The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 October 2019, 01:29 AM   #1
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
AP Diver: Size perception

They say the camera doesn’t lie! But it does!! In one of these pictures, the Diver is way too big, whereas in the other it is a good size.

In truth, I know this is too big for me, but I love this watch so it’s my indulgent ‘don’t give a damn’ watch!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2019, 02:46 AM   #2
Collector2019
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 610
enjoy it bro - it's a bulky design, should and recommended to wear big and bold. Look nice on you
Collector2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2019, 04:32 AM   #3
Jp28
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Here and there
Posts: 575
A big part of this is due to how camera phones work.
If you take a close up the angles will always make it look big (per 2nd pic). Take from further away and then zoom in on the pic to get a better real world view of how it looks (per 1st pic).
Jp28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2019, 05:50 AM   #4
hdfb910
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Texas
Posts: 571
Looks fine to me...AP’s are not timid watches... Enjoy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Patek Philippe 5711/1A-010, Patek Philippe 5170G, Patek Philippe 5227R, Audemar Piguet 15400or, Audemar Piguet 15707ce, Audemar Piguet 26331IP, Audemar 15500 Blue dial, Rolex Pepsi 16710, Rolex Sub 116619LB (Smurf) F.P Journe Platinum Chronometre Souverain, Old School Breitling SuperOcean A17360, Jaeger LeCoultre Geophysic Tru Seconds

Instagram: @donpedro_007
hdfb910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2019, 06:45 AM   #5
golfski
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: US
Watch: me whip & nay nay
Posts: 397
almost all watches in my mind look huge in close up wrist shots. You really have to wear it in person to really get a good understanding. I got the Diver because I was worried about the 44mm sizes, while I love my Diver and glad I got it, I've tried on a 44mm ROO and think its awesome!

Here is a ROC and ROO Diver comparison on my wrist - they are almost the same size IMO (width and height).
Attached Images
   
golfski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 12:48 AM   #6
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
As I said on your other thread I think it looks fine, esp in that mirror shot, an AP ROO that doesn't fill your wrist or looks small on you is just wrong.

Pics can be deceiving, in the wider shot the lugs fall outside my wrist edges whereas in reality they do not.











AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 12:58 AM   #7
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
AK: That is a gorgeous clock, my favorite color combo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
As I said on your other thread I think it looks fine, esp in that mirror shot, an AP ROO that doesn't fill your wrist or looks small on you is just wrong.

Pics can be deceiving, in the wider shot the lugs fall outside my wrist edges whereas in reality they do not.





locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 01:28 AM   #8
porschejeff
"TRF" Member
 
porschejeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,460
Looks good to me enjoy it. I love mine.
__________________
Rolex DD 228238
Daytona 116515 (sold)
AP 15710
Rolex 116710 BLNR
And a few others...
porschejeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 03:07 AM   #9
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
Great looking piece ! Looks just fine to me still
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 08:14 AM   #10
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
AK: That is a gorgeous clock, my favorite color combo.
Cheers, John.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 08:35 AM   #11
TheDude
"TRF" Member
 
TheDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
AP Diver: Size perception

Looks great. They’re supposed to look big. Dive watches have always looked big - 60 years ago, 40mm Subs were clownishly large compared to dress watches of the day.

I wear a diver and my wrist isn’t big.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TheDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:55 AM   #12
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
As I said on your other thread I think it looks fine, esp in that mirror shot, an AP ROO that doesn't fill your wrist or looks small on you is just wrong.

Pics can be deceiving, in the wider shot the lugs fall outside my wrist edges whereas in reality they do not.












Neil,buddy, then stop taking pics so close. Every time I see your pics on it, I’m like “my English friend doesn’t realize it doesn’t fit” but I’m too nice to post it. Wait? I blame it on the bourbon
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 11:04 AM   #13
drgoro
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 816
That’s a shot!


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDude View Post
Looks great. They’re supposed to look big. Dive watches have always looked big - 60 years ago, 40mm Subs were clownishly large compared to dress watches of the day.

I wear a diver and my wrist isn’t big.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
drgoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 05:23 PM   #14
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
As I said on your other thread I think it looks fine, esp in that mirror shot, an AP ROO that doesn't fill your wrist or looks small on you is just wrong.

Pics can be deceiving, in the wider shot the lugs fall outside my wrist edges whereas in reality they do not.













That is a beauty!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 06:27 PM   #15
jay_kay
"TRF" Member
 
jay_kay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699


It is all about perspective and angle.

__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
jay_kay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 06:31 PM   #16
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
It wears like a sea dweller with the major difference being the magnificent AP rubber strap makes the watch fit to perfection. Enjoy it
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 07:14 PM   #17
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
The Diver is an offshore. Offshore watches are supposed to look big. From your photos, it looks fine. No worries.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 08:47 PM   #18
peterpl
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
Up close pictures ALWAYS make any watch look big.
peterpl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:32 PM   #19
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post
Neil,buddy, then stop taking pics so close. Every time I see your pics on it, I’m like “my English friend doesn’t realize it doesn’t fit” but I’m too nice to post it. Wait? I blame it on the bourbon
I know it looks it but these aren't particularly close, they are normal wrist shots, the wide one was very tricky to take and I had to extend alot to take it. I did it when I first got the watch and won't be doing it again, nor will I use mirror shots, just way too much hassle. This watch is all about capturing the fine details, so close is fine. We should all know how the camera makes things seem bigger and adds ten pounds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
That is a beauty!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cheers, lots of renewed interest in Lange now and I've been looking again at their offerings, ZW, Dato, but still prefer this to those and won't be trading it.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:36 PM   #20
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
I know it looks it but these aren't particularly close, they are normal wrist shots, the wide one was very tricky to take and I had to extend alot to take it. I did it when I first got the watch and won't be doing it again, nor will I use mirror shots, just way too much hassle. This watch is all about capturing the fine details, so close is fine, We should all know how the camera makes things seem bigger and adds ten pounds.



Cheers, lots of renewed interest in Lange now and I've been looking again at their offerings, ZW, Dato, but still prefer this to THEM and won't be trading it.
I’ve considered the new slimmer 42 ROO but I just can’t get over the size on me. I love seeing it on the guys here. I’m waiting on an AP that I’m hoping is perfect for me. Been out of the AP game for far too long
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:39 PM   #21
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post
I’ve considered the new slimmer 42 ROO but I just can’t get over the size on me. I love seeing it on the guys here. I’m waiting on an AP that I’m hoping is perfect for me. Been out of the AP game for far too long


Same wrist size...do it!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:47 PM   #22
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
Same wrist size...do it!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


39/40 is my preferred these days for my 6.5. That said I recently added two 42s. Guess it ebs and flows when you are nuts like us on here

Name:  IMG_6331.JPG
Views: 363
Size:  81.5 KBName:  IMG_7750.JPG
Views: 364
Size:  86.9 KB


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:49 PM   #23
Bearxj86
"TRF" Member
 
Bearxj86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
I know it looks it but these aren't particularly close, they are normal wrist shots, the wide one was very tricky to take and I had to extend alot to take it. I did it when I first got the watch and won't be doing it again, nor will I use mirror shots, just way too much hassle. This watch is all about capturing the fine details, so close is fine. We should all know how the camera makes things seem bigger and adds ten pounds.



Cheers, lots of renewed interest in Lange now and I've been looking again at their offerings, ZW, Dato, but still prefer this to those and won't be trading it.


I agree with this. I am quite particular about size when I dress for work or for formal. Almost all my watches are 36 to 40mm with the exception of my 44mm offshore. This is on a 6.75 flat wrist.

First off, top down pictures makes it even larger, so a wrist shot of the arm helps more. Second, embracing an offshore is accepting that it is oversized and owning the look.

Here are a few pics of the offshore and a more representative picture on arm versus top down wrist shot. You will see it looks like it overwhelms my wrist but in the arm pic it looks more appropriate by my eyes.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bearxj86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:53 PM   #24
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post
39/40 is my preferred these days for my 6.5. That said I recently added two 42s. Guess it ebs and flows when you are nuts like us on here.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yep. I’m the same. My collection ranges between 37mm and 40mm apart from the Diver.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2019, 10:56 PM   #25
NateInBama
"TRF" Member
 
NateInBama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Moody
Posts: 80
I LOVE larger watches. That’s a great one!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
NateInBama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2019, 12:03 AM   #26
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearxj86 View Post
I agree with this. I am quite particular about size when I dress for work or for formal. Almost all my watches are 36 to 40mm with the exception of my 44mm offshore. This is on a 6.75 flat wrist.

First off, top down pictures makes it even larger, so a wrist shot of the arm helps more. Second, embracing an offshore is accepting that it is oversized and owning the look.

Here are a few pics of the offshore and a more representative picture on arm versus top down wrist shot. You will see it looks like it overwhelms my wrist but in the arm pic it looks more appropriate by my eyes.


It is indeed much more relevant how a watch looks in the overall perspective of body and arm size than wrist itself.

__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2019, 02:42 AM   #27
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ap1 View Post
I’ve considered the new slimmer 42 ROO but I just can’t get over the size on me. I love seeing it on the guys here. I’m waiting on an AP that I’m hoping is perfect for me. Been out of the AP game for far too long
If in reality it does have the lugs going way past your wrist edges then you should pass, but if it is close then I'd still go for it on a ROO, I haven't not had a ROO for nearly ten years now and think this will stay the way, as I am not so much a RO guy.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2019, 02:48 AM   #28
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearxj86 View Post
I agree with this. I am quite particular about size when I dress for work or for formal. Almost all my watches are 36 to 40mm with the exception of my 44mm offshore. This is on a 6.75 flat wrist.

First off, top down pictures makes it even larger, so a wrist shot of the arm helps more. Second, embracing an offshore is accepting that it is oversized and owning the look.

Here are a few pics of the offshore and a more representative picture on arm versus top down wrist shot. You will see it looks like it overwhelms my wrist but in the arm pic it looks more appropriate by my eyes.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, look absolutely fine on you there in the mirror shots. As has been said before the 44 is less top heavy than the 42, which is a major factor for me in how a piece wears, and so as it spreads smoothly over my wrist it really doesn't feel as big as my Breitling Seawolf which feels much thicker or my old DSSD.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2019, 02:57 AM   #29
SMD
"TRF" Member
 
SMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Yes, look absolutely fine on you there in the mirror shots. As has been said before the 44 is less top heavy than the 42, which is a major factor for me in how a piece wears, and so as it spreads smoothly over my wrist it really doesn't feel as big as my Breitling Seawolf which feels much thicker or my old DSSD.
Agree with this. My 44 is far more comfortable than my 42s.
SMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2019, 05:14 AM   #30
jdkrut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Florida
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 156
I think it looks awesome on you!
jdkrut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.