at the same time. The SLA017 is more casual but if it’s going to be part of a collection, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. The OEM silicone strap and bracelet aren’t great but it looks great on a NATO or a tropic strap. I ended up trading the SubC for a Hulk as I got green fever but The SubC and SLA017 co-existed in my rotation just fine. I wore the Seiko more on the weekends or traveling while the SubC got more wrist time during the work week.
|
28 May 2018, 07:31 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeast
Watch: Yourself
Posts: 1,020
|
Sla017 vs 14060?
Quote:
Two very different watches. Dial alone makes enough difference to me. 14060 sits flat while SLA017 is a bit taller which doesn’t bother my 7” wrist. I like SLA017 with rubber or leather strap while I wear my 14060 with mostly bracelet and NATO strap in summer. I think these two could be great for any collection. Here are my humble diver collection. Cheers. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.