ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Lol-x · 11 February 2009, 09:12 AM

Rolex in recent times has released 2 new clasps.

We see a number of models migrating to the easylink fliplock and non-fliplock clasp.

Recently we have seen the new DeepSea clasp with micro adjustment.

From what I have read and heard it seems like the clasp on the DeepSea is superior, but I'm not sure.

Which clasp is the best and why, and which do you think will ultimately be the most used by Rolex in 10 years from now?

Lubrifar · 11 February 2009, 09:31 AM

What about the Daytona one? Is that the same as the one on GMT-IIc?

frostie · 11 February 2009, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lubrifar

What about the Daytona one? Is that the same as the one on GMT-IIc?

It looks the same to me

bodybump · 11 February 2009, 09:35 AM

I would go for the Deepsea Clasp...i dont have to go to an ad to have it adjusted and pay $20-30 and then come back home to rant here in the forum about the charge..

frostie · 11 February 2009, 09:35 AM

Voted for the deep sea clasp

It looks much more techy

SirLoki · 11 February 2009, 09:42 AM

dssd ftw!

i have all 3 as comparison and no doubt the dssd

rescue7 · 11 February 2009, 09:43 AM

I voted DeepSea clasp. The reason is being an owner of both the Glidelock clasp is great fitting bracelet and very well engineered.

Also the glidelock is geared more for adjustment without removing the watch from ones wrist.

Overkill · 11 February 2009, 09:51 AM

Actually, the DSSD bracelet would be great for the GMT-IIC for those who prefer the brushed links too!

Now you guys are making me consider sourcing a DSSD bracelet for my GMT-IIc when I buy it!

Andad · 11 February 2009, 10:48 AM

Except it won't fit - 21mm v 20mm.

But the thought was there.

Overkill · 11 February 2009, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Except it won't fit - 21mm v 20mm.

But the thought was there.

Oh, that's too bad :( Everyone talks about how the bracelet of the DSSD is too small for the case, so I assumed they had used the same bracelet size. Can you just take the clasp of the of the DSSD bracelet and stick it onto a Sub bracelet? Either way, 1mm isn't much bigger, I'm sure we could make it work

SLS · 11 February 2009, 10:56 AM

The clasp on the Daytona/GMT/Milguass will win out IMO. For one it is less expensive than the clasp on the DSSD and it is not as bulky. I just cant see this clasp fitting in with DJ or DD wearers.
~Scott

mike · 11 February 2009, 11:01 AM

Well, I have both and think the clasp on the GMT, Milgauss, and Daytona are so much easier to use than earlier versions.

That said, the DSSD, Submariner clasp is just a dream to use and get that perfect fit.

I think the diver clasp will be the sole domain of the Sub DS series.

Nica64 · 11 February 2009, 11:03 AM

DeepSea clasp with micro adjustment!!

Lol-x · 11 February 2009, 12:28 PM

So it might be that the glidelock DSSD clasp is the technically superior clasp, but because of costs etc. it might be limited in it's application to the range of sports watches.

Lion · 11 February 2009, 12:43 PM

I like to hear the banter about this clasp or band being compared to another one. I would think what matters is does the clasp or band work in the real world or do you have problems. Rolex has spent a lot of time and money on producing quality products that work under all conditions and take pride in their craftsmanship!!!

JJ Irani · 11 February 2009, 04:04 PM

While the DSSD clasp is definitely superior in engineering technology, the more practical one for day-to-day usage and most of the common and regular Rolex models, would be the one with the tiny HALF link fold-out or fold-in which I saw the other day on the GMT-IIC.

JJ

yannis · 11 February 2009, 05:12 PM

I would say the GMT-IIc one will prevail (i.e. will be more widely used) although i would have prefer to see clasp of the DSSD across the sport's watches range!

mfer · 12 February 2009, 01:06 AM

I feel like Rolex will only use the glide lock on the Sub and DSSD.

All others will be migrating to the GMT IIc clasp.

Daytona clasp is on it's way out. A good clasp, but not as good as the GMT IIc clasp IMHO.

View Poll Results: Which clasp will be king of clasps?
New clasp with easy link as on GMTIIC or Milgauss	28	35.44%
New clasp on the DeepSea Sea-Dweller with micro adjustment	51	64.56%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

11 February 2009, 09:12 AM	#1
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,593	Which clasp will win? Rolex in recent times has released 2 new clasps. We see a number of models migrating to the easylink fliplock and non-fliplock clasp. Recently we have seen the new DeepSea clasp with micro adjustment. From what I have read and heard it seems like the clasp on the DeepSea is superior, but I'm not sure. Which clasp is the best and why, and which do you think will ultimately be the most used by Rolex in 10 years from now? __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

11 February 2009, 09:35 AM	#4
bodybump ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Oscar Location: Florida Watch: Me!!! Posts: 23,233	I would go for the Deepsea Clasp...i dont have to go to an ad to have it adjusted and pay $20-30 and then come back home to rant here in the forum about the charge.. __________________

11 February 2009, 09:35 AM	#5
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Voted for the deep sea clasp It looks much more techy __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

11 February 2009, 09:51 AM	#8
Overkill "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Youssef Location: Cairo, Egypt Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue Posts: 925	Actually, the DSSD bracelet would be great for the GMT-IIC for those who prefer the brushed links too! Now you guys are making me consider sourcing a DSSD bracelet for my GMT-IIc when I buy it! __________________ Rolex GMT-Master II 116700 Rolex Explorer 214270 Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08 Panerai Radiomir PAM183

11 February 2009, 09:31 AM	#2
Lubrifar Banned Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Mr. T Location: anc/sfo Watch: for the signs! Posts: 776	What about the Daytona one? Is that the same as the one on GMT-IIc?

11 February 2009, 09:43 AM	#7
rescue7 Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Rescueguy Location: Here Watch: DSSD Posts: 1,129	I voted DeepSea clasp. The reason is being an owner of both the Glidelock clasp is great fitting bracelet and very well engineered. Also the glidelock is geared more for adjustment without removing the watch from ones wrist.

11 February 2009, 10:48 AM	#9
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,534	Except it won't fit - 21mm v 20mm. But the thought was there. __________________ E

11 February 2009, 10:56 AM	#11
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	The clasp on the Daytona/GMT/Milguass will win out IMO. For one it is less expensive than the clasp on the DSSD and it is not as bulky. I just cant see this clasp fitting in with DJ or DD wearers. ~Scott __________________ "The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922

11 February 2009, 11:01 AM	#12
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Well, I have both and think the clasp on the GMT, Milgauss, and Daytona are so much easier to use than earlier versions. That said, the DSSD, Submariner clasp is just a dream to use and get that perfect fit. I think the diver clasp will be the sole domain of the Sub DS series.

11 February 2009, 11:03 AM	#13
Nica64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,596	DeepSea clasp with micro adjustment!! __________________ ______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.

11 February 2009, 12:28 PM	#14
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,593	So it might be that the glidelock DSSD clasp is the technically superior clasp, but because of costs etc. it might be limited in it's application to the range of sports watches. __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

11 February 2009, 12:43 PM	#15
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	I like to hear the banter about this clasp or band being compared to another one. I would think what matters is does the clasp or band work in the real world or do you have problems. Rolex has spent a lot of time and money on producing quality products that work under all conditions and take pride in their craftsmanship!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

11 February 2009, 04:04 PM	#16
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	While the DSSD clasp is definitely superior in engineering technology, the more practical one for day-to-day usage and most of the common and regular Rolex models, would be the one with the tiny HALF link fold-out or fold-in which I saw the other day on the GMT-IIC. JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

11 February 2009, 05:12 PM	#17
yannis "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Real Name: Yannis Location: Europe Watch: maniac Posts: 9,070	I would say the GMT-IIc one will prevail (i.e. will be more widely used) although i would have prefer to see clasp of the DSSD across the sport's watches range! __________________ Rolex Submariner 116610LV \| Tudor 79220N DSSD MEMBERS - OWNERS CLUB

12 February 2009, 01:06 AM	#18
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	I feel like Rolex will only use the glide lock on the Sub and DSSD. All others will be migrating to the GMT IIc clasp. Daytona clasp is on it's way out. A good clasp, but not as good as the GMT IIc clasp IMHO. __________________ member#3242

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode