ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SkyJuice · 24 March 2019, 03:00 PM

Thanks for the infor!

inadeje · 24 March 2019, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roger Lococco

The OP is the most brilliant of posts, yet everyone is missing the true artistry. He’s joking everyone. It is a parody post. Very clever and well executed.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So he’s sticking-it to us stick dial advocates?

If that is the case and its a parody, it’s brilliantly executed

My signature says it all, I signed onto the 16710 stick dial hype, should I hide in a corner 037?

GMT Aviator · 25 March 2019, 12:45 AM

I’ve never read so much rubbish.

6 GMT’s here, two with stick dials. One of which was fitted by RSC during a dial replacement last year. Anyone who falls for stick dial talk is a sucker.

tacotaco · 25 March 2019, 01:06 AM

wow,

this has got to be the most hypebeast BS post of all time

its a a 12 year production run!

I have a GMT IIc LN, and am glad it was discontinued so its "rare"
but this variant BS is reaching...

nicely composed post but IMHO its crapola

tie219 · 25 March 2019, 01:53 AM

This clearly justifies an inevitable $15k premium on "stick dial" GMT's in the near future

Sweetswisssteel · 17 January 2021, 04:40 PM

My 116710LN V Serial 2010 Dial

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

sylvia070595 · 18 January 2021, 12:19 AM

I have a V serial 116710LN V53**** both have engrave in the inner ring and and 6 o'clock. and also have different font used in green text letter "S" looks likes a snake hahaha

1665fan · 18 January 2021, 12:31 AM

My V serial 2008 is rectangular dial....

Rori · 18 January 2021, 12:37 AM

I'll pay 100K for one of those.
Some Rolex resellers behave like they live in LaLaLand.

mykii · 18 January 2021, 12:44 AM

This valuation and estimation of production is literally just speculation. Not only is the recommended price not realized in either listings or purchases, the “rarity” and production caps are far less scientific than they are arbitrary.

I see no added value, rarity, or collectibility on this one. True collectibility stems from established rarity on a pre-existing hype model that was otherwise not available (e.g. 2020 card Hulks retailed for only a month before discontinuation in 2020 due to Covid). In these cases there is an established premium in the market and demand, unlike this analysis and dial variant. This falls into the category of nuanced Rolex variation over time that is a standard feature of almost all Rolex sports models, and very few of them provide added value. Dial variation on what was ultimately the least-demand GMT really doesn’t add up to much, if anything at all.

WS9D · 18 January 2021, 02:32 AM

Great info that is probably rather meaningless, never the less, well written.

18 January 2021, 12:37 AM	#39
Rori "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: Middle East Watch: Rolex / Tudor Posts: 3,592	I'll pay 100K for one of those. Some Rolex resellers behave like they live in LaLaLand. __________________ Good watches are made to tell time but some brands are obsessed to tell it in the most beautiful way possible.

18 January 2021, 12:44 AM	#40
mykii "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2020 Location: East Watch: AP+FPJ+ PP+Rolex Posts: 1,776	This valuation and estimation of production is literally just speculation. Not only is the recommended price not realized in either listings or purchases, the “rarity” and production caps are far less scientific than they are arbitrary. I see no added value, rarity, or collectibility on this one. True collectibility stems from established rarity on a pre-existing hype model that was otherwise not available (e.g. 2020 card Hulks retailed for only a month before discontinuation in 2020 due to Covid). In these cases there is an established premium in the market and demand, unlike this analysis and dial variant. This falls into the category of nuanced Rolex variation over time that is a standard feature of almost all Rolex sports models, and very few of them provide added value. Dial variation on what was ultimately the least-demand GMT really doesn’t add up to much, if anything at all. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24 March 2019, 03:00 PM	#31
SkyJuice "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Land of OZ Posts: 1,411	Thanks for the infor!

25 March 2019, 12:45 AM	#33
GMT Aviator 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: London Posts: 3,318	I’ve never read so much rubbish. 6 GMT’s here, two with stick dials. One of which was fitted by RSC during a dial replacement last year. Anyone who falls for stick dial talk is a sucker.

25 March 2019, 01:06 AM	#34
tacotaco "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: KCMO Watch: 116500 Black, DD40 Posts: 430	wow, this has got to be the most hypebeast BS post of all time its a a 12 year production run! I have a GMT IIc LN, and am glad it was discontinued so its "rare" but this variant BS is reaching... nicely composed post but IMHO its crapola

25 March 2019, 01:53 AM	#35
tie219 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Real Name: Troy Location: Houston, TX Watch: 16710 GMT, BBR Posts: 926	This clearly justifies an inevitable $15k premium on "stick dial" GMT's in the near future

17 January 2021, 04:40 PM	#36
Sweetswisssteel "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2016 Location: Brisbane Watch: 126618LB Posts: 588	My 116710LN V Serial 2010 Dial Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

18 January 2021, 12:19 AM	#37
sylvia070595 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2017 Location: Philippines Posts: 3	I have a V serial 116710LN V53**** both have engrave in the inner ring and and 6 o'clock. and also have different font used in green text letter "S" looks likes a snake hahaha

18 January 2021, 12:31 AM	#38
1665fan "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: East coast Posts: 6,660	My V serial 2008 is rectangular dial....

18 January 2021, 02:32 AM	#41
WS9D "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Steve Location: Shasta Watch: es..More Watches! Posts: 2,415	Great info that is probably rather meaningless, never the less, well written.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)